Seiko Baselworld

Discussion of Seiko watches
User avatar
kfalk
Old Chub
Posts: 11533
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 7:50 am
Name: Kelly

Re: Seiko Baselworld

Post by kfalk » Mon Mar 10, 2014 7:58 am

JP Chestnut wrote:
ericf4 wrote:Orange monster which was the hype at one point. Nothing special...lame pins connecting links, decent bracelet, finishing nothing special, lume great...

Sent from my Nokia Lumia Icon
That's like having sex with the worlds ugliest woman and then telling everyone you're gay. You might be, or it might have just been a bad first impression.
I had to laugh at this, JP - nice one.



I happen to be a Seiko fan, but to each his own. :htfu:
Image

User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 17879
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ithaca, NY USA

Re: Seiko Baselworld

Post by JP Chestnut » Mon Mar 10, 2014 8:04 am

kfalk wrote:
JP Chestnut wrote:
ericf4 wrote:Orange monster which was the hype at one point. Nothing special...lame pins connecting links, decent bracelet, finishing nothing special, lume great...

Sent from my Nokia Lumia Icon
That's like having sex with the worlds ugliest woman and then telling everyone you're gay. You might be, or it might have just been a bad first impression.
I had to laugh at this, JP - nice one.



I happen to be a Seiko fan, but to each his own. :htfu:
I like Seiko too, just not the Monster watches. I wish I could wear a Sumo.

User avatar
CesarG
Mexican
Posts: 11521
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 2:18 pm
Name: Cesar
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Seiko Baselworld

Post by CesarG » Mon Mar 10, 2014 8:05 am

Torrid wrote:Meh, I still want this.


Or this.

Image
That is sexy.

User avatar
Torrid
Posts: 6693
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:43 am
Name: Heath
Location: Wisconsin

Re: Seiko Baselworld

Post by Torrid » Mon Mar 10, 2014 8:08 am

CesarG wrote:
Torrid wrote:Meh, I still want this.


Or this.

Image
That is sexy.
And 40mm too.

User avatar
dnslater
Posts: 6843
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:52 pm
Name: Nick
Location: Indiana, USA

Re: Seiko Baselworld

Post by dnslater » Mon Mar 10, 2014 8:18 am

ericf4 wrote:i always thought spring drive was an auto....hmm interesting, didn't know that.....

This has been debated ad nausea, however most of the movement is a high end automatic movement, powered by a 72 hour mainspring. They replaced the escapement with a regulator that uses the energy from the spring to run a quartz oscillator to govern the glide wheel, giving extreme accuracy and a completely smooth second hand. No battery, etc..... This differs from Kinetic, which is simply a quartz movement with a generator and weight.

User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 17879
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ithaca, NY USA

Re: Seiko Baselworld

Post by JP Chestnut » Mon Mar 10, 2014 8:20 am

dnslater wrote:
ericf4 wrote:i always thought spring drive was an auto....hmm interesting, didn't know that.....

This has been debated ad nausea, however most of the movement is a high end automatic movement, powered by a 72 hour mainspring. They replaced the escapement with a regulator that uses the energy from the spring to run a quartz oscillator to govern the glide wheel, giving extreme accuracy and a completely smooth second hand. No battery, etc..... This differs from Kinetic, which is simply a quartz movement with a generator and weight.
The amazing thing (and not in a good way) that I've heard about SD, is that you're not supposed to stick them on a winder. I had a back and forth with someone on TZ-UK who was absolutely sure Seiko says not to use a winder. Does anyone over here know if that's correct?

User avatar
Torrid
Posts: 6693
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:43 am
Name: Heath
Location: Wisconsin

Re: Seiko Baselworld

Post by Torrid » Mon Mar 10, 2014 8:31 am

I don't think it matters. They say not to use them with Kinetic because it takes more force than a slow turn to move the weight attached to the generator. It's why you can hear and feel the rotor moving when wearing a Kinetic.

User avatar
Torrid
Posts: 6693
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:43 am
Name: Heath
Location: Wisconsin

Re: Seiko Baselworld

Post by Torrid » Mon Mar 10, 2014 8:46 am

logan2z wrote:
Torrid wrote:I would love a Grand Seiko. Wearing this SARB that has a lot of similar styling cues to their dressier line makes it worse.
That SARB is hot. If not for the fact that it's 37mm that might have scratched my Aqua Terra itch.
Did you have one or did the size keep you from picking one up? According to the JDM Seiko catalog it is 38.4mm and 10mm thick which is a good fit on my. 6.75" wrist, though it would be perfect at 40mm. I wish the entry GS line wasn't all 37mm.

Image

User avatar
koda240
Hot Legs!
Posts: 6738
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 8:58 pm
Name: David
Location: Seal Beach, CA

Re: Seiko Baselworld

Post by koda240 » Mon Mar 10, 2014 8:54 am

Like Eric, I've had a hard time wrapping my head around the brand. But i find it's coming full circle when i look at the MM300 and Landmaster. Love those and will own at some point. Tuna- still dont get it. :).

User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 17879
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ithaca, NY USA

Re: Seiko Baselworld

Post by JP Chestnut » Mon Mar 10, 2014 8:57 am

koda240 wrote: Tuna- still dont get it. :).
I'm not sure what it is with the Tuna. Five years ago I would have never ever considered one. Now, I find it very attractive in a utilitarian sort of way.

User avatar
matt.wu
Wu
Posts: 30032
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:33 pm
Name: m@
Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA

Re: Seiko Baselworld

Post by matt.wu » Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:02 am

JP Chestnut wrote:
koda240 wrote: Tuna- still dont get it. :).
I'm not sure what it is with the Tuna. Five years ago I would have never ever considered one. Now, I find it very attractive in a utilitarian sort of way.
We call that "maturation".

:mrgreen:

Image
:htfu:

User avatar
hoppyjr
HJ
Posts: 40984
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 9:05 am
Name: Hoppy

Re: Seiko Baselworld

Post by hoppyjr » Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:25 am

JP Chestnut wrote:
koda240 wrote: Tuna- still dont get it. :).
I'm not sure what it is with the Tuna. Five years ago I would have never ever considered one. Now, I find it very attractive in a utilitarian sort of way.
I love the look of the Tuna and would wear it on Isofrane, but I'm worried it will wear small on my 8" wrist.....

User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 17879
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ithaca, NY USA

Re: Seiko Baselworld

Post by JP Chestnut » Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:29 am

hoppyjr wrote:
JP Chestnut wrote:
koda240 wrote: Tuna- still dont get it. :).
I'm not sure what it is with the Tuna. Five years ago I would have never ever considered one. Now, I find it very attractive in a utilitarian sort of way.
I love the look of the Tuna and would wear it on Isofrane, but I'm worried it will wear small on my 8" wrist.....
I have the opposite problem. I'm afraid it will wear... like a tuna can on my 6.5" wrist. I know that the short lugs mean it will fit (as in not overhang), but a roughly 48mm round watch sounds big.

User avatar
marchone
Capt. Obvious
Posts: 14806
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:30 am
Name: Wayne
Location: NYC

Re: Seiko Baselworld

Post by marchone » Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:35 am

It seems to me the 48mm Tuna was designed to be worn over a wet suit sleeve. For daily wear it would be like seeing a PloProf on a metrosexual at an ad agency.
only accurate watches are interesting

User avatar
Torrid
Posts: 6693
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:43 am
Name: Heath
Location: Wisconsin

Re: Seiko Baselworld

Post by Torrid » Mon Mar 10, 2014 11:50 am

The Tuna is no bigger lug to lug than a 6309. My Sumo wears much bigger.

User avatar
koda240
Hot Legs!
Posts: 6738
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 8:58 pm
Name: David
Location: Seal Beach, CA

Re: Seiko Baselworld

Post by koda240 » Mon Mar 10, 2014 11:58 am

JP Chestnut wrote:
koda240 wrote: Tuna- still dont get it. :).
I'm not sure what it is with the Tuna. Five years ago I would have never ever considered one. Now, I find it very attractive in a utilitarian sort of way.
To your point, I've completely changed my view of a few seiko models and watch... Within 3 months I'll probably own a tuna

User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 17879
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ithaca, NY USA

Re: Seiko Baselworld

Post by JP Chestnut » Mon Mar 10, 2014 11:59 am

Torrid wrote:The Tuna is no bigger lug to lug than a 6309. My Sumo wears much bigger.
My internet research suggests the L2L on the Tuna is around 44mm which is rather small indeed. The older "too small" Rolex 40mm models were 47mm L2L by comparison.

User avatar
BBK357
Ban Jacobs
Posts: 29241
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 2:01 pm
Name: Vladimir
Location: Ohio

Re: Seiko Baselworld

Post by BBK357 » Mon Mar 10, 2014 12:13 pm

Yep- tuna is a big watch that wears like a small one. That's why I have mine while 40mm is my sweet spot.
DEATH FROM ABOVE
:ak:

User avatar
Henryj
Bubblehead
Posts: 4652
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:17 pm
Name: Old guy
Location: Wapakoneta, Ohio

Re: Seiko Baselworld

Post by Henryj » Mon Mar 10, 2014 1:32 pm

These two do it for me. The one on the left is a lead candidate for my "grown up" watch.

Image
If you put a large switch in some cave somewhere, with a sign on it saying 'End-of-the-World Switch. PLEASE DO NOT TOUCH', the paint wouldn't even have time to dry.

User avatar
logan2z
IT Admin
Posts: 11884
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:08 am
Name: Andrew
Location: SF Bay Area, CA

Re: Seiko Baselworld

Post by logan2z » Mon Mar 10, 2014 1:38 pm

Torrid wrote:
logan2z wrote:
Torrid wrote:I would love a Grand Seiko. Wearing this SARB that has a lot of similar styling cues to their dressier line makes it worse.
That SARB is hot. If not for the fact that it's 37mm that might have scratched my Aqua Terra itch.
Did you have one or did the size keep you from picking one up? According to the JDM Seiko catalog it is 38.4mm and 10mm thick which is a good fit on my. 6.75" wrist, though it would be perfect at 40mm. I wish the entry GS line wasn't all 37mm.

Image
I've never had one or seen one in the metal. Just basing it off experience with other watches smaller than 40mm and the way they look on my flat 7" wrist. I realize diameter isn't the only important metric, however.

User avatar
Torrid
Posts: 6693
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:43 am
Name: Heath
Location: Wisconsin

Re: Seiko Baselworld

Post by Torrid » Mon Mar 10, 2014 1:46 pm

Henryj wrote:These two do it for me. The one on the left is a lead candidate for my "grown up" watch.

Image
Damn, I want both of those too.

User avatar
jeckyll
Honorary Assistant Jr. Hall Monitor in Training
Posts: 12035
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:11 pm
Name: Björn

Re: Seiko Baselworld

Post by jeckyll » Mon Mar 10, 2014 1:55 pm

Too many wadded croc's in this tread. Also, Matt, when you're ready to sell that Tuna, PM me :)

The worst thing is, as I'm trying to own less watches overall, I realized I own 5 Seikos. Seems excessive. Anyone besides Eric or Pat want to buy an Orange Monster? $125 shipped for DWC.

:grin:
We all have the same enemy. The enemy is the tyranny of the dull mind. - - Tom Robbins

User avatar
Torrid
Posts: 6693
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:43 am
Name: Heath
Location: Wisconsin

Re: Seiko Baselworld

Post by Torrid » Mon Mar 10, 2014 2:23 pm

To be honest as a Seiko freak, I've had three Monsters and I still don't understand them.

User avatar
jeckyll
Honorary Assistant Jr. Hall Monitor in Training
Posts: 12035
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:11 pm
Name: Björn

Re: Seiko Baselworld

Post by jeckyll » Mon Mar 10, 2014 4:03 pm

Torrid wrote:To be honest as a Seiko freak, I've had three Monsters and I still don't understand them.
In my view, nothing to understand. They are a cheap, fun mechanical watch with distinctive (some say polarizing) styling. :)
We all have the same enemy. The enemy is the tyranny of the dull mind. - - Tom Robbins

User avatar
lilhoody
Black Darin
Posts: 9018
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:46 pm
Name: BD
Location: Phoenix

Re: Seiko Baselworld

Post by lilhoody » Mon Mar 10, 2014 4:13 pm

JP Chestnut wrote:
hoppyjr wrote:
JP Chestnut wrote:
koda240 wrote: Tuna- still dont get it. :).
I'm not sure what it is with the Tuna. Five years ago I would have never ever considered one. Now, I find it very attractive in a utilitarian sort of way.
I love the look of the Tuna and would wear it on Isofrane, but I'm worried it will wear small on my 8" wrist.....
I have the opposite problem. I'm afraid it will wear... like a tuna can on my 6.5" wrist. I know that the short lugs mean it will fit (as in not overhang), but a roughly 48mm round watch sounds big.
Ed, you need an Emperor or Darth.

Jacob, you need a regular Tuna.
"Men are ruled by toys"
Napoleon Bonaparte

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests