Maybe I should rephrase - they can’t / won’t produce to meet demand.JP Chestnut wrote:I haven’t seen anything about rolex cutting production outside of covid disruptions.BacoNoir wrote: ↑Tue Feb 16, 2021 3:29 pmIt's a mess of Rolex's own making. They limited supply, drove up demand, which changed the grey market from discounters to profiteers. With all the demands they make of their ADs to spend 100's of thousands of $$ to remodel and then give them limited supply of watches to sell to the public, the grey market makes more sense.
Whistleblower lawsuit involving major Chicago AD
Re: Whistleblower lawsuit involving major Chicago AD
Re: Whistleblower lawsuit involving major Chicago AD
and yet they can overproduce the stuff they can't easily sell and force those on ADs instead.
yeah, i'm not buying that they can't meet demand. they either won't or aren't smart enough to produce the right volume of different models. you decide which sounds more logical.
yeah, i'm not buying that they can't meet demand. they either won't or aren't smart enough to produce the right volume of different models. you decide which sounds more logical.
- streetracer101
- Posts: 8793
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 6:41 pm
- Name: Mr Shackleford
Re: Whistleblower lawsuit involving major Chicago AD
They own their own smelt. I am pretty sure they can supply demand, but doing so would mean they'd have to start discounting watches again, which seems to be against of the business model of most lux watch manufacturers.gwells wrote: ↑Tue Feb 16, 2021 5:49 pmand yet they can overproduce the stuff they can't easily sell and force those on ADs instead.
yeah, i'm not buying that they can't meet demand. they either won't or aren't smart enough to produce the right volume of different models. you decide which sounds more logical.
Re: Whistleblower lawsuit involving major Chicago AD
scarcity is part of the business model. even if it's forced.
- JP Chestnut
- Posts: 17879
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
- Name: Jacob
- Location: Ithaca, NY USA
Re: Whistleblower lawsuit involving major Chicago AD
They were supposedly expanding production but covid derailed it. With that said, it still won't meet capacity.
Re: Whistleblower lawsuit involving major Chicago AD
The more I think about it, the more I think Rolex will have to investigate this further and put additional protections in place to prevent this type of thing from reoccurring. Their entire marketing and stock distribution plan is currently based upon false data.
Without knowing the actual situation, Rolex would logically conclude the market for their products in Chicago was blazing hot when in actuality it could be only much less active.
The scheme is actually a self-perpetuating as Rolex would like direct stock to these “hot” locations and diminish distribution to ethical AD’s who turn inventory less frequently.
Without knowing the actual situation, Rolex would logically conclude the market for their products in Chicago was blazing hot when in actuality it could be only much less active.
The scheme is actually a self-perpetuating as Rolex would like direct stock to these “hot” locations and diminish distribution to ethical AD’s who turn inventory less frequently.
Re: Whistleblower lawsuit involving major Chicago AD
that presumes this is a surprise to rolex. i mean... if that's true, wouldn't they already have done this? it's not like they didn't already know this was happening. shit, we knew it was happening, so you know they knew.
Re: Whistleblower lawsuit involving major Chicago AD
I'm just guessing here, but I'm thinking there may have been some semi-intentional "ignorance is bliss" going on at Rolex corporate, especially during this pandemic where in store purchases were globally weak. Sales are maxed out, so why worry?
That said, just think about all the internal systems at Rolex this "underground distribution network" is effecting. Traditionally, companies use sales results to influence marketing spend, distribution allocations, etc. - all by region. Assuming Rolex uses these metrics, they are all completely incorrect as the watch reported to have been sold in an AD in Chicago, was actually delivered to a customer in Miami through a grey market reseller. The market metrics are all incorrect.
The grey market essentially moves Rolex from an AD distribution process to a web store distribution process which has a completely different customer experience (not in alignment with the Rolex corporate image).
My guess (based upon the corporate imposed requirements on AD's) is Rolex does not desire their customers to make their purchases via a web experience. This ultimately damages their brand image which is why they will act.
That said, just think about all the internal systems at Rolex this "underground distribution network" is effecting. Traditionally, companies use sales results to influence marketing spend, distribution allocations, etc. - all by region. Assuming Rolex uses these metrics, they are all completely incorrect as the watch reported to have been sold in an AD in Chicago, was actually delivered to a customer in Miami through a grey market reseller. The market metrics are all incorrect.
The grey market essentially moves Rolex from an AD distribution process to a web store distribution process which has a completely different customer experience (not in alignment with the Rolex corporate image).
My guess (based upon the corporate imposed requirements on AD's) is Rolex does not desire their customers to make their purchases via a web experience. This ultimately damages their brand image which is why they will act.
Last edited by Ryeguy on Wed Feb 17, 2021 6:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Whistleblower lawsuit involving major Chicago AD
Always remember that Rolex is owned by a "non profit" foundation and has no shareholders to answer to. They are vertically integrated and I'm sure have a healthy markup on their products. There is no real motivation to fluctuate production to meet the demand from emerging markets for brief periods. They are playing the long game and have been under essentially the same ownership for a century. They could expand their production facilities to respond to a 5-10 year demand surge, but that my hurt them in the end if they have to lay off/downsize production when things slow down.
Last edited by dnslater on Wed Feb 17, 2021 6:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Whistleblower lawsuit involving major Chicago AD
I'm sure Rolex knows this is going on. On a macro/bottomline level, they may not care. The watches they're shipping to AD's are getting sold. The watches are so desirable that people are willing to pay heavily inflated prices by purchasing through the gray market. On a business morality level, they may care, because they don't want to alienate their customer base and because they may want to be viewed as a good corporate citizen (albeit a privately held one).
But they don't have much incentive to act unless their product stops moving. Sure, they should try to prevent this sort of thing since it's the right thing to do, but will they? Rolex is a unique brand - like it or not they're the Coca-Cola or McDonald's of luxury watches. They can get away with things that other brands can't because they're the best known luxury watch company in the world and their products remain incredibly desirable. If there were suddenly a shortage of Blancpains, IWC's, or JLC''s, most consumers would just go and buy something else. Not so with Rolex - people who want a Daytona or a Submariner most often will not accept a substitute.
Patek is in a similar situation, though they have a much smaller client base due to price.
But they don't have much incentive to act unless their product stops moving. Sure, they should try to prevent this sort of thing since it's the right thing to do, but will they? Rolex is a unique brand - like it or not they're the Coca-Cola or McDonald's of luxury watches. They can get away with things that other brands can't because they're the best known luxury watch company in the world and their products remain incredibly desirable. If there were suddenly a shortage of Blancpains, IWC's, or JLC''s, most consumers would just go and buy something else. Not so with Rolex - people who want a Daytona or a Submariner most often will not accept a substitute.
Patek is in a similar situation, though they have a much smaller client base due to price.

- JP Chestnut
- Posts: 17879
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
- Name: Jacob
- Location: Ithaca, NY USA
Re: Whistleblower lawsuit involving major Chicago AD
There's a difference between "knowing" and having actionable proof that consumers are aware of. While both can be ignored by a firm, most typically choose to act in the latter case.
Re: Whistleblower lawsuit involving major Chicago AD
This is like a bunch of women in a crafting club. 
It doesn’t matter if Rolex knew, what matters is what they do with this AD and how they address the larger issue with other AD’s who do the same.

It doesn’t matter if Rolex knew, what matters is what they do with this AD and how they address the larger issue with other AD’s who do the same.
Re: Whistleblower lawsuit involving major Chicago AD
Yeah, I know it is just idle, meaningless, chatter, but it is an interesting topic nonetheless.
I agree with Jacob, maybe suspicions can be ignored, but specific evidence is hard to sweep under the rug.
I also can't help but think about the massive expense Rolex spent to modify and cultivate this relatively new image of being "the world's best known luxury brand". Rolex invested wisely to transform themselves from being "a good quality, reliable, timepiece" to being a "statement" purchase. As someone once said, "Rolex offers the best $3,000 watch $10,000 can buy". You don't do that without creating and maintaining an "image" and "buying experience".
Sales leadership (broadly speaking) is focused on short term, immediate future vision. Rolex senior leadership, as stated above, is playing the long game. I suspect they will conclude an internet buying experience that is outside their highly controlled and cultivated AD network is ultimately damaging to their brand, even if it results in a somewhat decreased sales volume in the immediate future.
If nothing else, I'm curious to see how everything shakes out.
I agree with Jacob, maybe suspicions can be ignored, but specific evidence is hard to sweep under the rug.
I also can't help but think about the massive expense Rolex spent to modify and cultivate this relatively new image of being "the world's best known luxury brand". Rolex invested wisely to transform themselves from being "a good quality, reliable, timepiece" to being a "statement" purchase. As someone once said, "Rolex offers the best $3,000 watch $10,000 can buy". You don't do that without creating and maintaining an "image" and "buying experience".
Sales leadership (broadly speaking) is focused on short term, immediate future vision. Rolex senior leadership, as stated above, is playing the long game. I suspect they will conclude an internet buying experience that is outside their highly controlled and cultivated AD network is ultimately damaging to their brand, even if it results in a somewhat decreased sales volume in the immediate future.
If nothing else, I'm curious to see how everything shakes out.
Re: Whistleblower lawsuit involving major Chicago AD
i just agree with andrea. you're being incredibly generous with Rolex to call it "suspicions." it's hard to believe they haven't known exactly what's going on for a very long time. and while the system is broken for watch buyers, it doesn't seem to have hurt rolex's bottom line and thus they haven't done much about it.
honestly, i doubt this will change much (unless lawsuits like this start happening all over the place and they're forced to confront it). the only people who see this and care from the owners perspectives likely already know it's been going on for years. it's not new, it's just a chance for a few of us to say, "good, maybe someone's getting some comeuppance here for a change." but the average watch buyer probably won't even know there was a single lawsuit in one city with one dealer, won't realize it's part of a much larger thing that's been going on for the better part of a decade (maybe longer?), and probably won't get worked up about it. so business as usual for rolex, maybe with a new AD in chicagoland.
honestly, i doubt this will change much (unless lawsuits like this start happening all over the place and they're forced to confront it). the only people who see this and care from the owners perspectives likely already know it's been going on for years. it's not new, it's just a chance for a few of us to say, "good, maybe someone's getting some comeuppance here for a change." but the average watch buyer probably won't even know there was a single lawsuit in one city with one dealer, won't realize it's part of a much larger thing that's been going on for the better part of a decade (maybe longer?), and probably won't get worked up about it. so business as usual for rolex, maybe with a new AD in chicagoland.
- toxicavenger
- President Tranny
- Posts: 48293
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:25 am
- Name: HeadDIK
- Location: Colorado Springs
Re: Whistleblower lawsuit involving major Chicago AD
rolex is just a bunch of dickweeds
Website: http://smallwhitestubbies.com/ 

Re: Whistleblower lawsuit involving major Chicago AD
This is interesting. I bought some watches from CD Peacock, Rolex and Patek. They found out I flipped them and told me they would not sell to me anymore. I even bought my wife a watch which she still owns and I bought some jewelry there. This was at the Oakbrook store. Funny thing is whenever I talked to the salesman he would tell me how much the different models were selling for on the gray market. This was before they banned me.
- JP Chestnut
- Posts: 17879
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
- Name: Jacob
- Location: Ithaca, NY USA
Re: Whistleblower lawsuit involving major Chicago AD
I guess they were pissed that you enjoyed the extra margin off the flip.drster wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 12:49 pmThis is interesting. I bought some watches from CD Peacock, Rolex and Patek. They found out I flipped them and told me they would not sell to me anymore. I even bought my wife a watch which she still owns and I bought some jewelry there. This was at the Oakbrook store. Funny thing is whenever I talked to the salesman he would tell me how much the different models were selling for on the gray market. This was before they banned me.
Re: Whistleblower lawsuit involving major Chicago AD
You obviously weren’t kicking back the cash they expected.
- john wilson
- Posts: 1812
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:54 pm
- Name: supercalifragilistic
- Location: Cleveland,Ohio.
Re: Whistleblower lawsuit involving major Chicago AD

"Remove booger hook from bang button until ready to make holes." Albert Einstein







- JP Chestnut
- Posts: 17879
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
- Name: Jacob
- Location: Ithaca, NY USA
Re: Whistleblower lawsuit involving major Chicago AD
They’re all dorks and pussies over there.
- john wilson
- Posts: 1812
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:54 pm
- Name: supercalifragilistic
- Location: Cleveland,Ohio.
Re: Whistleblower lawsuit involving major Chicago AD

"Remove booger hook from bang button until ready to make holes." Albert Einstein







- JP Chestnut
- Posts: 17879
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
- Name: Jacob
- Location: Ithaca, NY USA
Re: Whistleblower lawsuit involving major Chicago AD
You should have just offered to blow DavidSW in exchange for the opportunity to buy a Rolex from him at 2X MSRP. You would have fit right in over there.john wilson wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 3:38 pm![]()
- john wilson
- Posts: 1812
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:54 pm
- Name: supercalifragilistic
- Location: Cleveland,Ohio.
Re: Whistleblower lawsuit involving major Chicago AD
That sounds creepy.JP Chestnut wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 4:17 pmYou should have just offered to blow DavidSW in exchange for the opportunity to buy a Rolex from him at 2X MSRP. You would have fit right in over there.john wilson wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 3:38 pm![]()

"Remove booger hook from bang button until ready to make holes." Albert Einstein







Re: Whistleblower lawsuit involving major Chicago AD
......but that turquoise dial OP....john wilson wrote:That sounds creepy.JP Chestnut wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 4:17 pmYou should have just offered to blow DavidSW in exchange for the opportunity to buy a Rolex from him at 2X MSRP. You would have fit right in over there.john wilson wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 3:38 pm![]()


Re: Whistleblower lawsuit involving major Chicago AD
So bizarre, but that's really how it is. How that dude managed to get his fanboi's to that level, while charging them 2X MSRP, I'll never understand. I got it when he was selling stuff for 15% off MSRP...now, fuuuuck off.JP Chestnut wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 4:17 pmYou should have just offered to blow DavidSW in exchange for the opportunity to buy a Rolex from him at 2X MSRP. You would have fit right in over there.john wilson wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 3:38 pm![]()

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests