Discussion of Seiko watches
-
kfalk
- Old Chub
- Posts: 11533
- Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 7:50 am
- Name: Kelly
Post
by kfalk » Mon Mar 10, 2014 7:58 am
JP Chestnut wrote:ericf4 wrote:Orange monster which was the hype at one point. Nothing special...lame pins connecting links, decent bracelet, finishing nothing special, lume great...
Sent from my Nokia Lumia Icon
That's like having sex with the worlds ugliest woman and then telling everyone you're gay. You might be, or it might have just been a bad first impression.
I had to laugh at this, JP - nice one.
I happen to be a Seiko fan, but to each his own.

-
JP Chestnut
- Posts: 17879
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
- Name: Jacob
- Location: Ithaca, NY USA
Post
by JP Chestnut » Mon Mar 10, 2014 8:04 am
kfalk wrote:JP Chestnut wrote:ericf4 wrote:Orange monster which was the hype at one point. Nothing special...lame pins connecting links, decent bracelet, finishing nothing special, lume great...
Sent from my Nokia Lumia Icon
That's like having sex with the worlds ugliest woman and then telling everyone you're gay. You might be, or it might have just been a bad first impression.
I had to laugh at this, JP - nice one.
I happen to be a Seiko fan, but to each his own.

I like Seiko too, just not the Monster watches. I wish I could wear a Sumo.
-
CesarG
- Mexican
- Posts: 11521
- Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 2:18 pm
- Name: Cesar
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Post
by CesarG » Mon Mar 10, 2014 8:05 am
Torrid wrote:Meh, I still want this.
Or this.

That is sexy.
-
Torrid
- Posts: 6693
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:43 am
- Name: Heath
- Location: Wisconsin
Post
by Torrid » Mon Mar 10, 2014 8:08 am
CesarG wrote:Torrid wrote:Meh, I still want this.
Or this.

That is sexy.
And 40mm too.
-
dnslater
- Posts: 6843
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:52 pm
- Name: Nick
- Location: Indiana, USA
Post
by dnslater » Mon Mar 10, 2014 8:18 am
ericf4 wrote:i always thought spring drive was an auto....hmm interesting, didn't know that.....
This has been debated ad nausea, however most of the movement is a high end automatic movement, powered by a 72 hour mainspring. They replaced the escapement with a regulator that uses the energy from the spring to run a quartz oscillator to govern the glide wheel, giving extreme accuracy and a completely smooth second hand. No battery, etc..... This differs from Kinetic, which is simply a quartz movement with a generator and weight.
-
JP Chestnut
- Posts: 17879
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
- Name: Jacob
- Location: Ithaca, NY USA
Post
by JP Chestnut » Mon Mar 10, 2014 8:20 am
dnslater wrote:ericf4 wrote:i always thought spring drive was an auto....hmm interesting, didn't know that.....
This has been debated ad nausea, however most of the movement is a high end automatic movement, powered by a 72 hour mainspring. They replaced the escapement with a regulator that uses the energy from the spring to run a quartz oscillator to govern the glide wheel, giving extreme accuracy and a completely smooth second hand. No battery, etc..... This differs from Kinetic, which is simply a quartz movement with a generator and weight.
The amazing thing (and not in a good way) that I've heard about SD, is that you're not supposed to stick them on a winder. I had a back and forth with someone on TZ-UK who was absolutely sure Seiko says not to use a winder. Does anyone over here know if that's correct?
-
Torrid
- Posts: 6693
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:43 am
- Name: Heath
- Location: Wisconsin
Post
by Torrid » Mon Mar 10, 2014 8:31 am
I don't think it matters. They say not to use them with Kinetic because it takes more force than a slow turn to move the weight attached to the generator. It's why you can hear and feel the rotor moving when wearing a Kinetic.
-
Torrid
- Posts: 6693
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:43 am
- Name: Heath
- Location: Wisconsin
Post
by Torrid » Mon Mar 10, 2014 8:46 am
logan2z wrote:Torrid wrote:I would love a Grand Seiko. Wearing this SARB that has a lot of similar styling cues to their dressier line makes it worse.
That SARB is hot. If not for the fact that it's 37mm that might have scratched my Aqua Terra itch.
Did you have one or did the size keep you from picking one up? According to the JDM Seiko catalog it is 38.4mm and 10mm thick which is a good fit on my. 6.75" wrist, though it would be perfect at 40mm. I wish the entry GS line wasn't all 37mm.

-
koda240
- Hot Legs!
- Posts: 6738
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 8:58 pm
- Name: David
- Location: Seal Beach, CA
Post
by koda240 » Mon Mar 10, 2014 8:54 am
Like Eric, I've had a hard time wrapping my head around the brand. But i find it's coming full circle when i look at the MM300 and Landmaster. Love those and will own at some point. Tuna- still dont get it.

.
-
JP Chestnut
- Posts: 17879
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
- Name: Jacob
- Location: Ithaca, NY USA
Post
by JP Chestnut » Mon Mar 10, 2014 8:57 am
koda240 wrote: Tuna- still dont get it.

.
I'm not sure what it is with the Tuna. Five years ago I would have never ever considered one. Now, I find it very attractive in a utilitarian sort of way.
-
matt.wu
- Wu
- Posts: 30032
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:33 pm
- Name: m@
- Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA
Post
by matt.wu » Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:02 am
JP Chestnut wrote:koda240 wrote: Tuna- still dont get it.

.
I'm not sure what it is with the Tuna. Five years ago I would have never ever considered one. Now, I find it very attractive in a utilitarian sort of way.
We call that "maturation".

-
hoppyjr
- HJ
- Posts: 40984
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 9:05 am
- Name: Hoppy
Post
by hoppyjr » Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:25 am
JP Chestnut wrote:koda240 wrote: Tuna- still dont get it.

.
I'm not sure what it is with the Tuna. Five years ago I would have never ever considered one. Now, I find it very attractive in a utilitarian sort of way.
I love the look of the Tuna and would wear it on Isofrane, but I'm worried it will wear small on my 8" wrist.....
-
JP Chestnut
- Posts: 17879
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
- Name: Jacob
- Location: Ithaca, NY USA
Post
by JP Chestnut » Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:29 am
hoppyjr wrote:JP Chestnut wrote:koda240 wrote: Tuna- still dont get it.

.
I'm not sure what it is with the Tuna. Five years ago I would have never ever considered one. Now, I find it very attractive in a utilitarian sort of way.
I love the look of the Tuna and would wear it on Isofrane, but I'm worried it will wear small on my 8" wrist.....
I have the opposite problem. I'm afraid it will wear... like a tuna can on my 6.5" wrist. I know that the short lugs mean it will fit (as in not overhang), but a roughly 48mm round watch sounds big.
-
marchone
- Capt. Obvious
- Posts: 14806
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:30 am
- Name: Wayne
- Location: NYC
Post
by marchone » Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:35 am
It seems to me the 48mm Tuna was designed to be worn over a wet suit sleeve. For daily wear it would be like seeing a PloProf on a metrosexual at an ad agency.
only accurate watches are interesting
-
Torrid
- Posts: 6693
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:43 am
- Name: Heath
- Location: Wisconsin
Post
by Torrid » Mon Mar 10, 2014 11:50 am
The Tuna is no bigger lug to lug than a 6309. My Sumo wears much bigger.
-
koda240
- Hot Legs!
- Posts: 6738
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 8:58 pm
- Name: David
- Location: Seal Beach, CA
Post
by koda240 » Mon Mar 10, 2014 11:58 am
JP Chestnut wrote:koda240 wrote: Tuna- still dont get it.

.
I'm not sure what it is with the Tuna. Five years ago I would have never ever considered one. Now, I find it very attractive in a utilitarian sort of way.
To your point, I've completely changed my view of a few seiko models and watch... Within 3 months I'll probably own a tuna
-
JP Chestnut
- Posts: 17879
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
- Name: Jacob
- Location: Ithaca, NY USA
Post
by JP Chestnut » Mon Mar 10, 2014 11:59 am
Torrid wrote:The Tuna is no bigger lug to lug than a 6309. My Sumo wears much bigger.
My internet research suggests the L2L on the Tuna is around 44mm which is rather small indeed. The older "too small" Rolex 40mm models were 47mm L2L by comparison.
-
BBK357
- Ban Jacobs
- Posts: 29239
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 2:01 pm
- Name: Vladimir
- Location: Ohio
Post
by BBK357 » Mon Mar 10, 2014 12:13 pm
Yep- tuna is a big watch that wears like a small one. That's why I have mine while 40mm is my sweet spot.
DEATH FROM ABOVE

-
Henryj
- Bubblehead
- Posts: 4652
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:17 pm
- Name: Old guy
- Location: Wapakoneta, Ohio
Post
by Henryj » Mon Mar 10, 2014 1:32 pm
These two do it for me. The one on the left is a lead candidate for my "grown up" watch.

If you put a large switch in some cave somewhere, with a sign on it saying 'End-of-the-World Switch. PLEASE DO NOT TOUCH', the paint wouldn't even have time to dry.
-
logan2z
- IT Admin
- Posts: 11884
- Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:08 am
- Name: Andrew
- Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Post
by logan2z » Mon Mar 10, 2014 1:38 pm
Torrid wrote:logan2z wrote:Torrid wrote:I would love a Grand Seiko. Wearing this SARB that has a lot of similar styling cues to their dressier line makes it worse.
That SARB is hot. If not for the fact that it's 37mm that might have scratched my Aqua Terra itch.
Did you have one or did the size keep you from picking one up? According to the JDM Seiko catalog it is 38.4mm and 10mm thick which is a good fit on my. 6.75" wrist, though it would be perfect at 40mm. I wish the entry GS line wasn't all 37mm.

I've never had one or seen one in the metal. Just basing it off experience with other watches smaller than 40mm and the way they look on my flat 7" wrist. I realize diameter isn't the only important metric, however.
-
Torrid
- Posts: 6693
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:43 am
- Name: Heath
- Location: Wisconsin
Post
by Torrid » Mon Mar 10, 2014 1:46 pm
Henryj wrote:These two do it for me. The one on the left is a lead candidate for my "grown up" watch.

Damn, I want both of those too.
-
jeckyll
- Honorary Assistant Jr. Hall Monitor in Training
- Posts: 12035
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:11 pm
- Name: Björn
Post
by jeckyll » Mon Mar 10, 2014 1:55 pm
Too many wadded croc's in this tread. Also, Matt, when you're ready to sell that Tuna, PM me
The worst thing is, as I'm trying to own less watches overall, I realized I own 5 Seikos. Seems excessive. Anyone besides Eric or Pat want to buy an Orange Monster? $125 shipped for DWC.

We all have the same enemy. The enemy is the tyranny of the dull mind. - - Tom Robbins
-
Torrid
- Posts: 6693
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:43 am
- Name: Heath
- Location: Wisconsin
Post
by Torrid » Mon Mar 10, 2014 2:23 pm
To be honest as a Seiko freak, I've had three Monsters and I still don't understand them.
-
jeckyll
- Honorary Assistant Jr. Hall Monitor in Training
- Posts: 12035
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:11 pm
- Name: Björn
Post
by jeckyll » Mon Mar 10, 2014 4:03 pm
Torrid wrote:To be honest as a Seiko freak, I've had three Monsters and I still don't understand them.
In my view, nothing to understand. They are a cheap, fun mechanical watch with distinctive (some say polarizing) styling.

We all have the same enemy. The enemy is the tyranny of the dull mind. - - Tom Robbins
-
lilhoody
- Black Darin
- Posts: 9018
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:46 pm
- Name: BD
- Location: Phoenix
Post
by lilhoody » Mon Mar 10, 2014 4:13 pm
JP Chestnut wrote:hoppyjr wrote:JP Chestnut wrote:koda240 wrote: Tuna- still dont get it.

.
I'm not sure what it is with the Tuna. Five years ago I would have never ever considered one. Now, I find it very attractive in a utilitarian sort of way.
I love the look of the Tuna and would wear it on Isofrane, but I'm worried it will wear small on my 8" wrist.....
I have the opposite problem. I'm afraid it will wear... like a tuna can on my 6.5" wrist. I know that the short lugs mean it will fit (as in not overhang), but a roughly 48mm round watch sounds big.
Ed, you need an Emperor or Darth.
Jacob, you need a regular Tuna.
"Men are ruled by toys"
Napoleon Bonaparte