PAM 682
-
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2017 11:09 pm
- Name: Salty
PAM 682
Curious what everyones opinion would be on this particular model? 42mm is not optimal for most. But looking at someone with a smaller size wrist. Thoughts?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Re: PAM 682
I'm looking for one.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2017 11:09 pm
- Name: Salty
Re: PAM 682
Sent you PM with location of one
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Re: PAM 682
Rob has one. It looks amazing from what I’ve seen.
Re: PAM 682
I wanted it to be perfect, but it looked like a ladies watch on me.
- streetracer101
- Posts: 8793
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 6:41 pm
- Name: Mr Shackleford
Re: PAM 682
I love these, but the price needs to settle down a bit for it to be a serious contender.
- rockmastermike
- Feedback Virtuoso
- Posts: 21627
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 5:13 pm
- Name: WDE
Re: PAM 682
exactly rightstreetracer101 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 9:34 amI love these, but the price needs to settle down a bit for it to be a serious contender.
Re: PAM 682
This ^^^^^^streetracer101 wrote:I love these, but the price needs to settle down a bit for it to be a serious contender.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
- Axelay2003
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2010 9:03 am
- Name: Gerard
- Location: City of Oranges, FL
Re: PAM 682
I wonder if they will release a black ceramic bezel one like it’s bigger sibling. I like this size, but as mentioned above, it’s competing in the luxury end at $9k.
It's a beautiful world! Gerald.


- Axelay2003
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2010 9:03 am
- Name: Gerard
- Location: City of Oranges, FL
Re: PAM 682
Thanks for posting the comparison photos. That will work on my wrist. One of my fave PAM.
It's a beautiful world! Gerald.


Re: PAM 682
Thank you! I didn’t realize it was only 106g, I thought it was much heavier.
It’s amazing how large the 114060 looks.
It’s amazing how large the 114060 looks.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 195 guests