Discussion of Omega watches.
-
CesarG
- Mexican
- Posts: 11521
- Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 2:18 pm
- Name: Cesar
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Post
by CesarG » Mon Mar 21, 2011 3:50 pm
Other than that horrible dial, the watch looks legit... but should have a 565 caliber
-
moishlashen
- Posts: 16208
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 5:28 am
- Name: Leu Sanis
- Location: Somewheres paddlin' it.
Post
by moishlashen » Mon Mar 21, 2011 3:55 pm
Handset. Don't think they had skeletons until recently-unless the lume completely fell out

"I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quiet of servitude."
-
Oracle
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:55 pm
- Name: Kevin
- Location: Valley of the Bears
-
Contact:
Post
by Oracle » Mon Mar 21, 2011 4:10 pm
1st thing I noticed: the 300
under the Seamaster. It should be after it.
-Movement should be 565
-Hands look ok, just looks like the lume came out. Mine was actually the same, so I bought some NOS ones from O Frei's.
-Wrong crown (may be correct for 563)

-
moishlashen
- Posts: 16208
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 5:28 am
- Name: Leu Sanis
- Location: Somewheres paddlin' it.
Post
by moishlashen » Mon Mar 21, 2011 4:15 pm
Yep-seamaster on top is dead giveaway. Good call.
Never realized that before-also dial looks almost like it has applied indices. Wierd that handset lume fell out and there is nothing to support the lume in the first place.
"I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quiet of servitude."
-
CesarG
- Mexican
- Posts: 11521
- Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 2:18 pm
- Name: Cesar
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Post
by CesarG » Mon Mar 21, 2011 4:18 pm
The crown looks to be the correct replacement to the original Naiad crown your SM300 has, Kevin
-
Oracle
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:55 pm
- Name: Kevin
- Location: Valley of the Bears
-
Contact:
Post
by Oracle » Mon Mar 21, 2011 4:31 pm
hks3sgte wrote:The crown looks to be the correct replacement to the original Naiad crown your SM300 has, Kevin
Oh, that's right, they stick out further than the orig. My bad.
Chris: Here's mine when I got it, sans lume. Those were the original hands though AFAIK.

-
moishlashen
- Posts: 16208
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 5:28 am
- Name: Leu Sanis
- Location: Somewheres paddlin' it.
Post
by moishlashen » Mon Mar 21, 2011 4:49 pm
Interesting. Wonder if thats how they came up with the skeleton handsets of today

"I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quiet of servitude."
-
River Rat
- DWC Tribal Council
- Posts: 12925
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 6:00 am
- Location: Montana
Post
by River Rat » Mon Mar 21, 2011 5:32 pm
The dial looks totally wrong.Wrong writing wrong time marks and there should be a chrome out line around the date window.I passed on one once that turned out legit it was also missing the lume.Could of got it for 800.00 I felt like shit after I found out it was real some one I know bought it.
Here is a good web site Omega 300 hall of shame.
http://scubawatch.org/hallofshame.html
This site should have a permanent spot as a sticky.
-
sfglenrock
- Posts: 2389
- Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 8:11 pm
- Name: Steve
- Location: Cape Cod
Post
by sfglenrock » Mon Mar 21, 2011 6:32 pm
River Rat wrote:The dial looks totally wrong.Wrong writing wrong time marks and there should be a chrome out line around the date window.I passed on one once that turned out legit it was also missing the lume.Could of got it for 800.00 I felt like shit after I found out it was real some one I know bought it.
Here is a good web site Omega 300 hall of shame.
http://scubawatch.org/hallofshame.html
This site should have a permanent spot as a sticky.
Agree with Mike that the dial looks completely wrong. I'm not an expert but I've never seen a small triangle version.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 69 guests