It just dawned on me that there is no GMT PO

[vbuskirk]

Something to add to my "future watch" list maybe...

[matt.wu]

No, but there is THIS one

[FlyPenFly]

Is that using their super unreliable PO Chrono movement? I heard the newest production chronos are Okay but the earlier ones are time bombs.

[BSears]

LOVE that AT GMT. It's as close to the PO in GMT as we might get, unless Omega does something about that.

I had no idea the PO Chrono movement had problems. What kind of stuff are we talking about here?

[mrsnak]

That's why for GMT, I got myself a 2234.50.

[SCM64]

LOVE that AT GMT. It's as close to the PO in GMT as we might get, unless Omega does something about that.

I had no idea the PO Chrono movement had problems. What kind of stuff are we talking about here?

I don't remember myself, but I know I was seriously looking at PO chronos last year and had read about some of the problems. I'm sure someone here will know the specifics.

[mrsnak]

LOVE that AT GMT. It's as close to the PO in GMT as we might get, unless Omega does something about that.

I had no idea the PO Chrono movement had problems. What kind of stuff are we talking about here?

I don't remember myself, but I know I was seriously looking at PO chronos last year and had read about some of the problems. I'm sure someone here will know the specifics.

It was problems with the early movements. Omega fixed that. These were usually taken care of under warranty, but many may have slipped through the cracks (because they exhibited no problem at the time). Killer watch at a great price.

[jimyritz]

No, but there is THIS one

---------------------

Love that one.....

Mike

[Pasquale]

No, but there is THIS one