Also was able to try one... it sucks.JP Chestnut wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2019 5:02 pmThe 39.5mm wears like a big mac on the wrist. The thickness to diameter ratio is totally off. Combine that with a smallish dial and 19mm lugs![]()
I really wanted to flip my 42mm PO2500d for one, and then I tried it on![]()
So... the new PO
- Joeprez
- Wants to see pics of your wife
- Posts: 13997
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 5:36 am
- Name: Joe
- Location: Puerto Rico
Re: So... the new PO

Omega / Tudor / Rolex / Sinn / Doxa / Seiko
- Joeprez
- Wants to see pics of your wife
- Posts: 13997
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 5:36 am
- Name: Joe
- Location: Puerto Rico
Re: So... the new PO
Part is the picture, but its bigger than the 2500 PO. Its an interesting watch, the dial is really nice, light. I would own one and wear it on the weekends.JP Chestnut wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2019 3:37 pmIt looks gigantic on you, but it could be the picture. It’s also thicker than the smaller date version for no reason.
But what really got me thinking is a blue Seamaster... I want to hold up till next year to see if Tudor releases a BB58 with blue dial and blue bezel. If not, blue Seamaster for me.

Omega / Tudor / Rolex / Sinn / Doxa / Seiko
Re: So... the new PO
The 39.5mm was terrible. Not sure why it's getting such good reception? The 43.5mm is where it's at for me. They nailed that one.Joeprez wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2019 6:46 pmAlso was able to try one... it sucks.JP Chestnut wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2019 5:02 pmThe 39.5mm wears like a big mac on the wrist. The thickness to diameter ratio is totally off. Combine that with a smallish dial and 19mm lugs![]()
I really wanted to flip my 42mm PO2500d for one, and then I tried it on![]()
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests