New Benrus Type I

Come on in and introduce yourself!
General watch talk.
User avatar
logan2z
IT Admin
Posts: 11744
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:08 am
Name: Andrew
Location: SF Bay Area, CA

Re: New Benrus Type I

Post by logan2z » Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:00 pm

^^ Saw that, great response from the manufacturer.

User avatar
Chocodove
Posts: 8976
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:35 pm
Name: Todd
Location: NJ

Re: New Benrus Type I

Post by Chocodove » Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:17 pm

It’s an excellent response and now makes me more likely to get one.
- Todd

User avatar
toxicavenger
President Tranny
Posts: 48115
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:25 am
Name: HeadDIK
Location: Colorado Springs

Re: New Benrus Type I

Post by toxicavenger » Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:20 pm

Weird, at this cost point they didn't eliminate the ghost date setting. I remember not too long ago micro brands being roasted over this, and there were watches under $1,000.

User avatar
logan2z
IT Admin
Posts: 11744
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:08 am
Name: Andrew
Location: SF Bay Area, CA

Re: New Benrus Type I

Post by logan2z » Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:25 pm

toxicavenger wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:20 pm
Weird, at this cost point they didn't eliminate the ghost date setting. I remember not too long ago micro brands being roasted over this, and there were watches under $1,000.
Definitely would have been better if they'd removed it. I'm pretty sure that Stowa removes it on their no-date watches. But I've owned a watch with a ghost date and it didn't bug me too much.

User avatar
BBK357
Ban Jacobs
Posts: 28867
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 2:01 pm
Name: Vladimir
Location: Ohio

Re: New Benrus Type I

Post by BBK357 » Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:27 pm

toxicavenger wrote:Weird, at this cost point they didn't eliminate the ghost date setting. I remember not too long ago micro brands being roasted over this, and there were watches under $1,000.
My Paradive has it and it’s so dumb. It does cheapen the watch for sure.

That being said I do want to try the new Benrus
DEATH FROM ABOVE
:ak:

User avatar
toxicavenger
President Tranny
Posts: 48115
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:25 am
Name: HeadDIK
Location: Colorado Springs

Re: New Benrus Type I

Post by toxicavenger » Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:28 pm

logan2z wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:25 pm
toxicavenger wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:20 pm
Weird, at this cost point they didn't eliminate the ghost date setting. I remember not too long ago micro brands being roasted over this, and there were watches under $1,000.
Definitely would have been better if they'd removed it. I'm pretty sure that Stowa removes it on their no-date watches. But I've owned a watch with a ghost date and it didn't bug me too much.
Honestly it doesn't bug me at all. But at one time people here were saying they wouldn't buy a watch with that attribute. For this price point it's something that should not be there. For example If Monta did this on their release they would have been grilled even more than they were.

User avatar
Selym
Posts: 3061
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 8:16 pm
Name: Myles
Location: Massive Two Shits

Re: New Benrus Type I

Post by Selym » Tue Nov 24, 2020 1:08 pm

toxicavenger wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:28 pm
logan2z wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:25 pm
toxicavenger wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:20 pm
Weird, at this cost point they didn't eliminate the ghost date setting. I remember not too long ago micro brands being roasted over this, and there were watches under $1,000.
Definitely would have been better if they'd removed it. I'm pretty sure that Stowa removes it on their no-date watches. But I've owned a watch with a ghost date and it didn't bug me too much.
Honestly it doesn't bug me at all. But at one time people here were saying they wouldn't buy a watch with that attribute. For this price point it's something that should not be there. For example If Monta did this on their release they would have been grilled even more than they were.
I see it as a feature. If you decide you want to switch to a dial with a date aperture, you're good to go. :thumbsup:

User avatar
toxicavenger
President Tranny
Posts: 48115
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:25 am
Name: HeadDIK
Location: Colorado Springs

Re: New Benrus Type I

Post by toxicavenger » Tue Nov 24, 2020 7:21 pm

Selym wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 1:08 pm
toxicavenger wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:28 pm
logan2z wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:25 pm
toxicavenger wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:20 pm
Weird, at this cost point they didn't eliminate the ghost date setting. I remember not too long ago micro brands being roasted over this, and there were watches under $1,000.
Definitely would have been better if they'd removed it. I'm pretty sure that Stowa removes it on their no-date watches. But I've owned a watch with a ghost date and it didn't bug me too much.
Honestly it doesn't bug me at all. But at one time people here were saying they wouldn't buy a watch with that attribute. For this price point it's something that should not be there. For example If Monta did this on their release they would have been grilled even more than they were.
I see it as a feature. If you decide you want to switch to a dial with a date aperture, you're good to go. :thumbsup:
hahahaha :monkeypiss:

User avatar
streetracer101
Posts: 8787
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 6:41 pm
Name: Mr Shackleford

Re: New Benrus Type I

Post by streetracer101 » Tue Nov 24, 2020 8:08 pm

toxicavenger wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:28 pm
logan2z wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:25 pm
toxicavenger wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:20 pm
Weird, at this cost point they didn't eliminate the ghost date setting. I remember not too long ago micro brands being roasted over this, and there were watches under $1,000.
Definitely would have been better if they'd removed it. I'm pretty sure that Stowa removes it on their no-date watches. But I've owned a watch with a ghost date and it didn't bug me too much.
Honestly it doesn't bug me at all. But at one time people here were saying they wouldn't buy a watch with that attribute. For this price point it's something that should not be there. For example If Monta did this on their release they would have been grilled even more than they were.
Agreed, but watch nerds are a fickle group. I thought the response on MWR was excellent. It goes to show that so much more goes into the design of these than what often meets the eye. I want one, but not at retail. My guess is that these will find permanent homes and never leave (unless one lands at Hop's place).

User avatar
streetracer101
Posts: 8787
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 6:41 pm
Name: Mr Shackleford

Re: New Benrus Type I

Post by streetracer101 » Tue Nov 24, 2020 8:13 pm

Side note. These haven't sold out, so this made me laugh:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Benrus-Type-1- ... SwRVJfrKWm
I appreciate the NIB comment with a hairy wrist shot pic.

User avatar
hoppyjr
HJ
Posts: 39781
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 9:05 am
Name: Hoppy

Re: New Benrus Type I

Post by hoppyjr » Tue Nov 24, 2020 8:23 pm

streetracer101 wrote:
toxicavenger wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:28 pm
logan2z wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:25 pm
toxicavenger wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:20 pm
Weird, at this cost point they didn't eliminate the ghost date setting. I remember not too long ago micro brands being roasted over this, and there were watches under $1,000.
Definitely would have been better if they'd removed it. I'm pretty sure that Stowa removes it on their no-date watches. But I've owned a watch with a ghost date and it didn't bug me too much.
Honestly it doesn't bug me at all. But at one time people here were saying they wouldn't buy a watch with that attribute. For this price point it's something that should not be there. For example If Monta did this on their release they would have been grilled even more than they were.
Agreed, but watch nerds are a fickle group. I thought the response on MWR was excellent. It goes to show that so much more goes into the design of these than what often meets the eye. I want one, but not at retail. My guess is that these will find permanent homes and never leave (unless one lands at Hop's place).
Mine isn’t going anywhere.

Image

User avatar
jtbenson
Posts: 6186
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 2:21 pm
Name: jason
Location: middle west

Re: New Benrus Type I

Post by jtbenson » Tue Nov 24, 2020 8:29 pm

I will just add that I reached out to Darius with a few concerns after receiving my shipment from ‘dinkee today.
He replied directly via email addressing all my questions/concerns directly.
Extremely content with his responses.
I invited him to come here and join this discussion.
Image

User avatar
CGSshorty
Admin
Posts: 33929
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 5:18 pm
Location: Boynton Beach, FL

Re: New Benrus Type I

Post by CGSshorty » Tue Nov 24, 2020 10:00 pm

logan2z wrote:
toxicavenger wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:20 pm
Weird, at this cost point they didn't eliminate the ghost date setting. I remember not too long ago micro brands being roasted over this, and there were watches under $1,000.
Definitely would have been better if they'd removed it. I'm pretty sure that Stowa removes it on their no-date watches. But I've owned a watch with a ghost date and it didn't bug me too much.
People bitched about it on the U1-Pro. Removing it would have added about $100 to the price. Sinn didn’t have no-date movements in stock, obviously. When the price is getting higher than you’d like, sacrifices must be made. That was a choice I’ll defend any day.
"It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever."
David St. Hubbins

User avatar
sierra11b
Posts: 6309
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 9:37 am
Name: Eric
Location: Kalunicornia

Re: New Benrus Type I

Post by sierra11b » Wed Nov 25, 2020 6:48 am

hoppyjr wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 8:23 pm
streetracer101 wrote:
toxicavenger wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:28 pm
logan2z wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:25 pm
toxicavenger wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:20 pm
Weird, at this cost point they didn't eliminate the ghost date setting. I remember not too long ago micro brands being roasted over this, and there were watches under $1,000.
Definitely would have been better if they'd removed it. I'm pretty sure that Stowa removes it on their no-date watches. But I've owned a watch with a ghost date and it didn't bug me too much.
Honestly it doesn't bug me at all. But at one time people here were saying they wouldn't buy a watch with that attribute. For this price point it's something that should not be there. For example If Monta did this on their release they would have been grilled even more than they were.
Agreed, but watch nerds are a fickle group. I thought the response on MWR was excellent. It goes to show that so much more goes into the design of these than what often meets the eye. I want one, but not at retail. My guess is that these will find permanent homes and never leave (unless one lands at Hop's place).
Mine isn’t going anywhere.

Image
Sure! :roll:

User avatar
spring-diver
Posts: 2279
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 10:29 am
Name: Shannon

Re: New Benrus Type I

Post by spring-diver » Wed Nov 25, 2020 8:46 am

hoppyjr wrote:
streetracer101 wrote:
toxicavenger wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:28 pm
logan2z wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:25 pm
toxicavenger wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:20 pm
Weird, at this cost point they didn't eliminate the ghost date setting. I remember not too long ago micro brands being roasted over this, and there were watches under $1,000.
Definitely would have been better if they'd removed it. I'm pretty sure that Stowa removes it on their no-date watches. But I've owned a watch with a ghost date and it didn't bug me too much.
Honestly it doesn't bug me at all. But at one time people here were saying they wouldn't buy a watch with that attribute. For this price point it's something that should not be there. For example If Monta did this on their release they would have been grilled even more than they were.
Agreed, but watch nerds are a fickle group. I thought the response on MWR was excellent. It goes to show that so much more goes into the design of these than what often meets the eye. I want one, but not at retail. My guess is that these will find permanent homes and never leave (unless one lands at Hop's place).
Mine isn’t going anywhere.

Image
Congrats buddy ImageImageImage


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Seiko: SBDB001, SBDX001, SRP777

Sinn: EZM9, T1, T1B, 836 & 857S

:cheers:

User avatar
toxicavenger
President Tranny
Posts: 48115
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:25 am
Name: HeadDIK
Location: Colorado Springs

Re: New Benrus Type I

Post by toxicavenger » Wed Nov 25, 2020 9:31 am

streetracer101 wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 8:13 pm
Side note. These haven't sold out, so this made me laugh:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Benrus-Type-1- ... SwRVJfrKWm
I appreciate the NIB comment with a hairy wrist shot pic.
they stole hodinkee's pics also. pretty shitty

User avatar
BBK357
Ban Jacobs
Posts: 28867
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 2:01 pm
Name: Vladimir
Location: Ohio

Re: New Benrus Type I

Post by BBK357 » Wed Nov 25, 2020 10:01 am

hoppyjr wrote:
streetracer101 wrote:
toxicavenger wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:28 pm
logan2z wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:25 pm
toxicavenger wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:20 pm
Weird, at this cost point they didn't eliminate the ghost date setting. I remember not too long ago micro brands being roasted over this, and there were watches under $1,000.
Definitely would have been better if they'd removed it. I'm pretty sure that Stowa removes it on their no-date watches. But I've owned a watch with a ghost date and it didn't bug me too much.
Honestly it doesn't bug me at all. But at one time people here were saying they wouldn't buy a watch with that attribute. For this price point it's something that should not be there. For example If Monta did this on their release they would have been grilled even more than they were.
Agreed, but watch nerds are a fickle group. I thought the response on MWR was excellent. It goes to show that so much more goes into the design of these than what often meets the eye. I want one, but not at retail. My guess is that these will find permanent homes and never leave (unless one lands at Hop's place).
Mine isn’t going anywhere.

Image
And if history is correct——— it may live in Ohio.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
DEATH FROM ABOVE
:ak:

User avatar
BBK357
Ban Jacobs
Posts: 28867
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 2:01 pm
Name: Vladimir
Location: Ohio

Re: New Benrus Type I

Post by BBK357 » Wed Nov 25, 2020 10:01 am

CGSshorty wrote:
logan2z wrote:
toxicavenger wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:20 pm
Weird, at this cost point they didn't eliminate the ghost date setting. I remember not too long ago micro brands being roasted over this, and there were watches under $1,000.
Definitely would have been better if they'd removed it. I'm pretty sure that Stowa removes it on their no-date watches. But I've owned a watch with a ghost date and it didn't bug me too much.
People bitched about it on the U1-Pro. Removing it would have added about $100 to the price. Sinn didn’t have no-date movements in stock, obviously. When the price is getting higher than you’d like, sacrifices must be made. That was a choice I’ll defend any day.
That makes sense.
I’d rather pay $100 less and have the ghost date then.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
DEATH FROM ABOVE
:ak:

User avatar
logan2z
IT Admin
Posts: 11744
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:08 am
Name: Andrew
Location: SF Bay Area, CA

Re: New Benrus Type I

Post by logan2z » Wed Nov 25, 2020 10:31 am

CGSshorty wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 10:00 pm
logan2z wrote:
toxicavenger wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:20 pm
Weird, at this cost point they didn't eliminate the ghost date setting. I remember not too long ago micro brands being roasted over this, and there were watches under $1,000.
Definitely would have been better if they'd removed it. I'm pretty sure that Stowa removes it on their no-date watches. But I've owned a watch with a ghost date and it didn't bug me too much.
People bitched about it on the U1-Pro. Removing it would have added about $100 to the price. Sinn didn’t have no-date movements in stock, obviously. When the price is getting higher than you’d like, sacrifices must be made. That was a choice I’ll defend any day.
Just to clarify the term 'ghost date', are we talking about removing the date mechanism from the movement but retaining the date setting position of the crown, or is the date mechanism left in place as well? I don't think I'd mind the 'ghost' position on the crown, but I don't think I'd like to hear the date clicking over in my no-date watch.

Possibly showing my ignorance about movement design here, maybe it's all or nothing.

R@cerx
Posts: 3481
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:51 am
Name: David

Re: New Benrus Type I

Post by R@cerx » Wed Nov 25, 2020 10:44 am

BBK357 wrote:
Wed Nov 25, 2020 10:01 am
CGSshorty wrote:
logan2z wrote:
toxicavenger wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:20 pm
Weird, at this cost point they didn't eliminate the ghost date setting. I remember not too long ago micro brands being roasted over this, and there were watches under $1,000.
Definitely would have been better if they'd removed it. I'm pretty sure that Stowa removes it on their no-date watches. But I've owned a watch with a ghost date and it didn't bug me too much.
People bitched about it on the U1-Pro. Removing it would have added about $100 to the price. Sinn didn’t have no-date movements in stock, obviously. When the price is getting higher than you’d like, sacrifices must be made. That was a choice I’ll defend any day.
That makes sense.
I’d rather pay $100 less and have the ghost date then.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They could have made up the cost of making this change to the movement by selling these themselves.

User avatar
TSD
Posts: 2784
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 6:47 am
Name: Tom
Location: So Fla

Re: New Benrus Type I

Post by TSD » Wed Nov 25, 2020 10:46 am

logan2z wrote:
Wed Nov 25, 2020 10:31 am
Just to clarify the term 'ghost date', are we talking about removing the date mechanism from the movement but retaining the date setting position of the crown, or is the date mechanism left in place as well? I don't think I'd mind the 'ghost' position on the crown, but I don't think I'd like to hear the date clicking over in my no-date watch.
The U1 Pro is my only experience with this, but its just a 'ghost' position on the crown. There's no noise and nothing going on when the crown's in that position.

User avatar
BBK357
Ban Jacobs
Posts: 28867
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 2:01 pm
Name: Vladimir
Location: Ohio

Re: New Benrus Type I

Post by BBK357 » Wed Nov 25, 2020 12:09 pm

TSD wrote:
logan2z wrote:
Wed Nov 25, 2020 10:31 am
Just to clarify the term 'ghost date', are we talking about removing the date mechanism from the movement but retaining the date setting position of the crown, or is the date mechanism left in place as well? I don't think I'd mind the 'ghost' position on the crown, but I don't think I'd like to hear the date clicking over in my no-date watch.
The U1 Pro is my only experience with this, but its just a 'ghost' position on the crown. There's no noise and nothing going on when the crown's in that position.

Oh yes- that’s not bad at all. And I don’t remember my u1p having the click with the date.

Now my paradong totally has the date function still working inside. That I what I don’t like- healing a click at midnight and it’s a no date


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
DEATH FROM ABOVE
:ak:

User avatar
dukerules
Posts: 15055
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: New Benrus Type I

Post by dukerules » Wed Nov 25, 2020 1:59 pm

TSD wrote:
logan2z wrote:
Wed Nov 25, 2020 10:31 am
Just to clarify the term 'ghost date', are we talking about removing the date mechanism from the movement but retaining the date setting position of the crown, or is the date mechanism left in place as well? I don't think I'd mind the 'ghost' position on the crown, but I don't think I'd like to hear the date clicking over in my no-date watch.
The U1 Pro is my only experience with this, but its just a 'ghost' position on the crown. There's no noise and nothing going on when the crown's in that position.
Yep. Theoretically this should bother me, but it doesn’t in the slightest.

User avatar
streetracer101
Posts: 8787
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 6:41 pm
Name: Mr Shackleford

Re: New Benrus Type I

Post by streetracer101 » Wed Nov 25, 2020 6:11 pm

R@cerx wrote:
Wed Nov 25, 2020 10:44 am
BBK357 wrote:
Wed Nov 25, 2020 10:01 am
CGSshorty wrote:
logan2z wrote:
toxicavenger wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:20 pm
Weird, at this cost point they didn't eliminate the ghost date setting. I remember not too long ago micro brands being roasted over this, and there were watches under $1,000.
Definitely would have been better if they'd removed it. I'm pretty sure that Stowa removes it on their no-date watches. But I've owned a watch with a ghost date and it didn't bug me too much.
People bitched about it on the U1-Pro. Removing it would have added about $100 to the price. Sinn didn’t have no-date movements in stock, obviously. When the price is getting higher than you’d like, sacrifices must be made. That was a choice I’ll defend any day.
That makes sense.
I’d rather pay $100 less and have the ghost date then.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They could have made up the cost of making this change to the movement by selling these themselves.
If they haven't sold out a small production # with the help of Hoodwinked, they probably wouldn't move many pieces at all without them.

User avatar
streetracer101
Posts: 8787
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 6:41 pm
Name: Mr Shackleford

Re: New Benrus Type I

Post by streetracer101 » Wed Nov 25, 2020 6:12 pm

hoppyjr wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 8:23 pm
streetracer101 wrote:
toxicavenger wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:28 pm
logan2z wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:25 pm
toxicavenger wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:20 pm
Weird, at this cost point they didn't eliminate the ghost date setting. I remember not too long ago micro brands being roasted over this, and there were watches under $1,000.
Definitely would have been better if they'd removed it. I'm pretty sure that Stowa removes it on their no-date watches. But I've owned a watch with a ghost date and it didn't bug me too much.
Honestly it doesn't bug me at all. But at one time people here were saying they wouldn't buy a watch with that attribute. For this price point it's something that should not be there. For example If Monta did this on their release they would have been grilled even more than they were.
Agreed, but watch nerds are a fickle group. I thought the response on MWR was excellent. It goes to show that so much more goes into the design of these than what often meets the eye. I want one, but not at retail. My guess is that these will find permanent homes and never leave (unless one lands at Hop's place).
Mine isn’t going anywhere.

Image
Shoot me a txt when you change your mind.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], blkgsl, DocHollidayDDS, Mr_Pacman and 531 guests