Come on in and introduce yourself!
General watch talk.
-
vbuskirk
- Thread Jacker Extraordinaire
- Posts: 7279
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:36 pm
- Name: Chris
- Location: Nashvegas
Post
by vbuskirk » Wed Jun 09, 2010 9:11 pm
Come on guys. Admit it.
This watch is the shiznitz.

Chris
-
toxicavenger
- President Tranny
- Posts: 48293
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:25 am
- Name: HeadDIK
- Location: Colorado Springs
Post
by toxicavenger » Thu Jun 10, 2010 10:06 am
I do like the look of Debaufre and Steinhart but Debaufre sucks!

-
matt.wu
- Wu
- Posts: 30034
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:33 pm
- Name: m@
- Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA
Post
by matt.wu » Thu Jun 10, 2010 10:13 am
toxicavenger wrote:I do like the look of Debaufre and Steinhart....
Well they do take their design cues from a very reliable source.

-
toxicavenger
- President Tranny
- Posts: 48293
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:25 am
- Name: HeadDIK
- Location: Colorado Springs
Post
by toxicavenger » Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:23 pm
Who would have guessed that?
My reply was to the fact that Debaufre CS sucks now so that makes it a lesser watch IMO.

-
DMB
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 7865
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 3:34 pm
- Name: Magnificent Bastard
- Location: On the high ground with interlocking fields of fire
Post
by DMB » Sat Jun 12, 2010 5:15 pm
I bought the pepsi GMT from Debaufre. I think it was the shortest I ever kept a watch. Great watch, but I just couldn't get over wearing something that was so close to the original. It made me feel dirty. Now if it had a different bracelet, sans cyclops or maybe a different bezel edge or crown position ... I probably would have kept it. But nothing on that watch is an original idea. Yet ..... it WAS a nice watch.
