(Hodinkee) They Built a $100 Million Watch Empire. Then the Market Tanked

Come on in and introduce yourself!
General watch talk.
Baffo
Posts: 453
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2023 8:50 pm

Re: (Hodinkee) They Built a $100 Million Watch Empire. Then the Market Tanked

Post by Baffo » Fri Jun 07, 2024 2:32 pm

that would be great, a good IWC would be a welcome addition to my collection.

User avatar
dukerules
Posts: 15087
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: (Hodinkee) They Built a $100 Million Watch Empire. Then the Market Tanked

Post by dukerules » Sat Jun 08, 2024 4:34 am

Agree, modern Tudor is killing it right now, and makes it very hard for many, me included, to justify paying Rolex prices. That said, there's almost always something about all of these otherwise very nice Tudors that is a little off. Thickness, faux rivets, and grade 2 Ti on the Pelagos line all come to mind. That said, I absolutely adore my little BB58. It's a ton of watch for the money, and after wearing my 16600 all week it seems like it's easily just as good and probably better in many ways.

User avatar
demer03
Current Forecast: Vintage Doxa
Posts: 20060
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:41 pm
Name: Moke the Doxa ho
Location: Lake Michigami

Re: (Hodinkee) They Built a $100 Million Watch Empire. Then the Market Tanked

Post by demer03 » Sat Jun 08, 2024 5:18 am

dukerules wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2024 4:34 am
Agree, modern Tudor is killing it right now, and makes it very hard for many, me included, to justify paying Rolex prices. That said, there's almost always something about all of these otherwise very nice Tudors that is a little off. Thickness, faux rivets, and grade 2 Ti on the Pelagos line all come to mind. That said, I absolutely adore my little BB58. It's a ton of watch for the money, and after wearing my 16600 all week it seems like it's easily just as good and probably better in many ways.
The Thickness kill it for me. Straight on…gorgeous.
Old Michigan steams like a young man's dreams
The islands and bays are for sportsmen

Image

R@cerx
Posts: 3541
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:51 am
Name: David
Location: SC

Re: (Hodinkee) They Built a $100 Million Watch Empire. Then the Market Tanked

Post by R@cerx » Sat Jun 08, 2024 7:48 am

demer03 wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2024 5:18 am
dukerules wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2024 4:34 am
Agree, modern Tudor is killing it right now, and makes it very hard for many, me included, to justify paying Rolex prices. That said, there's almost always something about all of these otherwise very nice Tudors that is a little off. Thickness, faux rivets, and grade 2 Ti on the Pelagos line all come to mind. That said, I absolutely adore my little BB58. It's a ton of watch for the money, and after wearing my 16600 all week it seems like it's easily just as good and probably better in many ways.
The Thickness kill it for me. Straight on…gorgeous.
Agreed. The one I had was slab-sided, and to be honest it didn’t match the hype.

User avatar
dnslater
Posts: 6843
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:52 pm
Name: Nick
Location: Indiana, USA

Re: (Hodinkee) They Built a $100 Million Watch Empire. Then the Market Tanked

Post by dnslater » Sat Jun 08, 2024 9:54 am

demer03 wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2024 5:18 am
dukerules wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2024 4:34 am
Agree, modern Tudor is killing it right now, and makes it very hard for many, me included, to justify paying Rolex prices. That said, there's almost always something about all of these otherwise very nice Tudors that is a little off. Thickness, faux rivets, and grade 2 Ti on the Pelagos line all come to mind. That said, I absolutely adore my little BB58. It's a ton of watch for the money, and after wearing my 16600 all week it seems like it's easily just as good and probably better in many ways.
The Thickness kill it for me. Straight on…gorgeous.
The Pelagos lineup is where it’s at for Tudor. They step out of the Rolex shadow unlike BB’s and are all interesting and easy to wear. All of the three hand FXD’s are thinner than a modern sub.

User avatar
DocHollidayDDS
Posts: 1037
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2023 9:03 pm
Name: James
Location: SC

Re: (Hodinkee) They Built a $100 Million Watch Empire. Then the Market Tanked

Post by DocHollidayDDS » Sat Jun 08, 2024 12:22 pm

demer03 wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2024 5:18 am
dukerules wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2024 4:34 am
Agree, modern Tudor is killing it right now, and makes it very hard for many, me included, to justify paying Rolex prices. That said, there's almost always something about all of these otherwise very nice Tudors that is a little off. Thickness, faux rivets, and grade 2 Ti on the Pelagos line all come to mind. That said, I absolutely adore my little BB58. It's a ton of watch for the money, and after wearing my 16600 all week it seems like it's easily just as good and probably better in many ways.
The Thickness kill it for me. Straight on…gorgeous.
Add me to this list. Not at all a fan of the slab sides. I’d definitely own their white-dial GMT if it didn’t look like such a chunky monkey.

User avatar
Chocodove
Posts: 9313
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:35 pm
Name: Todd
Location: NJ

Re: (Hodinkee) They Built a $100 Million Watch Empire. Then the Market Tanked

Post by Chocodove » Sat Jun 08, 2024 12:57 pm

The new BB41 case eliminates a lot of the previous complaints about it IMO. I’m a believer after trying one on.
- Todd

User avatar
dukerules
Posts: 15087
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:32 pm

(Hodinkee) They Built a $100 Million Watch Empire. Then the Market Tanked

Post by dukerules » Sat Jun 08, 2024 1:28 pm

The Tudor/Kenissi movements are pretty awesome too. Robust, silicon hairspring, free spring balance, very good PR. They seem to be pretty incredible time keepers too. While not truly in house in the strictest sense of the term, hard to find anything else that matches them in terms of technical chops at the Pierce.

R@cerx
Posts: 3541
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:51 am
Name: David
Location: SC

Re: (Hodinkee) They Built a $100 Million Watch Empire. Then the Market Tanked

Post by R@cerx » Sun Jun 09, 2024 5:17 am

dukerules wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2024 4:34 am
Agree, modern Tudor is killing it right now, and makes it very hard for many, me included, to justify paying Rolex prices. That said, there's almost always something about all of these otherwise very nice Tudors that is a little off. Thickness, faux rivets, and grade 2 Ti on the Pelagos line all come to mind. That said, I absolutely adore my little BB58. It's a ton of watch for the money, and after wearing my 16600 all week it seems like it's easily just as good and probably better in many ways.
TBH, based upon my experience I find it hard to put a BB58 and a Sea-Dweller in the same class.

User avatar
dukerules
Posts: 15087
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: (Hodinkee) They Built a $100 Million Watch Empire. Then the Market Tanked

Post by dukerules » Sun Jun 09, 2024 9:35 am

On paper, of course not. In the metal, it’s a different story. And the 16600 is my favorite watch of all time.
Image

R@cerx
Posts: 3541
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:51 am
Name: David
Location: SC

Re: (Hodinkee) They Built a $100 Million Watch Empire. Then the Market Tanked

Post by R@cerx » Sun Jun 09, 2024 10:54 am

dukerules wrote:
Sun Jun 09, 2024 9:35 am
On paper, of course not. In the metal, it’s a different story. And the 16600 is my favorite watch of all time.
Image
My opinion is based upon in the metal as well. The BB underwhelmed. IMO, the bracelet is not the best, guess that’s why there are several aftermarket ones for the BB. My 16600 is a favorite.

User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 17874
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ithaca, NY USA

Re: (Hodinkee) They Built a $100 Million Watch Empire. Then the Market Tanked

Post by JP Chestnut » Mon Jun 10, 2024 1:51 pm

R@cerx wrote:
Sun Jun 09, 2024 10:54 am
dukerules wrote:
Sun Jun 09, 2024 9:35 am
On paper, of course not. In the metal, it’s a different story. And the 16600 is my favorite watch of all time.
My opinion is based upon in the metal as well. The BB underwhelmed. IMO, the bracelet is not the best, guess that’s why there are several aftermarket ones for the BB. My 16600 is a favorite.
Someone posted that there's almost always something off about a Tudor reference, and this picture does a good job showing. I'm sure that the BB is a very nice watch, but that fake rivet bracelet just isn't working for me, and I really wish it did. A small BB diver with the Tudor glidelock seems, on paper, like a great choice. But I just know that I'd buy one, wear it a bit until the "new" wore off, and then pick a Rolex over it every single time I go to my watch box.

On edit: to be fair, I feel the EXACT same way about my two Omegas :shrug:

User avatar
BacoNoir
Posts: 7410
Joined: Tue May 10, 2016 6:33 pm
Name: Roger
Location: Colorado

Re: (Hodinkee) They Built a $100 Million Watch Empire. Then the Market Tanked

Post by BacoNoir » Fri Oct 04, 2024 10:56 am

Hodinkee just sold to Watches of Switzerland and Clymer is coming back to run Hodinkee. They can hold Hodinkee events at WOS stores - should be a good thing for both of them.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/anthonydem ... -hodinkee/
www.simplynoble.net
Time Magazine Person of the Year - 2006

Image

User avatar
HiDive
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 5:15 pm
Name: Vincent
Location: Pittsburgh, PA 15317

Re: (Hodinkee) They Built a $100 Million Watch Empire. Then the Market Tanked

Post by HiDive » Tue Oct 15, 2024 1:46 pm

I think they have greatly overestimated the influence of Hodinkee.
Rule number nine - Always carry a knife.

User avatar
Selym
Posts: 3208
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 8:16 pm
Name: Myles
Location: Massive Two Shits

Re: (Hodinkee) They Built a $100 Million Watch Empire. Then the Market Tanked

Post by Selym » Sat Oct 19, 2024 5:23 pm

Hondinkee is to watch enthusiasts as Jalopnik is to car enthusiasts. Right?

User avatar
TLgdeL
Posts: 3832
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 7:32 pm
Name: Gee Deez
Location: MD

Re: (Hodinkee) They Built a $100 Million Watch Empire. Then the Market Tanked

Post by TLgdeL » Sat Oct 19, 2024 6:31 pm

Selym wrote:
Sat Oct 19, 2024 5:23 pm
Hondinkee is to watch enthusiasts as Jalopnik is to car enthusiasts. Right?
This
Image Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DenverBuff, Google [Bot], namor, petethegreek, raf42, Ryeguy, smellody, tmw and 487 guests