Is Tag Starting Not To Suck?

Come on in and introduce yourself!
General watch talk.
User avatar
andy tims
Posts: 2570
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 1:55 pm
Name: Andy Tims
Location: UK

Re: Is Tag Starting Not To Suck?

Post by andy tims » Mon Jan 17, 2011 2:23 pm

Oracle wrote: Image
That's fantastic & this is not too shabby either

Image

The old Heuer stuff is just sooooooo much nicer.
Last edited by andy tims on Mon Jan 17, 2011 3:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Andy

drster
Posts: 1501
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 10:22 am
Name: mark

Re: Is Tag Starting Not To Suck?

Post by drster » Mon Jan 17, 2011 2:41 pm

No, Tag still sucks.

Oracle
Posts: 472
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:55 pm
Name: Kevin
Location: Valley of the Bears
Contact:

Re: Is Tag Starting Not To Suck?

Post by Oracle » Mon Jan 17, 2011 4:00 pm

drster wrote:No, Tag still sucks.
Agree, but they have it in them to be so much better. It goes to show how much a good design team that listens to customer input can help a company. Obviously this is what they've been lacking for over a decade now.

User avatar
homathetes
Posts: 4196
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 3:01 pm
Name: Andrew
Contact:

Re: Is Tag Starting Not To Suck?

Post by homathetes » Mon Jan 17, 2011 4:07 pm

I've handled the 500m a number of times, and while it was a step forward in quality and finishing compared to the 300m (what a piece :whistle:), it's still basically an ugly design IMO. Man that bezel is just...bad. :puke:

Here's a pic showing an example of improved finishing IMO. Pic isnt' mine, but from my vast watch pron folder :shrug:

Image

User avatar
Zidane
Stevie's Nick
Posts: 3991
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 6:36 pm
Name: Nick
Location: Kennesaw, GA

Re: Is Tag Starting Not To Suck?

Post by Zidane » Mon Jan 17, 2011 4:28 pm

They need to bring back the Aquagraph.

User avatar
SCM64
Global Mod/Sinn fanboy
Posts: 16523
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:27 pm
Location: N27° 56.79', W82° 27.55'

Re: Is Tag Starting Not To Suck?

Post by SCM64 » Mon Jan 17, 2011 4:41 pm

Zidane wrote:They need to bring back the Aquagraph.
Boy, truer words were never spoken. :geek: :cheers:
Steven

Sexually Desirable RockStar Moderator

Image

Docrwm

Re: Is Tag Starting Not To Suck?

Post by Docrwm » Mon Jan 17, 2011 6:12 pm

Never said there was anything wrong with the Seiko movement because there isn't. It was simply TAG lying about where it came from that was the issue.

Many older Heuer models were really, really, nice. I never understood TAG buying Heuer and then throwing their style overboard nearly immediately. The Pilot Calculator model for example, that Pacifichrono and David (DMB) own, comes to mind as one that would sell like hotcakes if re-issued.

Image
Photo borrowed from DMB's WRUW post

User avatar
watchingyou
Posts: 1042
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 7:22 pm
Location: New York

Re: Is Tag Starting Not To Suck?

Post by watchingyou » Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:34 pm

I like the style, but it has only a 90 min power reserve with the chrono running.
Ed -

Oracle
Posts: 472
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:55 pm
Name: Kevin
Location: Valley of the Bears
Contact:

Re: Is Tag Starting Not To Suck?

Post by Oracle » Wed Jan 19, 2011 2:12 pm

watchingyou wrote:I like the style, but it has only a 90 min power reserve with the chrono running.
:o Are you freakin' kidding? What worthless chrono movement is that?!! The one in the watch in the OP?

User avatar
SCM64
Global Mod/Sinn fanboy
Posts: 16523
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:27 pm
Location: N27° 56.79', W82° 27.55'

Re: Is Tag Starting Not To Suck?

Post by SCM64 » Wed Jan 19, 2011 2:14 pm

Oracle wrote:
watchingyou wrote:I like the style, but it has only a 90 min power reserve with the chrono running.
:o Are you freakin' kidding? What worthless chrono movement is that?!! The one in the watch in the OP?

Really? :scratch:
Steven

Sexually Desirable RockStar Moderator

Image

Oracle
Posts: 472
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:55 pm
Name: Kevin
Location: Valley of the Bears
Contact:

Re: Is Tag Starting Not To Suck?

Post by Oracle » Wed Jan 19, 2011 2:20 pm

SCM64 wrote:
Oracle wrote:
watchingyou wrote:I like the style, but it has only a 90 min power reserve with the chrono running.
:o Are you freakin' kidding? What worthless chrono movement is that?!! The one in the watch in the OP?

Really? :scratch:
Obviously I'm no chrono genius, but if a chrono watch on full wind runs for 40 hours w/o the chrono running, I've read that with the chrono running they should run for around 20+ hours. Is that not correct?

Or is he talking about the measurable elapsed time? Maybe I'm just misunderstanding here. :scratch:

User avatar
nhoJ
Posts: 322
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:42 am
Name: John

Re: Is Tag Starting Not To Suck?

Post by nhoJ » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:44 pm

Oracle wrote:
SCM64 wrote:
Oracle wrote:
watchingyou wrote:I like the style, but it has only a 90 min power reserve with the chrono running.
:o Are you freakin' kidding? What worthless chrono movement is that?!! The one in the watch in the OP?

Really? :scratch:
Or is he talking about the measurable elapsed time?
:cheers:

User avatar
dshap
Favorite shirt size: Schmedium.
Posts: 8503
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 9:28 am
Name: David
Location: NY

Re: Is Tag Starting Not To Suck?

Post by dshap » Wed Jan 19, 2011 4:30 pm

It looks like the power reserve for the chrono is indeed only 90 minutes, and the PR indicator is only for the chrono.

The chrono PR is separate from the time PR, and doesn't affect the normal 42 hr PR.
-David

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AZpops, Lennox_N7, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 2288 guests