SIHH 2019 - PAM 683

Come on in and introduce yourself!
General watch talk.
Post Reply
User avatar
Panerai7
Posts: 14970
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:09 pm
Name: Art
Location: North Carolina

SIHH 2019 - PAM 683

Post by Panerai7 » Mon Jan 14, 2019 4:54 am

Getting close Panerai
42mm with 389 bezel - Finally!
Must have if you gave up waiting for a 44mm
https://www.panerai.com/us/en/collectio ... -42mm.html

Image

User avatar
logan2z
IT Admin
Posts: 10550
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:08 am
Name: Andrew
Location: SF Bay Area, CA

Re: SIHH 2019 - PAM 683

Post by logan2z » Mon Jan 14, 2019 5:12 am

I realize I'm in the minority here, but I don't think the submersible style works all that well in the 42mm case size - the 682 I tried on seemed to have odd proportions. A 44mm model would probably be just right.

User avatar
Panerai7
Posts: 14970
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:09 pm
Name: Art
Location: North Carolina

Re: SIHH 2019 - PAM 683

Post by Panerai7 » Mon Jan 14, 2019 5:21 am

logan2z wrote:
Mon Jan 14, 2019 5:12 am
I realize I'm in the minority here, but I don't think the submersible style works all that well in the 42mm case size - the 682 I tried on seemed to have odd proportions. A 44mm model would probably be just right.
Agreed!

User avatar
rockmastermike
Feedback Virtuoso
Posts: 15759
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 5:13 pm
Name: WDE

Re: SIHH 2019 - PAM 683

Post by rockmastermike » Mon Jan 14, 2019 5:28 am

Loved the 682 and this will definitely be on the list eventually and by eventually I mean pre-loved :love:

User avatar
Joeprez
Wants to see pics of your wife
Posts: 11083
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 5:36 am
Name: Joe
Location: Puerto Rico

Re: SIHH 2019 - PAM 683

Post by Joeprez » Mon Jan 14, 2019 6:33 am

Another one I want to try to see in the flesh.
Image

Image

Omega / Tudor / Rolex / Sinn / Hamilton / Seiko / Citizen / G Shock

User avatar
pbj204
Posts: 1585
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2014 10:47 am
Name: Paul
Location: New York

Re: SIHH 2019 - PAM 683

Post by pbj204 » Mon Jan 14, 2019 7:07 am

I tried the 682 and I thought it wore small, and I have a 6.5 inch wrist. The black bezel might make it appear larger visually as it extends the black dial.

User avatar
Jeep99dad
Grand-père
Posts: 26297
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:07 am
Name: Brice
Location: FlipVille, SC

Re: SIHH 2019 - PAM 683

Post by Jeep99dad » Mon Jan 14, 2019 7:10 am

I do like this one with the new bezel.

Maybe an early 2020 acquisition for me when some of my stock vests unless i win the lottery before then
Merde Alors! Et Vive Les Francais! :)

User avatar
RALAustin
Posts: 3630
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:52 pm
Name: Rob

Re: SIHH 2019 - PAM 683

Post by RALAustin » Mon Jan 14, 2019 7:28 am

Love it. Makes me glad I have not gone back to a 682 after sacrificing it for the Aquanaut early last year.

User avatar
ericf4
(TBD) Penis
Posts: 15242
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 6:04 am
Contact:

Re: SIHH 2019 - PAM 683

Post by ericf4 » Mon Jan 14, 2019 8:10 am

i kinda dig this, as for the 42mm Sub, its dimensions are perfect in all regards especially if you are small wristed like I.

User avatar
nweash
Posts: 3237
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2014 9:52 pm
Name: Nick
Location: Alta Loma, CA

Re: SIHH 2019 - PAM 683

Post by nweash » Mon Jan 14, 2019 10:01 am

Wow, 2 watches I want from SIHH. Can’t remember the last time that happened.

User avatar
BacoNoir
Posts: 2613
Joined: Tue May 10, 2016 6:33 pm
Name: Roger
Location: Colorado

Re: SIHH 2019 - PAM 683

Post by BacoNoir » Mon Jan 14, 2019 11:50 am

Any info on pricing for this one?
Image

AtomicTom
Nuclear Personality!!!!
Posts: 9357
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2012 9:59 am
Name: Tom

Re: SIHH 2019 - PAM 683

Post by AtomicTom » Mon Jan 14, 2019 12:35 pm

Awesome finds Art ! :excited: THX a lot !!!

They are perfect ! ..Classic, and sporty, but with a new edge imho ! 8-) :)

User avatar
Panerai7
Posts: 14970
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:09 pm
Name: Art
Location: North Carolina

Re: SIHH 2019 - PAM 683

Post by Panerai7 » Mon Jan 14, 2019 12:40 pm

BacoNoir wrote:
Mon Jan 14, 2019 11:50 am
Any info on pricing for this one?
No official pricing yet but being that it's not Amagnetic like 1389 the price difference between 682 and 683 will not be as much as 1305 and 1389. If I had to guess since 682 is $8700 MSRP then 683 will be ~$9500

User avatar
Axelay2003
Posts: 5328
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2010 9:03 am
Name: Gerard
Location: City of Oranges, FL

Re: SIHH 2019 - PAM 683

Post by Axelay2003 » Mon Jan 14, 2019 7:28 pm

Right on! This one marks the spot. Wouldn’t it be cool if they also had a white dial option? :love:
ericf4 wrote:
Mon Jan 14, 2019 8:10 am
i kinda dig this, as for the 42mm Sub, its dimensions are perfect in all regards especially if you are small wristed like I.
It's a beautiful world! Gerald.
ImageImage

User avatar
hoppyjr
HJ
Posts: 32272
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 9:05 am
Name: Hoppy
Location: Washington State

Re: SIHH 2019 - PAM 683

Post by hoppyjr » Mon Jan 14, 2019 9:48 pm

Panerai7 wrote:
BacoNoir wrote:
Mon Jan 14, 2019 11:50 am
Any info on pricing for this one?
No official pricing yet but being that it's not Amagnetic like 1389 the price difference between 682 and 683 will not be as much as 1305 and 1389. If I had to guess since 682 is $8700 MSRP then 683 will be ~$9500

I saw a post that showed exactly that; $9500 MSRP.

User avatar
blkgsl
Herro!!!
Posts: 3230
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:30 am
Name: blkgsl

Re: SIHH 2019 - PAM 683

Post by blkgsl » Tue Jan 15, 2019 12:06 am

logan2z wrote:I realize I'm in the minority here, but I don't think the submersible style works all that well in the 42mm case size - the 682 I tried on seemed to have odd proportions. A 44mm model would probably be just right.
My ideal is a thin 44mm submersible.

User avatar
hoppyjr
HJ
Posts: 32272
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 9:05 am
Name: Hoppy
Location: Washington State

Re: SIHH 2019 - PAM 683

Post by hoppyjr » Tue Jan 15, 2019 12:58 am

blkgsl wrote:
logan2z wrote:I realize I'm in the minority here, but I don't think the submersible style works all that well in the 42mm case size - the 682 I tried on seemed to have odd proportions. A 44mm model would probably be just right.
My ideal is a thin 44mm submersible, made by anyone but Richemont.
FIFY


Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Outlander, raf42, rockmastermike, sierra11b, TSD and 23 guests