The Dive Watch Connection

Case is 39 x 47 x14mm.

From Anders' website:

http://www.gnomonwatches.com/ocean-vint ... -exclusive

I like it, but then again I am a sucker for mil-sub homages. $500 with an ETA 2824-2 seems like a decent price point.

Not on my list as I have others that scratch this itch, but seems like a decent option for someone looking for this style.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I like it, but then again I am a sucker for mil-sub homages. $500 with an ETA 2824-2 seems like a decent price point.

Not on my list as I have others that scratch this itch, but seems like a decent option for someone looking for this style.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not too bad

Somehow seeing double...

I had the 42mm and enjoyed it quite a lot, ultimately sold it because of the size. Guess I'll need to try this one


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm diggin it!

Seems nice. If they do this with the Ti one ima attack it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I like it at 39mm.

Something about this “wrist” shot doesn’t look right. Looks more like the arm of a chair.

Joeprez wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 10, 2017 3:55 am

I had the 42mm and enjoyed it quite a lot, ultimately sold it because of the size. Guess I'll need to try this one


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Same here. This seems like a good choice.

I've always wanted to do a Hoppy (wait for it) and get a Sub, sans bracelet, to wear exclusively on a nato. With this I'll be able to know if I can do that or if I would want to get the bracelet for the Sub too. Pictures when I get it.

Joeprez wrote: ↑

Tue Dec 12, 2017 5:54 am

I've always wanted to do a Hoppy (wait for it) and get a Sub, sans bracelet, to wear exclusively on a nato.

You should. For anyone looking, here's a nice one.
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=574770

Joeprez wrote: ↑

Tue Dec 12, 2017 5:54 am

With this I'll be able to know if I can do that or if I would want to get the bracelet for the Sub too.

You won't need it. It's perfect.

14060.... perfection!

kfalk wrote:I like it at 39mm.

Something about this “wrist” shot doesn’t look right. Looks more like the arm of a chair.

It looks like a man holding the wrist of an anorexic girl.

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Was having a hard time getting a handle on the size of this thing, so appropriate to the 14060 reference above, a guy on WUS just posted some good side by sides of the Steinhart 39 and a 14060 - I was wondering how these would compare. I'm thinking this might be a good on a strap pickup (until I can get a 14060 again of course!)

http://forums.watchuseek.com/f74/steinh ... st44775997 (images reproduced below)

Funny that from above the lug to lug of the Steinhart looks longer, but not so on the profile/side shots.

Great comparison, thanks for posting. Thats my plan, to eventually get a 14060 or 14060M for nato wear.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I had one of the original Steinhart/Debaufre's in 39mm and I really liked it. I wish the caseback was flatter though.

Pictures suck, but the size works great. Very comfortable watch for nato wear. There is some play in the bezel, but besides that I like it. If you like milsubs, this is a good buy.












Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Looks great Joe. What type of music do you play/study??

Looks good Joe, and thanks for the further comparison pics. Funny I read a sales listing that mentioned some bezel play that said that this "normal" for these ... seems to be a thing for some reason.

Solid Joe! I had the 42mm, and I don't recall bezel play.

Thanks guys! I also had a 42mm and don’t remember it having bezel play. Its not a lot and the bezel lines with the dial, so its a non-issue for me. This case also has long lugs (basically same length as the Speedy which is 42), but wears nice.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk