Page 1 of 1

MB II vs SM500

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 3:07 pm
by kempoman
I owned a SM500 but overweight for my likings. I am looking at MB II now but seeking the feedback from owners here in wear comfort and price point (close to a SM500). Merry X'mas gents.

Re: MB II vs SM500

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 3:21 pm
by rockmastermike
The MBII is not thin but is thinner than the SM500. Also, I think due to the internal vs external bezel added to thickness. Going thru numerous Bremonts, I was immediately struck at how the MBII wore smaller to me.

The Lume is better on the SM500 but The MBII would be more of a daily wearer in my opinion

I love the SM500 but At the end of the day having owned both, I would like to own another MBII

Re: MB II vs SM500

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 4:16 pm
by 4pfrench
Couple quick shots of SM v. U2, which is the same case

Image

Image

Image

I wear them both quite a bit. The U2/MB is incredibly comfortable.

Agree with Mike on the other points

Re: MB II vs SM500

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 4:27 pm
by streetracer101
The MBII wore smaller on my wrist as well, but I always felt it lacked something. Overall, the SM500 was a more attractive watch to me, but I have failed to find any Bremonts with staying power despite numerous failed attempts.

Re: MB II vs SM500

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 5:01 pm
by mattcantwin
I'm very happy with the fit and size of the MBII, as well as the design.


Image


As sharp as the other versions look, I knew I would not wear those as often as the anthracite.


Down sides, not the strongest lume, as already pointed out, and a shallow lug depth.

Re: MB II vs SM500

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 5:20 pm
by kempoman
4pfrench wrote:Couple quick shots of SM v. U2, which is the same case

Image

Image

Image

I wear them both quite a bit. The U2/MB is incredibly comfortable.

Agree with Mike on the other points


Thanks for the pics. I can judge the size comparison. I am thinking more works are done in SM500 (depths, lume, etc) but price point is as competitive as MB II. Is it the anti-shock that command the price point?

Re: MB II vs SM500

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 5:53 pm
by Joeprez
mattcantwin wrote:I'm very happy with the fit and size of the MBII, as well as the design.


Image


As sharp as the other versions look, I knew I would not wear those as often as the anthracite.


Down sides, not the strongest lume, as already pointed out, and a shallow lug depth.

I've always liked that combo Matt. :cheers:

Re: MB II vs SM500

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 6:08 pm
by jimyritz
I've had the MBII, SM500, and Alt1C...I thought the MBII wore smaller than SM500...

MBII was my favorite. I didn't care for the rubber strap on the SM500 and the lume triangle never seemed to line up...Solid watch maybe a bit overpriced...

Good luck..