Seiko SBDC071 MM 200 PADI

Discussion of Seiko watches
Post Reply
User avatar
toxicavenger
President Tranny
Posts: 48109
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:25 am
Name: HeadDIK
Location: Colorado Springs

Seiko SBDC071 MM 200 PADI

Post by toxicavenger » Wed Jan 30, 2019 8:38 pm

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
1954Selmer
Posts: 3544
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2014 12:07 pm
Name: RC

Re: Seiko SBDC071 MM 200 PADI

Post by 1954Selmer » Thu Jan 31, 2019 1:43 am

Wow!
.

User avatar
Ryeguy
Posts: 5523
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:03 pm
Name: Chris
Location: Rye

Re: Seiko SBDC071 MM 200 PADI

Post by Ryeguy » Thu Jan 31, 2019 3:55 am

Does this model have the same dial size opening as the SBDX001?

I think the small dial opening of the OG MM300 makes it appear visually smaller and manageable despite being a 44mm watch.

Just wondering if this is similar.

User avatar
Panerai7
Posts: 16728
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:09 pm
Name: Art
Location: North Carolina

Re: Seiko SBDC071 MM 200 PADI

Post by Panerai7 » Thu Jan 31, 2019 4:46 am

Love it. Will have to try one of these, I'm so tired of turtle shape

User avatar
toxicavenger
President Tranny
Posts: 48109
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:25 am
Name: HeadDIK
Location: Colorado Springs

Re: Seiko SBDC071 MM 200 PADI

Post by toxicavenger » Thu Jan 31, 2019 6:50 am

Ryeguy wrote:
Thu Jan 31, 2019 3:55 am
Does this model have the same dial size opening as the SBDX001?

I think the small dial opening of the OG MM300 makes it appear visually smaller and manageable despite being a 44mm watch.

Just wondering if this is similar.
No
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
Ryeguy
Posts: 5523
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:03 pm
Name: Chris
Location: Rye

Re: Seiko SBDC071 MM 200 PADI

Post by Ryeguy » Thu Jan 31, 2019 7:15 am

Thanks, T! Good comparison photo.

This is a 44 that is going to wear like a 44 then.

I really dig the look, so much that if this was 42mm it would've already been on a plane from Japan to my house. At 44, I'm a bit hesitant.

User avatar
rockmastermike
Feedback Virtuoso
Posts: 20572
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 5:13 pm
Name: WDE

Re: Seiko SBDC071 MM 200 PADI

Post by rockmastermike » Thu Jan 31, 2019 9:31 am

Ryeguy wrote:
Thu Jan 31, 2019 7:15 am
I really dig the look, so much that if this was 42mm it would've already been on a plane from Japan to my house. At 44, I'm a bit hesitant.
Exactly right.

User avatar
mattcantwin
mattcreatestonsofwatchrelateddrama
Posts: 18559
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:53 pm

Re: Seiko SBDC071 MM 200 PADI

Post by mattcantwin » Thu Jan 31, 2019 9:37 am

Looks good.
Image

User avatar
Jeep99dad
Grand-père
Posts: 32337
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:07 am
Name: Brice
Location: FlipVille, SC

Re: Seiko SBDC071 MM 200 PADI

Post by Jeep99dad » Thu Jan 31, 2019 12:51 pm

This one looks great.
I just got the 63 version and it wears smaller than a 44mm imo. More like 42
Merde Alors! Et Vive Les Francais! :)

User avatar
59yukon01
1.21 gigawatts?!
Posts: 10507
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 8:49 am
Name: David
Location: Louisville, KY

Re: Seiko SBDC071 MM 200 PADI

Post by 59yukon01 » Thu Jan 31, 2019 12:59 pm

Besides the PADI Turtle, this is the only other PADI I've liked, or would wear.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk


User avatar
Ryeguy
Posts: 5523
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:03 pm
Name: Chris
Location: Rye

Re: Seiko SBDC071 MM 200 PADI

Post by Ryeguy » Thu Jan 31, 2019 1:21 pm

Jeep99dad wrote:
Thu Jan 31, 2019 12:51 pm
This one looks great.
I just got the 63 version and it wears smaller than a 44mm imo. More like 42
I find your perspective on this interesting given you sold your Alpina GMT due to (IIRC) size. On paper, the Alpina GMT and this model Seiko are very similarly sized with equal diameters and close to equal thicknesses.

While I think you can "trick" the eye into making a larger watch appear smaller by using a thicker bezel and smaller dial opening (as in the OG MM300), but again on this point I think the Alpina Alpiner GMT and this Seiko are pretty close.

I find the 44mm Alpina on the edge of my skinny wrist comfort zone. If it wasn't for the fact the jump hour GMT hand is so useful to me as a frequent traveler, I might've even flipped it.

Now a cynical person might think I just wrote this just so I could get you to flip your 63... ;) :whistle:

User avatar
toxicavenger
President Tranny
Posts: 48109
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:25 am
Name: HeadDIK
Location: Colorado Springs

Re: Seiko SBDC071 MM 200 PADI

Post by toxicavenger » Thu Jan 31, 2019 3:12 pm

Ryeguy wrote:
Thu Jan 31, 2019 1:21 pm
Jeep99dad wrote:
Thu Jan 31, 2019 12:51 pm
This one looks great.
I just got the 63 version and it wears smaller than a 44mm imo. More like 42
I find your perspective on this interesting given you sold your Alpina GMT due to (IIRC) size. On paper, the Alpina GMT and this model Seiko are very similarly sized with equal diameters and close to equal thicknesses.

While I think you can "trick" the eye into making a larger watch appear smaller by using a thicker bezel and smaller dial opening (as in the OG MM300), but again on this point I think the Alpina Alpiner GMT and this Seiko are pretty close.

I find the 44mm Alpina on the edge of my skinny wrist comfort zone. If it wasn't for the fact the jump hour GMT hand is so useful to me as a frequent traveler, I might've even flipped it.

Now a cynical person might think I just wrote this just so I could get you to flip your 63... ;) :whistle:
I can't wear the Alpina, it is to big. The SBDC063 does not wear like it at all.

User avatar
Jeep99dad
Grand-père
Posts: 32337
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:07 am
Name: Brice
Location: FlipVille, SC

Re: Seiko SBDC071 MM 200 PADI

Post by Jeep99dad » Thu Jan 31, 2019 4:15 pm

Ryeguy wrote:
Jeep99dad wrote:
Thu Jan 31, 2019 12:51 pm
This one looks great.
I just got the 63 version and it wears smaller than a 44mm imo. More like 42
I find your perspective on this interesting given you sold your Alpina GMT due to (IIRC) size. On paper, the Alpina GMT and this model Seiko are very similarly sized with equal diameters and close to equal thicknesses.

While I think you can "trick" the eye into making a larger watch appear smaller by using a thicker bezel and smaller dial opening (as in the OG MM300), but again on this point I think the Alpina Alpiner GMT and this Seiko are pretty close.

I find the 44mm Alpina on the edge of my skinny wrist comfort zone. If it wasn't for the fact the jump hour GMT hand is so useful to me as a frequent traveler, I might've even flipped it.

Now a cynical person might think I just wrote this just so I could get you to flip your 63... ;) :whistle:
The Seiko wears much smaller than that Alpina gmt. Not even close. It’s shorter , has a thinner case and is lighter.
Merde Alors! Et Vive Les Francais! :)

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 142 guests