Seiko SBDC071 MM 200 PADI
- toxicavenger
- President Tranny
- Posts: 48109
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:25 am
- Name: HeadDIK
- Location: Colorado Springs
Seiko SBDC071 MM 200 PADI
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Website: http://smallwhitestubbies.com/
- 1954Selmer
- Posts: 3544
- Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2014 12:07 pm
- Name: RC
Re: Seiko SBDC071 MM 200 PADI
Does this model have the same dial size opening as the SBDX001?
I think the small dial opening of the OG MM300 makes it appear visually smaller and manageable despite being a 44mm watch.
Just wondering if this is similar.
I think the small dial opening of the OG MM300 makes it appear visually smaller and manageable despite being a 44mm watch.
Just wondering if this is similar.
Re: Seiko SBDC071 MM 200 PADI
Love it. Will have to try one of these, I'm so tired of turtle shape
- toxicavenger
- President Tranny
- Posts: 48109
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:25 am
- Name: HeadDIK
- Location: Colorado Springs
Re: Seiko SBDC071 MM 200 PADI
No
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Website: http://smallwhitestubbies.com/
Re: Seiko SBDC071 MM 200 PADI
Thanks, T! Good comparison photo.
This is a 44 that is going to wear like a 44 then.
I really dig the look, so much that if this was 42mm it would've already been on a plane from Japan to my house. At 44, I'm a bit hesitant.
This is a 44 that is going to wear like a 44 then.
I really dig the look, so much that if this was 42mm it would've already been on a plane from Japan to my house. At 44, I'm a bit hesitant.
- rockmastermike
- Feedback Virtuoso
- Posts: 20576
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 5:13 pm
- Name: WDE
- mattcantwin
- mattcreatestonsofwatchrelateddrama
- Posts: 18562
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:53 pm
Re: Seiko SBDC071 MM 200 PADI
Looks good.
- Jeep99dad
- Grand-père
- Posts: 32340
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:07 am
- Name: Brice
- Location: FlipVille, SC
Re: Seiko SBDC071 MM 200 PADI
This one looks great.
I just got the 63 version and it wears smaller than a 44mm imo. More like 42
I just got the 63 version and it wears smaller than a 44mm imo. More like 42
Merde Alors! Et Vive Les Francais!
- 59yukon01
- 1.21 gigawatts?!
- Posts: 10508
- Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 8:49 am
- Name: David
- Location: Louisville, KY
Re: Seiko SBDC071 MM 200 PADI
Besides the PADI Turtle, this is the only other PADI I've liked, or would wear.
Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
Re: Seiko SBDC071 MM 200 PADI
I find your perspective on this interesting given you sold your Alpina GMT due to (IIRC) size. On paper, the Alpina GMT and this model Seiko are very similarly sized with equal diameters and close to equal thicknesses.
While I think you can "trick" the eye into making a larger watch appear smaller by using a thicker bezel and smaller dial opening (as in the OG MM300), but again on this point I think the Alpina Alpiner GMT and this Seiko are pretty close.
I find the 44mm Alpina on the edge of my skinny wrist comfort zone. If it wasn't for the fact the jump hour GMT hand is so useful to me as a frequent traveler, I might've even flipped it.
Now a cynical person might think I just wrote this just so I could get you to flip your 63...
- toxicavenger
- President Tranny
- Posts: 48109
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:25 am
- Name: HeadDIK
- Location: Colorado Springs
Re: Seiko SBDC071 MM 200 PADI
I can't wear the Alpina, it is to big. The SBDC063 does not wear like it at all.Ryeguy wrote: ↑Thu Jan 31, 2019 1:21 pmI find your perspective on this interesting given you sold your Alpina GMT due to (IIRC) size. On paper, the Alpina GMT and this model Seiko are very similarly sized with equal diameters and close to equal thicknesses.
While I think you can "trick" the eye into making a larger watch appear smaller by using a thicker bezel and smaller dial opening (as in the OG MM300), but again on this point I think the Alpina Alpiner GMT and this Seiko are pretty close.
I find the 44mm Alpina on the edge of my skinny wrist comfort zone. If it wasn't for the fact the jump hour GMT hand is so useful to me as a frequent traveler, I might've even flipped it.
Now a cynical person might think I just wrote this just so I could get you to flip your 63...
Website: http://smallwhitestubbies.com/
- Jeep99dad
- Grand-père
- Posts: 32340
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:07 am
- Name: Brice
- Location: FlipVille, SC
Re: Seiko SBDC071 MM 200 PADI
The Seiko wears much smaller than that Alpina gmt. Not even close. It’s shorter , has a thinner case and is lighter.Ryeguy wrote:I find your perspective on this interesting given you sold your Alpina GMT due to (IIRC) size. On paper, the Alpina GMT and this model Seiko are very similarly sized with equal diameters and close to equal thicknesses.
While I think you can "trick" the eye into making a larger watch appear smaller by using a thicker bezel and smaller dial opening (as in the OG MM300), but again on this point I think the Alpina Alpiner GMT and this Seiko are pretty close.
I find the 44mm Alpina on the edge of my skinny wrist comfort zone. If it wasn't for the fact the jump hour GMT hand is so useful to me as a frequent traveler, I might've even flipped it.
Now a cynical person might think I just wrote this just so I could get you to flip your 63...
Merde Alors! Et Vive Les Francais!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests