Discussion of Seiko watches
-
streetracer101
- Posts: 8787
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 6:41 pm
- Name: Mr Shackleford
Post
by streetracer101 » Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:39 am
JP Chestnut wrote:toxicavenger wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:09 am
JP Chestnut wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:05 am
It's not a size preference for me. Here's a direct shot of my wrist with my GMT2:
My wrist is around 6.25 these days. I suspect that the MM300 would look like the corduroy pants guy's watch on me.
Agreed, you have a chicken arm.
It's because my penis and brain sucked up all the growth.
I've seen weiners bigger than your arm.
The MM definitely won't fit you well. My wrist is 6.75 and I found it too top heavy.
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
-
toxicavenger
- President Tranny
- Posts: 48110
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:25 am
- Name: HeadDIK
- Location: Colorado Springs
Post
by toxicavenger » Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:54 am
JP Chestnut wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:10 am
toxicavenger wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:09 am
JP Chestnut wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:05 am
It's not a size preference for me. Here's a direct shot of my wrist with my GMT2:
My wrist is around 6.25 these days. I suspect that the MM300 would look like the corduroy pants guy's watch on me.
Agreed, you have a chicken arm.
It's because my penis and brain sucked up all the growth.
so you suck brains also? nice
-
marchone
- Capt. Obvious
- Posts: 14806
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:30 am
- Name: Wayne
- Location: NYC
Post
by marchone » Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:55 am
My ex-wife has seen bigger wieners than that. I'm just under 7 inches and I got a good fit.
only accurate watches are interesting
-
JP Chestnut
- Posts: 17821
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
- Name: Jacob
- Location: Ithaca, NY USA
Post
by JP Chestnut » Fri Feb 17, 2017 11:05 am
toxicavenger wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:54 am
JP Chestnut wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:10 am
toxicavenger wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:09 am
JP Chestnut wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:05 am
It's not a size preference for me. Here's a direct shot of my wrist with my GMT2:
My wrist is around 6.25 these days. I suspect that the MM300 would look like the corduroy pants guy's watch on me.
Agreed, you have a chicken arm.
It's because my penis and brain sucked up all the growth.
so you suck brains also? nice
No. Imagine this
But with a huge schlong too.
-
Torrid
- Posts: 6671
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:43 am
- Name: Heath
- Location: Wisconsin
Post
by Torrid » Fri Feb 17, 2017 11:06 am
Ok fair point. I could see 6.25 being an issue especially using the bracelet. Mine is 6.75 and is great on both OEM options, Crafter Blue, and NATOs in particular.
-
streetracer101
- Posts: 8787
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 6:41 pm
- Name: Mr Shackleford
Post
by streetracer101 » Fri Feb 17, 2017 11:14 am
marchone wrote:My ex-wife has seen bigger wieners than that. I'm just under 7 inches and I got a good fit.
But wasn't she a porn star?
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
-
marchone
- Capt. Obvious
- Posts: 14806
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:30 am
- Name: Wayne
- Location: NYC
Post
by marchone » Fri Feb 17, 2017 12:35 pm
I wish but no. Still, she did a Penthouse spread. As it were.
only accurate watches are interesting
-
streetracer101
- Posts: 8787
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 6:41 pm
- Name: Mr Shackleford
Post
by streetracer101 » Fri Feb 17, 2017 1:02 pm
marchone wrote:I wish but no. Still, she did a Penthouse spread. As it were.
You never fail to amaze me. Color me jealous.
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
-
dnslater
- Posts: 6810
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:52 pm
- Name: Nick
- Location: Indiana, USA
Post
by dnslater » Fri Feb 17, 2017 1:35 pm
JP Chestnut wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2017 9:39 am
That view the jubilee end link is pretty ugly. The MM300 looks great in that video. I want one, but I'm almost 100% sure it would be way too big for me. Has anyone owned one and a 42mm PO2500? How do those compare in size.
I sold my MM300 for a 2500 PO. PO wore more comfortably. Part of this was due to the more flexible bracelet and thin clasp which sits flush with the bracelet. PO disappeared easily under a shirt sleeve. MM300, not so much. Quality wise, I would put them on the same level. Lume, dial, case finish, etc.... Took this when I briefly had both.
-
JP Chestnut
- Posts: 17821
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
- Name: Jacob
- Location: Ithaca, NY USA
Post
by JP Chestnut » Fri Feb 17, 2017 1:38 pm
Thanks. The mm300 makes the PO look like a pre-ceramic Rolex.
-
dnslater
- Posts: 6810
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:52 pm
- Name: Nick
- Location: Indiana, USA
Post
by dnslater » Fri Feb 17, 2017 1:49 pm
JP Chestnut wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2017 1:38 pm
Thanks. The mm300 makes the PO look like a pre-ceramic Rolex.
MM300 case dimensions are within spitting distance of the Rolex Deepsea. Weight is about the same. Case diameter is the same. DSSD is slightly thicker because of the dome.
Photos courtesy of WUS user Daniel_hk
Last edited by
dnslater on Fri Feb 17, 2017 1:52 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
Chocodove
- Posts: 8969
- Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:35 pm
- Name: Todd
- Location: NJ
Post
by Chocodove » Fri Feb 17, 2017 1:51 pm
dnslater wrote:JP Chestnut wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2017 1:38 pm
Thanks. The mm300 makes the PO look like a pre-ceramic Rolex.
MM300 case dimensions are within spitting distance of the Rolex Deepsea.
Photos courtesy of WUS user Daniel_hk
They do wear somewhat similar based on the few times I've tried on the deep sea. I view it as my poor man's DSSD, minus the depth and tech obviously.
- Todd
-
logan2z
- IT Admin
- Posts: 11744
- Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:08 am
- Name: Andrew
- Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Post
by logan2z » Fri Feb 17, 2017 1:53 pm
dnslater wrote:
Photos courtesy of WUS user Daniel_hk
Good for you!
-
marchone
- Capt. Obvious
- Posts: 14806
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:30 am
- Name: Wayne
- Location: NYC
Post
by marchone » Fri Feb 17, 2017 2:56 pm
Brilliant size comparison. DSSD hands down.
only accurate watches are interesting
-
sierra11b
- Posts: 6309
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 9:37 am
- Name: Eric
- Location: Kalunicornia
Post
by sierra11b » Sat Feb 18, 2017 2:53 pm
These pics make it looks massive. It's certainly not a small watch but totally approachable with 6.5"+ wrist.
Here are a couple photos to help reel back in the perceived size...
-
JP Chestnut
- Posts: 17821
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
- Name: Jacob
- Location: Ithaca, NY USA
Post
by JP Chestnut » Sat Feb 18, 2017 3:52 pm
I thought the 42mm explorer 2 was big.
-
Selym
- Posts: 3057
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 8:16 pm
- Name: Myles
- Location: Massive Two Shits
Post
by Selym » Sun Feb 19, 2017 10:42 am
I just measured my MM, and it's bigger than I thought. 50 X 44 X 15 mm.
-
JP Chestnut
- Posts: 17821
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
- Name: Jacob
- Location: Ithaca, NY USA
Post
by JP Chestnut » Sun Feb 19, 2017 10:50 am
Selym wrote: ↑Sun Feb 19, 2017 10:42 am
I just measured my MM, and it's bigger than I thought. 50 X 44 X 15 mm.
That's a big watch. Clearly larger than the set of watches that slot in right above the older Rolex models.
-
jeckyll
- Honorary Assistant Jr. Hall Monitor in Training
- Posts: 11921
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:11 pm
- Name: Björn
Post
by jeckyll » Sun Feb 19, 2017 10:59 am
marchone wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2017 12:35 pm
I wish but no. Still, she did a Penthouse spread. As it were.
We all have the same enemy. The enemy is the tyranny of the dull mind. - - Tom Robbins
-
jeckyll
- Honorary Assistant Jr. Hall Monitor in Training
- Posts: 11921
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:11 pm
- Name: Björn
Post
by jeckyll » Sun Feb 19, 2017 11:01 am
JP Chestnut wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2017 1:38 pm
Thanks. The mm300 makes the PO look like a pre-ceramic Rolex.
The OS300 makes them both look like girly watches.
We all have the same enemy. The enemy is the tyranny of the dull mind. - - Tom Robbins
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 173 guests