Yeah they're definitely using a hole maker/sealer. That's a $2K machine that makes all of the holes at once and seals them. That's why Hungarian guy had a problem with holes 'cause he obviously didn't want to spend that kinda money for just holes.andrema wrote:Here is a look at the holes and hardware.
Good deal on NATO
Re: Good deal on NATO
- james80
- Posts: 3443
- Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 1:56 pm
- Name: James
- Location: A Brit lost in the Caribbean
Re: Good deal on NATO
I'd also like to know?JP Chestnut wrote:^^^ How did you take those shots?
- andrema
- Bean Counter Extraordinaire
- Posts: 14535
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:04 pm
- Name: William Drayton, Jr.
- Location: Gone
Re: Good deal on NATO
iphone with Moment case & lensJP Chestnut wrote:^^^ How did you take those shots?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Good deal on NATO
Well I wouldn't spend that kind of money just for the hole either.Panerai7 wrote:Yeah they're definitely using a hole maker/sealer. That's a $2K machine that makes all of the holes at once and seals them. That's why Hungarian guy had a problem with holes 'cause he obviously didn't want to spend that kinda money for just holes.andrema wrote:Here is a look at the holes and hardware.
The Hapa
Re: Good deal on NATO
Panerai7 wrote:Yeah they're definitely using a hole maker/sealer. That's a $2K machine that makes all of the holes at once and seals them. That's why Hungarian guy had a problem with holes 'cause he obviously didn't want to spend that kinda money for just holes.andrema wrote:Here is a look at the holes and hardware.
I prefer to use an existing hole, but I'll need a little blue pill if I'm gonna punch a new one.
Re: Good deal on NATO
Does yours make a hole and seals it with one penetration?hoppyjr wrote:Panerai7 wrote:Yeah they're definitely using a hole maker/sealer. That's a $2K machine that makes all of the holes at once and seals them. That's why Hungarian guy had a problem with holes 'cause he obviously didn't want to spend that kinda money for just holes.andrema wrote:Here is a look at the holes and hardware.
I prefer to use an existing hole, but I'll need a little blue pill if I'm gonna punch a new one.
Good deal on NATO
These Bonds kind of suck. They are too short and the hardware is too roomy to keep the strap tucked back. I'll be cutting mine up for the hardware I think.
"It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever."
David St. Hubbins
David St. Hubbins
Re: Good deal on NATO
Buckle is already removable. Still waiting on the seatbelt ones.CGSshorty wrote:These Bonds kind of suck. They are too short and the hardware is too roomy to keep the strap tucked back. I'll be cutting mine up for the hardware I think.
- toxicavenger
- President Tranny
- Posts: 48115
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:25 am
- Name: HeadDIK
- Location: Colorado Springs
Re: Good deal on NATO
They say 300mm, are they not?CGSshorty wrote:These Bonds kind of suck. They are too short and the hardware is too roomy to keep the strap tucked back. I'll be cutting mine up for the hardware I think.
Website: http://smallwhitestubbies.com/
Re: Good deal on NATO
The keepers are spaced weird. The 6:00 needs to be moved higher toward the lugs and the tail keepers are spaced a little further apart then what I'm used to. I do like the hardware.
Re: Good deal on NATO
toxicavenger wrote:They say 300mm, are they not?CGSshorty wrote:These Bonds kind of suck. They are too short and the hardware is too roomy to keep the strap tucked back. I'll be cutting mine up for the hardware I think.
Kelly nailed it. They are long enough but there is a huge gap between the keepers.kfalk wrote:The keepers are spaced weird. The 6:00 needs to be moved higher toward the lugs and the tail keepers are spaced a little further apart then what I'm used to. I do like the hardware.
"It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever."
David St. Hubbins
David St. Hubbins
Re: Good deal on NATO
My WatchGecko seat belt natos arrived today. Here are some shots on PO and CWC.
This exact material with Terry's hardware (and old style non-spring bar buckle) would be outstanding. 50% thicker would be even better. The material is very soft, so heavier watches will sag unless pulled very tight. I believe these are 1.2 thick, but 1.8 would be ideal, and they'd still be soft.
Either way, they look great.
This exact material with Terry's hardware (and old style non-spring bar buckle) would be outstanding. 50% thicker would be even better. The material is very soft, so heavier watches will sag unless pulled very tight. I believe these are 1.2 thick, but 1.8 would be ideal, and they'd still be soft.
Either way, they look great.
- streetracer101
- Posts: 8787
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 6:41 pm
- Name: Mr Shackleford
Re: Good deal on NATO
I agree. They suck. The fabric is different then their standard zulu divers...not very soft. The spacing is weird...too long on the keeper end and too short on the strap hole(s) side. I have 6.5" wrist and don't have enough to tuck under both keepers. If these go into production, I doubt they'll sell well at any price.CGSshorty wrote:toxicavenger wrote:They say 300mm, are they not?CGSshorty wrote:These Bonds kind of suck. They are too short and the hardware is too roomy to keep the strap tucked back. I'll be cutting mine up for the hardware I think.Kelly nailed it. They are long enough but there is a huge gap between the keepers.kfalk wrote:The keepers are spaced weird. The 6:00 needs to be moved higher toward the lugs and the tail keepers are spaced a little further apart then what I'm used to. I do like the hardware.
Re: Good deal on NATO
I've been wearing it on and off for a few days and I don't like them any better. The keepers are enormous compared to the Toxic or Timefactors hardware. They would work well on a leather NATO but are too roomy for nylon.streetracer101 wrote:I agree. They suck. The fabric is different then their standard zulu divers...not very soft. The spacing is weird...too long on the keeper end and too short on the strap hole(s) side. I have 6.5" wrist and don't have enough to tuck under both keepers. If these go into production, I doubt they'll sell well at any price.CGSshorty wrote:toxicavenger wrote:They say 300mm, are they not?CGSshorty wrote:These Bonds kind of suck. They are too short and the hardware is too roomy to keep the strap tucked back. I'll be cutting mine up for the hardware I think.Kelly nailed it. They are long enough but there is a huge gap between the keepers.kfalk wrote:The keepers are spaced weird. The 6:00 needs to be moved higher toward the lugs and the tail keepers are spaced a little further apart then what I'm used to. I do like the hardware.
"It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever."
David St. Hubbins
David St. Hubbins
Re: Good deal on NATO
Can't wait to get that seatbelt. Will swap hardware to Terry's square hardware.
- streetracer101
- Posts: 8787
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 6:41 pm
- Name: Mr Shackleford
Re: Good deal on NATO
CGSshorty wrote:I've been wearing it on and off for a few days and I don't like them any better. The keepers are enormous compared to the Toxic or Timefactors hardware. They would work well on a leather NATO but are too roomy for nylon.streetracer101 wrote:I agree. They suck. The fabric is different then their standard zulu divers...not very soft. The spacing is weird...too long on the keeper end and too short on the strap hole(s) side. I have 6.5" wrist and don't have enough to tuck under both keepers. If these go into production, I doubt they'll sell well at any price.CGSshorty wrote:toxicavenger wrote:They say 300mm, are they not?CGSshorty wrote:These Bonds kind of suck. They are too short and the hardware is too roomy to keep the strap tucked back. I'll be cutting mine up for the hardware I think.Kelly nailed it. They are long enough but there is a huge gap between the keepers.kfalk wrote:The keepers are spaced weird. The 6:00 needs to be moved higher toward the lugs and the tail keepers are spaced a little further apart then what I'm used to. I do like the hardware.
I noticed that too. At first I thought the strap was too thin, but given how stiff it is, increasing the thickness to match the hardware seems bad.
Re: Good deal on NATO
I find the keepers on the seat belt Nato too far apart too (6-12 keepers). I told them so in an email.
- blowfish89
- Posts: 2022
- Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 7:25 pm
Re: Good deal on NATO
On the zuludiver natos, the last steel keeper (nearest to buckle) is movable, so you can adjust it to where you want it. Is it not the same for the seatbelt ones?
Re: Good deal on NATO
It's not, thankfully.blowfish89 wrote:On the zuludiver natos, the last steel keeper (nearest to buckle) is movable, so you can adjust it to where you want it. Is it not the same for the seatbelt ones?
I'm talking the space between the keepers nearest the watch head.
Most watches will certainly be under 54mm, especially in 20mm size. These are farther apart that the ones on a Maratac or Natostrapco. It lays on the wrist better when closer together.
- Jeep99dad
- Grand-père
- Posts: 32357
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:07 am
- Name: Brice
- Location: FlipVille, SC
Re: Good deal on NATO
That CWC is such a cool watch.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalkblahblahah
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalkblahblahah
Merde Alors! Et Vive Les Francais!
- toxicavenger
- President Tranny
- Posts: 48115
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:25 am
- Name: HeadDIK
- Location: Colorado Springs
Re: Good deal on NATO
The one Timefactors sells in 1.5-1.6mm, so you might want to check it out. It is not very flexible when it is that thick. Also it barely makes it through the keepers if you fold it back.hoppyjr wrote:My WatchGecko seat belt natos arrived today. Here are some shots on PO and CWC.
This exact material with Terry's hardware (and old style non-spring bar buckle) would be outstanding. 50% thicker would be even better. The material is very soft, so heavier watches will sag unless pulled very tight. I believe these are 1.2 thick, but 1.8 would be ideal, and they'd still be soft.
Either way, they look great.
I honestly will probably never carry a seatbelt material strap. It is to rich for my blood and it is hard enough getting people to pay $50 for a top notch Roo strap. I don't think I would sell many $30 natos.
Website: http://smallwhitestubbies.com/
Re: Good deal on NATO
Well, these work on the CWC and are "just ok" on the Planet Ocean, because of its weight. Maybe 1.5 could help that.toxicavenger wrote:The one Timefactors sells in 1.5-1.6mm, so you might want to check it out. It is not very flexible when it is that thick. Also it barely makes it through the keepers if you fold it back.hoppyjr wrote:My WatchGecko seat belt natos arrived today. Here are some shots on PO and CWC.
This exact material with Terry's hardware (and old style non-spring bar buckle) would be outstanding. 50% thicker would be even better. The material is very soft, so heavier watches will sag unless pulled very tight. I believe these are 1.2 thick, but 1.8 would be ideal, and they'd still be soft.
Either way, they look great.
I honestly will probably never carry a seatbelt material strap. It is to rich for my blood and it is hard enough getting people to pay $50 for a top notch Roo strap. I don't think I would sell many $30 natos.
The Timefactors ones are same material?
These can make die until you do them perfectly
- toxicavenger
- President Tranny
- Posts: 48115
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:25 am
- Name: HeadDIK
- Location: Colorado Springs
Re: Good deal on NATO
[/quote]Well, these work on the CWC and are "just ok" on the Planet Ocean, because of its weight. Maybe 1.5 could help that.
The Timefactors ones are same material?
These can make die until you do them perfectly [/quote]
1.5mm might. I thought the TF one I bought had a rough finish around the buckle holes that I didn't like. But this material is finely woven it is gonna happen no matter what. To me I don't think it would have much longevity around the buckle holes. Then if you use a lighter on these they might really go to shit.
Blushark has a nice thick strap also. But like I said they just aren't what I can carry right now.
The Timefactors ones are same material?
These can make die until you do them perfectly [/quote]
1.5mm might. I thought the TF one I bought had a rough finish around the buckle holes that I didn't like. But this material is finely woven it is gonna happen no matter what. To me I don't think it would have much longevity around the buckle holes. Then if you use a lighter on these they might really go to shit.
Blushark has a nice thick strap also. But like I said they just aren't what I can carry right now.
Website: http://smallwhitestubbies.com/
Re: Good deal on NATO
^ funny you mention this. I just finished fitting a second "satin" finished one to my Precista. I noticed the hole I needed was already popping out and wouldn't be holding well, so I took it off. I'll be sending an email to WatchGecko to see how they want to handle it. If they expect me to ship it back to the UK on my dime, then they won't ever see me again. If they decide to send a replacement strap, I'll try to burn the hole and see how it holds up. Will advise, probably later in the week.
What I need is the stock Omega NATO for my PO
What I need is the stock Omega NATO for my PO
Re: Good deal on NATO
It's a prototype Ed. They'll probably just refund the money and move on.
Like I said that hole and seal machine is expensive and need to be used on that type of webbing. Not sure if Gecko uses it but BP/Omega does
Like I said that hole and seal machine is expensive and need to be used on that type of webbing. Not sure if Gecko uses it but BP/Omega does
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 117 guests