CD2 comparison.

[toxicavenger]

Compared to a Seiko 7c43 which is the almost the same case as the SKX's and 7548. This watch isn't much bigger at all. But it looks bigger in pics.





Now next to Paul's Sinn, which just returned back from the dead.



Next to my old SKX

[jeckyll]

Agree that the CD2 feels and wears bigger than the 009

I think the bezel size vs case size makes it feel so different. Plus, the heft of the CD2 and bulk of the bezel makes it feel more significant.

Your 007 looks nice and 'used-hard'!

[SCM64]

Very interesting Terry, so basically the size of a U1? Thanks for the comparisons, based on pics I thought it was bigger as well. Looks to be just the right size.

[BSears]

Nice comparison shots, Terry. But this just confirms what I told you and what you now know. The CD-2 looks much bigger than it wears. (that's what she said)

[toxicavenger]

Very interesting Terry, so basically the size of a U1? Thanks for the comparisons, based on pics I thought it was bigger as well. Looks to be just the right size.

If the U1 had a flat caseback then it would probably be the exact size. But it has a domed caseback so it sits higher on the wrist.

[toxicavenger]

Agree that the CD2 feels and wears bigger than the 009

I think the bezel size vs case size makes it feel so different. Plus, the heft of the CD2 and bulk of the bezel makes it feel more significant.

Your 007 looks nice and 'used-hard'!

Your right

Oh and that Seiko is my ho, she does all of my dirty work.

[toxicavenger]

Nice comparison shots, Terry. But this just confirms what I told you and what you now know. The CD-2 looks much bigger than it wears. (that's what she said)

Your right in the pics it looks like it is a bulky as a MK Seal but in reality it isn't.

[jeckyll]

Terry: You need this: http://www.thedivewatchconnection.com/f ... 14&t=43822

[toxicavenger]

Terry: You need this: http://www.thedivewatchconnection.com/f ... 14&t=43822

I agree once again.