A few of my subs
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2018 6:58 pm
Pam 1305. 616. 1389
Thanks for looking
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thanks for looking
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
HTFU!
https://www.thedivewatchconnection.com/forum/
https://www.thedivewatchconnection.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=63645
682 is their best IMO. Wears friggin great.jimyritz wrote:Very Nice !!!!!---saving for the 682...
No disrespect taken. However, I feel Pam’s are made to be big bold and distinctive. I have a 7 inch wrist. I do prefer the 44 mm models as far as size goes. Thanks for looking, TonyHeuerville wrote:They are absolutely stunning, but (and I mean no disrespect) I think you need to find something much smaller for your wrist.
That's very true.. ignore me, I'm just very jealousaperna5549 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 28, 2018 5:37 pmNo disrespect taken. However, I feel Pam’s are made to be big bold and distinctive. I have a 7 inch wrist. I do prefer the 44 mm models as far as size goes. Thanks for looking, TonyHeuerville wrote:They are absolutely stunning, but (and I mean no disrespect) I think you need to find something much smaller for your wrist.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Perhaps they do but I still love them and wear them with confidencePanerai7 wrote:Good god, all of these look giant on you, where's the intro thread?
Hell ya - wear that.aperna5549 wrote:Perhaps they do but I still love them and wear them with confidencePanerai7 wrote:Good god, all of these look giant on you, where's the intro thread?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And that’s all that matters, well put! Thanks for lookingmatt.wu wrote:I have 6.5-6.75" wrists, and definitely wear lots of watches bigger than I "should", but I like what I like!