Page 1 of 1

PAM 682

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2018 8:16 am
by seagoingsailor
Curious what everyones opinion would be on this particular model? 42mm is not optimal for most. But looking at someone with a smaller size wrist. Thoughts?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Re: PAM 682

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2018 8:40 am
by ericf4
I'm looking for one.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk


Re: PAM 682

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2018 9:02 am
by seagoingsailor
Sent you PM with location of one


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Re: PAM 682

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2018 9:05 am
by nweash
Rob has one. It looks amazing from what I’ve seen.

Re: PAM 682

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2018 9:15 am
by hoppyjr
I wanted it to be perfect, but it looked like a ladies watch on me.

Re: PAM 682

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2018 9:34 am
by streetracer101
I love these, but the price needs to settle down a bit for it to be a serious contender.

Re: PAM 682

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2018 9:37 am
by rockmastermike
streetracer101 wrote:
Sat Jan 13, 2018 9:34 am
I love these, but the price needs to settle down a bit for it to be a serious contender.
exactly right

Re: PAM 682

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2018 9:37 am
by ericf4
streetracer101 wrote:I love these, but the price needs to settle down a bit for it to be a serious contender.
This ^^^^^^

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk


Re: PAM 682

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2018 10:14 pm
by Axelay2003
I wonder if they will release a black ceramic bezel one like it’s bigger sibling. I like this size, but as mentioned above, it’s competing in the luxury end at $9k.

Re: PAM 682

Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2018 9:43 am
by RALAustin
Some comparison pics and pics on a Nato. Watch case is 106 grams--almost identical to the Sinn EZM1:1. It still relatively low so works on a nato, but really love it on various canvas or rubber straps.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Re: PAM 682

Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2018 9:53 am
by Axelay2003
Thanks for posting the comparison photos. That will work on my wrist. One of my fave PAM.

Re: PAM 682

Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2018 10:00 am
by hoppyjr
Thank you! I didn’t realize it was only 106g, I thought it was much heavier.

It’s amazing how large the 114060 looks.

Re: PAM 682

Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2018 10:18 am
by Chocodove
hoppyjr wrote:
Sun Jan 14, 2018 10:00 am

It’s amazing how large the 114060 looks.
This. Almost looks bigger than the Pam.

I'd also love a 682. Great size for me.