New PAM 616 Luminor Submersible 1950 Carbotech

Post by **logan2z** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 9:34 am

Interesting watch, would like to see it in the 'carbon' before passing judgement...

http://blog.perpetuelle.com/dive-watche ... carbotech/

JP Chestnut · Post by **JP Chestnut** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 9:39 am

Perfect for the camo wearing horologist.

Post by **matt.wu** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 9:41 am

My initial reaction is not favorable.

Post by **logan2z** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 9:42 am

JP Chestnut wrote:Perfect for the camo wearing horologist.

They're out there

Post by **logan2z** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 9:43 am

matt.wu wrote:My initial reaction is not favorable.

+1

BBK357 · Post by **BBK357** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 10:42 am

Not too bad. I like it actually. Camo? I don't see camo....

BBK357 · Post by **BBK357** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 10:43 am

BBK357 · Post by **BBK357** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 10:43 am

It's like a striped SNG blade

JP Chestnut · Post by **JP Chestnut** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 10:44 am

BBK357 wrote:It's like a striped SNG blade

Which is a form of camouflage.

Jeep99dad · Post by **Jeep99dad** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 10:54 am

I like it it but would prefer a less flashy blue, a darker hue and same for the lume.
Id really have to see it in the metal.
Also Id need a 44 sub. 47 is too big

rockmastermike · Post by **rockmastermike** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 11:05 am

47mm?!?

I like Panerai (and I like this one) but 47mm?!?

and I don't want to hear that wears comfortable - that doesn't make it any smaller and just means it will be comfortable when I bang it into something

I really liked my old 024 and 000 at 44mm and would like to have another PAM one day, but not a 47mm PAM

Post by **logan2z** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 11:08 am

rockmastermike wrote:47mm?!?

It'll feel small after trying on the new 52mm Mare Nostrum

http://blog.perpetuelle.com/sihh/sihh-2 ... m-pam-603/

JP Chestnut · Post by **JP Chestnut** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 11:11 am

logan2z wrote:
rockmastermike wrote:47mm?!?
It'll feel small after trying on the new 52mm Mare Nostrum

http://blog.perpetuelle.com/sihh/sihh-2 ... m-pam-603/

Besides the stupid size, which is synonymous with Panerai in my mind, I like that one. Certainly distinctive.

BBK357 · Post by **BBK357** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 11:13 am

JP Chestnut wrote:
BBK357 wrote:It's like a striped SNG blade
Which is a form of camouflage.

Haha.
True

Post by **logan2z** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 11:15 am

Apparently this is an actual picture of the box for the 60mm PAM 341 taken a UK dealer Blowers

JP Chestnut · Post by **JP Chestnut** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 11:17 am

logan2z wrote:Apparently this is an actual picture of the box for the 60mm PAM 341 taken a UK dealer Blowers

That lady is actually three feet tall.

Post by **logan2z** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 11:18 am

JP Chestnut wrote:
logan2z wrote:Apparently this is an actual picture of the box for the 60mm PAM 341 taken a UK dealer Blowers

That lady is actually three feet tall.

She was 5'4" before lifting the box.

streetracer101 · Post by **streetracer101** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 11:50 am

logan2z wrote:Apparently this is an actual picture of the box for the 60mm PAM 341 taken a UK dealer Blowers

Imagine the cost to ship that turd.

BBK357 · Post by **BBK357** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 11:54 am

I'd stick it in her box

JP Chestnut · Post by **JP Chestnut** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 12:00 pm

BBK357 wrote:I'd stick it in her box

She's not into your box:

just right.JPG

I'm afraid she's a size queen Ben.

hoppyjr · Post by **hoppyjr** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 12:03 pm

I like modern Rolex.
I like modern Omega.
With Panerai, I prefer older stuff and the more basic, hand wind models like 112, 113, 372, etc. the Submersibles, autos, and complication models don't float my boat much at all.

Panerai7 · Post by **Panerai7** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 12:18 pm

Was hearing about new subs coming out this year.
Kinda disappointed, no 44mm subs with in-house movts.

Post by **matt.wu** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 12:25 pm

Still waiting for that 44mm 305 everyone's wanted forever.

bzabodyn · Post by **bzabodyn** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 1:02 pm

Yup - "new age 243" but alas...

The mid-year releases blow all of these out of the water. And a high tech modern carbon-cased diver needs fauxtina lume?!??

I'm still missing not having a Panerai in my collection and since it looks like a 44mm 372 is not in the cards this year, I'm going to have to pull the trigger on a 590.

BZ

hoppyjr · Post by **hoppyjr** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 1:34 pm

JP Chestnut wrote:
logan2z wrote:Apparently this is an actual picture of the box for the 60mm PAM 341 taken a UK dealer Blowers

That lady is actually three feet tall.

If she had a flat head and bigger ears I'd marry her......

The Dive Watch Connection

New PAM 616 Luminor Submersible 1950 Carbotech

New PAM 616 Luminor Submersible 1950 Carbotech

Re: New PAM 616 Luminor Submersible 1950 Carbotech

Re: New PAM 616 Luminor Submersible 1950 Carbotech

Re: New PAM 616 Luminor Submersible 1950 Carbotech

Re: New PAM 616 Luminor Submersible 1950 Carbotech

Re: New PAM 616 Luminor Submersible 1950 Carbotech

Re: New PAM 616 Luminor Submersible 1950 Carbotech

Re: New PAM 616 Luminor Submersible 1950 Carbotech

Re: New PAM 616 Luminor Submersible 1950 Carbotech

Re: New PAM 616 Luminor Submersible 1950 Carbotech

Re: New PAM 616 Luminor Submersible 1950 Carbotech

Re: New PAM 616 Luminor Submersible 1950 Carbotech

Re: New PAM 616 Luminor Submersible 1950 Carbotech

Re: New PAM 616 Luminor Submersible 1950 Carbotech

Re: New PAM 616 Luminor Submersible 1950 Carbotech

Re: New PAM 616 Luminor Submersible 1950 Carbotech

Re: New PAM 616 Luminor Submersible 1950 Carbotech

Re: New PAM 616 Luminor Submersible 1950 Carbotech

Re: New PAM 616 Luminor Submersible 1950 Carbotech

Re: New PAM 616 Luminor Submersible 1950 Carbotech

Re: New PAM 616 Luminor Submersible 1950 Carbotech

Re: New PAM 616 Luminor Submersible 1950 Carbotech

Re: New PAM 616 Luminor Submersible 1950 Carbotech

Re: New PAM 616 Luminor Submersible 1950 Carbotech

Re: New PAM 616 Luminor Submersible 1950 Carbotech

Who is online