512

Discussion of Panerai watches.
User avatar
jimyritz
Masshole
Posts: 24448
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Name: Mike
Location: Boston

512

Post by jimyritz » Sun Mar 16, 2014 5:12 pm

Am I nuts to consider a 42MM Panerai like:

512 1940 Radiomir.

Image


Thoughts?

:cheers:
Mike

pic courtesy of Internet... :thumbsup:

User avatar
dukerules
Posts: 15055
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: 512

Post by dukerules » Sun Mar 16, 2014 5:15 pm

I absolutely love it. Would prefer it as a base, but it is awesome with the subseconds.

User avatar
kfalk
Old Chub
Posts: 11482
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 7:50 am
Name: Kelly

Re: 512

Post by kfalk » Sun Mar 16, 2014 5:24 pm

Not nuts at all - that's sharp!
Image

User avatar
Panerai7
Posts: 16728
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:09 pm
Name: Art
Location: North Carolina

Re: 512

Post by Panerai7 » Sun Mar 16, 2014 5:32 pm

Very cool watch, I'd consider it if it were 44-45

User avatar
4pfrench
Posts: 4949
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 8:28 am
Name: Paul
Location: DFW

Re: 512

Post by 4pfrench » Sun Mar 16, 2014 5:40 pm

Love it - and IMHO 42 is perfect size for Rads


Unless you have Gorilla Arms (he said looking squarely at Art....)
_____________________
paul

User avatar
Panerai7
Posts: 16728
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:09 pm
Name: Art
Location: North Carolina

Re: 512

Post by Panerai7 » Sun Mar 16, 2014 5:41 pm

4pfrench wrote:Love it - and IMHO 42 is perfect size for Rads


Unless you have Gorilla Arms (he said looking squarely at Art....)
LOL, almost as hairy too :)

User avatar
koda240
Hot Legs!
Posts: 6731
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 8:58 pm
Name: David
Location: Seal Beach, CA

Re: 512

Post by koda240 » Sun Mar 16, 2014 5:45 pm

Love the 1940 case! Not sure I would want a 42mm though. However, I would rather do 42 than 47.

User avatar
greenlightning
The Dude
Posts: 3457
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 2:30 pm
Name: Kris
Location: Texas

Re: 512

Post by greenlightning » Sun Mar 16, 2014 5:49 pm

I think it's about perfect. 42mm is a great size for the rads. At least on my wrist

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk 2

User avatar
lilhoody
Black Darin
Posts: 9018
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:46 pm
Name: BD
Location: Phoenix

Re: 512

Post by lilhoody » Sun Mar 16, 2014 7:54 pm

Nope, I love it.
"Men are ruled by toys"
Napoleon Bonaparte

User avatar
marchone
Capt. Obvious
Posts: 14806
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:30 am
Name: Wayne
Location: NYC

Re: 512

Post by marchone » Mon Mar 17, 2014 9:43 am

The 1940 Radiomir 512 is hot. It's one of the few PAMs I really like. Behind the 292 Black Seal.
only accurate watches are interesting

User avatar
Knome
Posts: 1677
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:08 pm
Name: Ken
Location: Los Angeles

Re: 512

Post by Knome » Thu Mar 20, 2014 2:50 pm

I have a 512 and 372 and I love both of them. These 2 made me realize I really didn't want or need a 44/45mm PAM.
The 42mm 512 looks bigger than it is on the wrist since the dial and crystal take up most of the face of the watch and because it's so thin and light, it is extremely comfortable to wear on the OEM alligator strap. I've yet had the need to change out the strap.

User avatar
4pfrench
Posts: 4949
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 8:28 am
Name: Paul
Location: DFW

Re: 512

Post by 4pfrench » Thu Mar 20, 2014 2:56 pm

Knome wrote:I have a 512 and 372 and I love both of them. These 2 made me realize I really didn't want or need a 44/45mm PAM.
The 42mm 512 looks bigger than it is on the wrist since the dial and crystal take up most of the face of the watch and because it's so thin and light, it is extremely comfortable to wear on the OEM alligator strap. I've yet had the need to change out the strap.

we need some comparison shots!
_____________________
paul

User avatar
Panerai7
Posts: 16728
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:09 pm
Name: Art
Location: North Carolina

Re: 512

Post by Panerai7 » Thu Mar 20, 2014 3:00 pm

Would you mind posting David and Goliath together?

User avatar
rain_maker
Posts: 2493
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 9:55 pm
Name: Fred
Location: NW of Boston

Re: 512

Post by rain_maker » Thu Mar 20, 2014 3:33 pm

That's hot mike ... Not nuts at all!

User avatar
jimyritz
Masshole
Posts: 24448
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Name: Mike
Location: Boston

Re: 512

Post by jimyritz » Thu Mar 20, 2014 4:30 pm

Like it more and more although still considering a couple others... :think:
Love the lugs on the 512... :thumbsup:

User avatar
Knome
Posts: 1677
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:08 pm
Name: Ken
Location: Los Angeles

Re: 512

Post by Knome » Thu Mar 20, 2014 4:44 pm

I'll grab the camera when I get home, I work pretty late though.

User avatar
RALAustin
Posts: 4159
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:52 pm
Name: Rob

Re: 512

Post by RALAustin » Thu Mar 20, 2014 9:09 pm

I loved mine and miss it, and am halfway thinking of another one. Got for it.

User avatar
Knome
Posts: 1677
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:08 pm
Name: Ken
Location: Los Angeles

Re: 512

Post by Knome » Fri Mar 21, 2014 1:12 am

Pics of David and Goliath

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

I tend to wear the 372 a centimeter or so higher on my wrist, just because it's more comfortable there. Makes the size of the watch sit and look better there as well, so it all works out.
The thinner strap of the 512 makes me more comfortable wearing it lower on the wrist, the lack of a crown guard accommodates wearing it like this. In the end I wear each in these positions based on comfort, but it works out because lower on the wrist, the 512 looks bigger.

With the 512, you expect it to be comfortable, the lugs are small and low, and it's a THIN watch, for a panerai. So when you put it on, the lightness of the watch exceeded my expectations of comfort. It feels great when you notice it, but it's light enough for you to forget you're wearing it. It slides under a cuff easily, so I tend to wear this on dressier evenings, when I'm less likely to get myself into... shenanigans.

With the 372, I hoped it would be comfortable because of the more streamlined case over the 127, but went in with expectations tempered. However, since the lugs are low and the case kind of hugs your wrist, it was much more comfortable than expected. Most of the thickness of the case is "above" where the lugs sit, so it was surprising how well it wears.

However, I've never measured my wrist. :shrug:

User avatar
hoppyjr
HJ
Posts: 39781
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 9:05 am
Name: Hoppy

Re: 512

Post by hoppyjr » Fri Mar 21, 2014 1:36 am

I like it too. I'd wear it on a NATO :dance:

User avatar
Panerai7
Posts: 16728
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:09 pm
Name: Art
Location: North Carolina

Re: 512

Post by Panerai7 » Fri Mar 21, 2014 3:47 am

They both look good Ken. I'd even say 512 looks better on you. Thanks for posting pics :thumbsup:

User avatar
4pfrench
Posts: 4949
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 8:28 am
Name: Paul
Location: DFW

Re: 512

Post by 4pfrench » Fri Mar 21, 2014 4:14 am

Thanks Ken...
_____________________
paul

User avatar
koda240
Hot Legs!
Posts: 6731
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 8:58 pm
Name: David
Location: Seal Beach, CA

Re: 512

Post by koda240 » Fri Mar 21, 2014 7:51 am

Great comparison Ken. Amazing what a few millimeters does. Thanks for posting

ikkoku
Stink Eye Extraordinaire
Posts: 3098
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:01 pm

Re: 512

Post by ikkoku » Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:50 am

thanks for the pics...
are the sides brushed or polished?

User avatar
Knome
Posts: 1677
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:08 pm
Name: Ken
Location: Los Angeles

Re: 512

Post by Knome » Fri Mar 21, 2014 10:23 am

Sides of the case are polished on both. The crown guard/lock on the 372 is brushed as is the buckle.
the 512 has a completely polished case and buckle.


Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Last edited by Knome on Fri Mar 21, 2014 12:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
dukerules
Posts: 15055
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: 512

Post by dukerules » Fri Mar 21, 2014 10:57 am

Great comparison shots.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 228 guests