PAM 392 - 42mm Luminor 1950 Case

Discussion of Panerai watches.
Post Reply
User avatar
CGSshorty
Admin
Posts: 30615
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 5:18 pm
Location: Boynton Beach, FL

Re: PAM 392 - 42mm Luminor 1950 Case

Post by CGSshorty » Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:43 am

craniotes wrote:If it's using the P.9000, it's gonna be a real hamburger on the wrist.

Regards,
Adam
That is true. With that movement it can't get much shorter. I wonder if that will throw off the proportions compared to the 312.
"It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever."
David St. Hubbins
Top
User avatar
craniotes
Thread Pooper
Posts: 9595
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:19 am
Name: Ad Rock
Location: Manhattan

Re: PAM 392 - 42mm Luminor 1950 Case

Post by craniotes » Fri Jan 20, 2012 11:36 am

CGSshorty wrote:
craniotes wrote:If it's using the P.9000, it's gonna be a real hamburger on the wrist.

Regards,
Adam
That is true. With that movement it can't get much shorter. I wonder if that will throw off the proportions compared to the 312.
That's what I'm thinking; the 312 is already 18mm thick, which is DSSD territory.

Regards,
Adam
CAPT. THREAD POOPER
Image
Top
User avatar
CGSshorty
Admin
Posts: 30615
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 5:18 pm
Location: Boynton Beach, FL

Re: PAM 392 - 42mm Luminor 1950 Case

Post by CGSshorty » Fri Jan 20, 2012 11:38 am

craniotes wrote:
CGSshorty wrote:
craniotes wrote:If it's using the P.9000, it's gonna be a real hamburger on the wrist.

Regards,
Adam
That is true. With that movement it can't get much shorter. I wonder if that will throw off the proportions compared to the 312.
That's what I'm thinking; the 312 is already 18mm thick, which is DSSD territory.

Regards,
Adam
At least it will have a full size strap and not an emaciated bracelet.
"It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever."
David St. Hubbins
Top
User avatar
matt.wu
Wu
Posts: 27387
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:33 pm
Name: m@
Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA

Re: PAM 392 - 42mm Luminor 1950 Case

Post by matt.wu » Fri Jan 20, 2012 11:51 am

How much of the thickness is the p.9000 movement?
:htfu:
Top
User avatar
mfserge
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2012 8:20 am
Name: Serge
Location: Home of G.T.L.

Re: PAM 392 - 42mm Luminor 1950 Case

Post by mfserge » Mon Jan 30, 2012 7:31 pm

I love that Panerai has now made the 1950 style case in 42mm. I had a 312 and 359, sold em both because they were bit too thick and didn't sit right on my wrist. I would have loved to have seen a 372 released in 42mm. The 372 one of the nicest Pam's ever released, just shrink it and I'm all in!
Top
User avatar
aikiman44
Tiki Extraordinaire
Posts: 7196
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 7:50 am
Name: Dr Jay
Location: Long Island, NY

Re: PAM 392 - 42mm Luminor 1950 Case

Post by aikiman44 » Mon Jan 30, 2012 9:05 pm

I'm with you on that one.
Nice avatar. :thumbsup:
"We'd better synchronize our watches."
Top
User avatar
Henryj
Bubblehead
Posts: 3562
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:17 pm
Name: Abu Shanab
Location: Abu Dhabi, UAE and Rossford, Oh. (Depends on the weather)

Re: PAM 392 - 42mm Luminor 1950 Case

Post by Henryj » Thu Apr 03, 2014 8:36 am

matt.wu wrote:
aikiman44 wrote:Probably 24.
This needs a brown dial, though.
:1:

It looks more like a 24 based on the photos at least.

And I agree, Jay. It'd look great with a brown dial and gold hands, ala the 351. I'd be even happier if they took this case and did other things with it, like a 42mm 233 or 243. :excited:
Zombie thread - take a look at the new 535 and 537. 42mm GMTs.
If someone tells you "There's no such thing as a stupid question", have him list a watch for sale on WUS.
Top
User avatar
Panerai7
Posts: 14468
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:09 pm
Name: Art
Location: North Carolina

Re: PAM 392 - 42mm Luminor 1950 Case

Post by Panerai7 » Thu Apr 03, 2014 8:56 am

22mm lugs.
So did Rob get that watch?
Top
User avatar
RALAustin
Posts: 3432
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:52 pm
Name: Rob

Re: PAM 392 - 42mm Luminor 1950 Case

Post by RALAustin » Sun Apr 06, 2014 6:26 am

Nope; ended up with the two 42mm rads instead but I am Panerai-less for the first time in a long time so have thought about this one again. Rare to see on the forums for sale.
Top
User avatar
Sidheguitarist
Man of many calibers.
Posts: 10047
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:16 pm
Name: Michael

Re: PAM 392 - 42mm Luminor 1950 Case

Post by Sidheguitarist » Sun Apr 06, 2014 11:08 am

This thread sux: 2 years, too many numbers, no pix.
darkness season
Top
User avatar
pbj204
Posts: 1307
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2014 10:47 am
Name: Paul
Location: New York

Re: PAM 392 - 42mm Luminor 1950 Case

Post by pbj204 » Sat Nov 19, 2016 7:56 pm

Sidheguitarist wrote:This thread sux: 2 years, too many numbers, no pix.
Thread started in 2012, revived in 2014, and now finished in 2016, with pics.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Panerai Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests