That is true. With that movement it can't get much shorter. I wonder if that will throw off the proportions compared to the 312.craniotes wrote:If it's using the P.9000, it's gonna be a real hamburger on the wrist.
Regards,
Adam
PAM 392 - 42mm Luminor 1950 Case
Re: PAM 392 - 42mm Luminor 1950 Case
"It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever."
David St. Hubbins
David St. Hubbins
- craniotes
- Thread Pooper
- Posts: 9578
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:19 am
- Name: Ad Rock
- Location: Manhattan
Re: PAM 392 - 42mm Luminor 1950 Case
That's what I'm thinking; the 312 is already 18mm thick, which is DSSD territory.CGSshorty wrote:That is true. With that movement it can't get much shorter. I wonder if that will throw off the proportions compared to the 312.craniotes wrote:If it's using the P.9000, it's gonna be a real hamburger on the wrist.
Regards,
Adam
Regards,
Adam
CAPT. THREAD POOPER
Re: PAM 392 - 42mm Luminor 1950 Case
At least it will have a full size strap and not an emaciated bracelet.craniotes wrote:That's what I'm thinking; the 312 is already 18mm thick, which is DSSD territory.CGSshorty wrote:That is true. With that movement it can't get much shorter. I wonder if that will throw off the proportions compared to the 312.craniotes wrote:If it's using the P.9000, it's gonna be a real hamburger on the wrist.
Regards,
Adam
Regards,
Adam
"It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever."
David St. Hubbins
David St. Hubbins
Re: PAM 392 - 42mm Luminor 1950 Case
How much of the thickness is the p.9000 movement?
Re: PAM 392 - 42mm Luminor 1950 Case
I love that Panerai has now made the 1950 style case in 42mm. I had a 312 and 359, sold em both because they were bit too thick and didn't sit right on my wrist. I would have loved to have seen a 372 released in 42mm. The 372 one of the nicest Pam's ever released, just shrink it and I'm all in!
Re: PAM 392 - 42mm Luminor 1950 Case
I'm with you on that one.
Nice avatar.
Nice avatar.
"We'd better synchronize our watches."
- Henryj
- Bubblehead
- Posts: 4566
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:17 pm
- Name: Old guy
- Location: Wapakoneta, Ohio
Re: PAM 392 - 42mm Luminor 1950 Case
Zombie thread - take a look at the new 535 and 537. 42mm GMTs.matt.wu wrote:aikiman44 wrote:Probably 24.
This needs a brown dial, though.
It looks more like a 24 based on the photos at least.
And I agree, Jay. It'd look great with a brown dial and gold hands, ala the 351. I'd be even happier if they took this case and did other things with it, like a 42mm 233 or 243.
If you put a large switch in some cave somewhere, with a sign on it saying 'End-of-the-World Switch. PLEASE DO NOT TOUCH', the paint wouldn't even have time to dry.
Re: PAM 392 - 42mm Luminor 1950 Case
22mm lugs.
So did Rob get that watch?
So did Rob get that watch?
Re: PAM 392 - 42mm Luminor 1950 Case
Nope; ended up with the two 42mm rads instead but I am Panerai-less for the first time in a long time so have thought about this one again. Rare to see on the forums for sale.
- Sidheguitarist
- Man of many calibers.
- Posts: 10510
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:16 pm
- Name: Michael
Re: PAM 392 - 42mm Luminor 1950 Case
This thread sux: 2 years, too many numbers, no pix.
Re: PAM 392 - 42mm Luminor 1950 Case
Thread started in 2012, revived in 2014, and now finished in 2016, with pics.Sidheguitarist wrote:This thread sux: 2 years, too many numbers, no pix.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests