The new 43.5mm POs are growing on me
The new 43.5mm POs are growing on me
Maybe it's the fact I'm an SF Giants fan but the new PO with the orange on black 15minute countdown is growing on me in a fun sorta way. The blue one doesn't look half bad either.
I'm I alone?
I'm I alone?
- streetracer101
- Posts: 8787
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 6:41 pm
- Name: Mr Shackleford
Re: The new 43.5mm POs are growing on me
It's just you. That model looks like a cheap mall watch.
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
Re: The new 43.5mm POs are growing on me
Nope. They suck.
"It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever."
David St. Hubbins
David St. Hubbins
- logan2z
- IT Admin
- Posts: 11744
- Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:08 am
- Name: Andrew
- Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Re: The new 43.5mm POs are growing on me
Been all downhill from here:
- JP Chestnut
- Posts: 17821
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
- Name: Jacob
- Location: Ithaca, NY USA
Re: The new 43.5mm POs are growing on me
Even if the looks are OK, which they aren't, the shitty plastic hybrid construction sucks balls.
Re: The new 43.5mm POs are growing on me
As a lifelong Dodger fan, you're alone even if only because you like the Giants.sierra11b wrote:Maybe it's the fact I'm an SF Giants fan but the new PO with the orange on black 15minute countdown is growing on me in a fun sorta way. The blue one doesn't look half bad either.
I'm I alone?
Re: The new 43.5mm POs are growing on me
Man tough crowd.
Problem is it appeals to me in the same way the GP hawk does and
know it would be doomed to flippage someday.
Problem is it appeals to me in the same way the GP hawk does and
know it would be doomed to flippage someday.
- streetracer101
- Posts: 8787
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 6:41 pm
- Name: Mr Shackleford
Re: The new 43.5mm POs are growing on me
GP Hawk is way cooler. You should be banned for using that as a comparison to Omega's piece of shit ;-)
The only commonality they share is both are stupidly over-priced.
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
The only commonality they share is both are stupidly over-priced.
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
Re: The new 43.5mm POs are growing on me
Yep. 2500D for the win.logan2z wrote:Been all downhill from here:
Retired
Key West, FL
Have a sparkling day.
Key West, FL
Have a sparkling day.
Re: The new 43.5mm POs are growing on me
I wonder how long it will take for rubberized markers on the bezel to start shining and peeling
- Jeep99dad
- Grand-père
- Posts: 32340
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:07 am
- Name: Brice
- Location: FlipVille, SC
Re: The new 43.5mm POs are growing on me
Don't like them
At all
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalkblahblahah
At all
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalkblahblahah
Merde Alors! Et Vive Les Francais!
- JP Chestnut
- Posts: 17821
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
- Name: Jacob
- Location: Ithaca, NY USA
Re: The new 43.5mm POs are growing on me
Probably after the first whack.Panerai7 wrote:I wonder how long it will take for rubberized markers on the bezel to start shining and peeling
Re: The new 43.5mm POs are growing on me
And the ceramic bezel on the 8500 will look perfect for years.JP Chestnut wrote:Probably after the first whack.Panerai7 wrote:I wonder how long it will take for rubberized markers on the bezel to start shining and peeling
"It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever."
David St. Hubbins
David St. Hubbins
Re: The new 43.5mm POs are growing on me
This is the one!425ranger wrote:Yep. 2500D for the win.logan2z wrote:Been all downhill from here:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Live fast, die young, and leave a good looking corpse.
- JP Chestnut
- Posts: 17821
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
- Name: Jacob
- Location: Ithaca, NY USA
Re: The new 43.5mm POs are growing on me
I really think the first generation ceramic PO's are the best looking. The dimensions don't work for me, but it looks like a vastly more expensive watch than the 2500 version.CGSshorty wrote:And the ceramic bezel on the 8500 will look perfect for years.JP Chestnut wrote:Probably after the first whack.Panerai7 wrote:I wonder how long it will take for rubberized markers on the bezel to start shining and peeling
Re: The new 43.5mm POs are growing on me
I agree. Everyone fawns all over the 2500s but they do nothing for me compared to the 8500.JP Chestnut wrote:I really think the first generation ceramic PO's are the best looking. The dimensions don't work for me, but it looks like a vastly more expensive watch than the 2500 version.CGSshorty wrote:And the ceramic bezel on the 8500 will look perfect for years.JP Chestnut wrote:Probably after the first whack.Panerai7 wrote:I wonder how long it will take for rubberized markers on the bezel to start shining and peeling
"It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever."
David St. Hubbins
David St. Hubbins
- logan2z
- IT Admin
- Posts: 11744
- Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:08 am
- Name: Andrew
- Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Re: The new 43.5mm POs are growing on me
I think they're both beautiful in their own way, but I prefer the black bezel, open 6 and 9, painted numerals and the thickness of the 2500CGSshorty wrote:I agree. Everyone fawns all over the 2500s but they do nothing for me compared to the 8500.JP Chestnut wrote:I really think the first generation ceramic PO's are the best looking. The dimensions don't work for me, but it looks like a vastly more expensive watch than the 2500 version.CGSshorty wrote:And the ceramic bezel on the 8500 will look perfect for years.JP Chestnut wrote:Probably after the first whack.Panerai7 wrote:I wonder how long it will take for rubberized markers on the bezel to start shining and peeling
Re: The new 43.5mm POs are growing on me
totally agree! It's a matter of personal preference but I also think the 2500 is the best choice.logan2z wrote:I think they're both beautiful in their own way, but I prefer the black bezel, open 6 and 9, painted numerals and the thickness of the 2500CGSshorty wrote:I agree. Everyone fawns all over the 2500s but they do nothing for me compared to the 8500.JP Chestnut wrote:I really think the first generation ceramic PO's are the best looking. The dimensions don't work for me, but it looks like a vastly more expensive watch than the 2500 version.CGSshorty wrote:And the ceramic bezel on the 8500 will look perfect for years.JP Chestnut wrote:Probably after the first whack.Panerai7 wrote:I wonder how long it will take for rubberized markers on the bezel to start shining and peeling
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Live fast, die young, and leave a good looking corpse.
- Americandave
- Posts: 403
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 2:44 am
- Name: Dave
Re: The new 43.5mm POs are growing on me
I'd have to see one in the flesh - I was might impressed with the quality of my PO 8500. Bezel action was amazing and the details just looked quality.
- greenlightning
- The Dude
- Posts: 3457
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 2:30 pm
- Name: Kris
- Location: Texas
Re: The new 43.5mm POs are growing on me
This. And mainly the thinner case. 2500 with ceramic bezel would be a mic dropperlogan2z wrote:I think they're both beautiful in their own way, but I prefer the black bezel, open 6 and 9, painted numerals and the thickness of the 2500CGSshorty wrote:I agree. Everyone fawns all over the 2500s but they do nothing for me compared to the 8500.JP Chestnut wrote:I really think the first generation ceramic PO's are the best looking. The dimensions don't work for me, but it looks like a vastly more expensive watch than the 2500 version.CGSshorty wrote:And the ceramic bezel on the 8500 will look perfect for years.JP Chestnut wrote:Probably after the first whack.Panerai7 wrote:I wonder how long it will take for rubberized markers on the bezel to start shining and peeling
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk
- JP Chestnut
- Posts: 17821
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
- Name: Jacob
- Location: Ithaca, NY USA
Re: The new 43.5mm POs are growing on me
Or the original liquid metal LE with the 2500d. I think that LE is probably the best of the bunch, even with the 2500c, and the market seems to agree - it still sells for around twice the regular 2500d version and the later 8500 price. I expect this new one to be a total flop, with prices eventually dropping below the first generation 8500.greenlightning wrote:This. And mainly the thinner case. 2500 with ceramic bezel would be a mic dropperlogan2z wrote:I think they're both beautiful in their own way, but I prefer the black bezel, open 6 and 9, painted numerals and the thickness of the 2500CGSshorty wrote:I agree. Everyone fawns all over the 2500s but they do nothing for me compared to the 8500.JP Chestnut wrote:I really think the first generation ceramic PO's are the best looking. The dimensions don't work for me, but it looks like a vastly more expensive watch than the 2500 version.CGSshorty wrote:And the ceramic bezel on the 8500 will look perfect for years.JP Chestnut wrote:Probably after the first whack.Panerai7 wrote:I wonder how long it will take for rubberized markers on the bezel to start shining and peeling
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk
- Joeprez
- Wants to see pics of your wife
- Posts: 13850
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 5:36 am
- Name: Joe
- Location: Puerto Rico
Re: The new 43.5mm POs are growing on me
Yep, liquid metal LE is the coolest PO. I do like the the 8500, especially the dial when compared to the 2500 (raised "Omega" and orange "Seamaster"). However, having the ability to change bezels makes the 2500 a winner for me. I wear mine mostly on bracelet so the thickness of the 8500 doesn't bother me that much.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Omega / Tudor / Rolex / Sinn / Doxa / Seiko
Re: The new 43.5mm POs are growing on me
+1 to the LMLE as the pinnacle of the Planet Ocean. I'll take my 2500D and shake my head disapprovingly at the new PO design direction.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests