new smaller PO review...

Discussion of Omega watches.
User avatar
streetracer101
Posts: 8787
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 6:41 pm
Name: Mr Shackleford

Re: new smaller PO review...

Post by streetracer101 » Sat Jul 30, 2016 6:34 pm

andrema wrote:The 42mm 8500 wears nicely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It is a little thick. I'd prefer for it to be a couple mm thinner. The dial and bezel are major upgrades on the 8500, but the bezel action still feels cheap compared to Rolex, Seiko GS diver, Tudor, etc divers.

Call me crazy, but I think the gold model is kind of cool. The orange is an abomination.

User avatar
BBK357
Ban Jacobs
Posts: 28867
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 2:01 pm
Name: Vladimir
Location: Ohio

Re: new smaller PO review...

Post by BBK357 » Sat Jul 30, 2016 6:41 pm

Panerai7 wrote:
logan2z wrote:I think Omega stumbled onto perfection with the 2500. They should have quit while they were ahead.
Agreed, the only update I could think of is a matte ceramic bezel for 2500D.
That sounds like the 2500 liquid metal LE. Super rare now, pretty sure Nick zidane has one.
DEATH FROM ABOVE
:ak:

User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 17821
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ithaca, NY USA

Re: new smaller PO review...

Post by JP Chestnut » Sat Jul 30, 2016 6:58 pm

BBK357 wrote:
Panerai7 wrote:
logan2z wrote:I think Omega stumbled onto perfection with the 2500. They should have quit while they were ahead.
Agreed, the only update I could think of is a matte ceramic bezel for 2500D.
That sounds like the 2500 liquid metal LE. Super rare now, pretty sure Nick zidane has one.
Very nice, but sadly a "C" movement.

User avatar
BBK357
Ban Jacobs
Posts: 28867
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 2:01 pm
Name: Vladimir
Location: Ohio

Re: new smaller PO review...

Post by BBK357 » Sat Jul 30, 2016 7:01 pm

^^
True
DEATH FROM ABOVE
:ak:

User avatar
blkgsl
Herro!!!
Posts: 3940
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:30 am
Name: blkgsl

Re: new smaller PO review...

Post by blkgsl » Sat Jul 30, 2016 7:54 pm

logan2z wrote:I think Omega stumbled onto perfection with the 2500. They should have quit while they were ahead.
+1


Sent from Tapatalk

User avatar
hoppyjr
HJ
Posts: 39781
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 9:05 am
Name: Hoppy

Re: new smaller PO review...

Post by hoppyjr » Sat Jul 30, 2016 9:58 pm

logan2z wrote:I think Omega stumbled onto perfection with the 2500. They should have quit while they were ahead.
If they added the master co-axial motor to the 2500 it would be perfect. Drill the lugs and I'd melt.

User avatar
logan2z
IT Admin
Posts: 11744
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:08 am
Name: Andrew
Location: SF Bay Area, CA

Re: new smaller PO review...

Post by logan2z » Sat Jul 30, 2016 10:18 pm

hoppyjr wrote:
logan2z wrote:I think Omega stumbled onto perfection with the 2500. They should have quit while they were ahead.
If they added the master co-axial motor to the 2500 it would be perfect. Drill the lugs and I'd melt.
Drilled lugs? The PO case is so nice I can't imagine wanting to put holes in it.

User avatar
Panerai7
Posts: 16728
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:09 pm
Name: Art
Location: North Carolina

Re: new smaller PO review...

Post by Panerai7 » Sat Jul 30, 2016 10:26 pm

hoppyjr wrote:
logan2z wrote:I think Omega stumbled onto perfection with the 2500. They should have quit while they were ahead.
If they added the master co-axial motor to the 2500 it would be perfect. Drill the lugs and I'd melt.
You wear nothing but a black or grey NATO, what do you need drilled lugs for :lol:

User avatar
hoppyjr
HJ
Posts: 39781
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 9:05 am
Name: Hoppy

Re: new smaller PO review...

Post by hoppyjr » Sat Jul 30, 2016 10:44 pm

I've heard this before, I still like them.

I do agree; the PO case (all Omega cases?) are quite nice and holes might ruin them.

User avatar
gr8sw
Posts: 4814
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 7:30 pm
Name: Pedro
Location: under a palm tree

Re: new smaller PO review...

Post by gr8sw » Sun Jul 31, 2016 1:03 pm

just wish they'd dump the He valve already :whistle:
‘I don’t worry about a thing, 'cause I know nothing’s gonna be alright’ Mose Allison

Image

User avatar
dinexus
Posts: 1246
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 11:22 pm
Name: Zach
Location: Marin

Re: new smaller PO review...

Post by dinexus » Sun Jul 31, 2016 9:54 pm

Apex of the PO was the Liquid Metal 2500 – just perfection. 39.5 with a Master CoAx is getting warm but doesn't change the hot mess that's the dial.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

User avatar
Zidane
Stevie's Nick
Posts: 3963
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 6:36 pm
Name: Nick
Location: Kennesaw, GA

Re: new smaller PO review...

Post by Zidane » Mon Aug 01, 2016 12:57 pm

Now that the adjustable clasp works on the 2500, they're really hard to beat.

dmckean44
Posts: 99
Joined: Fri May 13, 2016 11:02 pm
Name: Dave
Location: San Diego

Re: new smaller PO review...

Post by dmckean44 » Mon Aug 01, 2016 1:50 pm

To me, it's all been downhill since they discontinued the 2254.50.

User avatar
sierra11b
Posts: 6309
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 9:37 am
Name: Eric
Location: Kalunicornia

Re: new smaller PO review...

Post by sierra11b » Tue Aug 02, 2016 11:59 am

Technically, this should be a good alternative for those in the SD4000 market.

User avatar
Henryj
Bubblehead
Posts: 4483
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:17 pm
Name: Old guy
Location: Wapakoneta, Ohio

Re: new smaller PO review...

Post by Henryj » Wed Aug 03, 2016 11:56 pm

rockmastermike wrote:I missed this from Basel and love the idea of of 39.5 PO.
I had the 42mm 8500 and it was too think for me.
The 42mm 2500 was perfect :banghead:
The 39.5 is 14.16mm tall according to the article.
Still tall for the diameter but I imagine wears much better.
Definitely going to have to try this on one.
Looking at the pictures, there is one disappointment. When they scaled the watch down, Omega didn't also scale down the He valve crown. I get that Omega won't get rid of it any time soon, but wish somebody had looked at it and shaved a couple mm off the valve crown. It looks too big for the case.
If you put a large switch in some cave somewhere, with a sign on it saying 'End-of-the-World Switch. PLEASE DO NOT TOUCH', the paint wouldn't even have time to dry.

User avatar
Axelay2003
Posts: 5916
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2010 9:03 am
Name: Gerard
Location: City of Oranges, FL

Re: new smaller PO review...

Post by Axelay2003 » Thu Aug 04, 2016 6:52 am

Henryj wrote:
rockmastermike wrote:I missed this from Basel and love the idea of of 39.5 PO.
I had the 42mm 8500 and it was too think for me.
The 42mm 2500 was perfect :banghead:
The 39.5 is 14.16mm tall according to the article.
Still tall for the diameter but I imagine wears much better.
Definitely going to have to try this on one.
Looking at the pictures, there is one disappointment. When they scaled the watch down, Omega didn't also scale down the He valve crown. I get that Omega won't get rid of it any time soon, but wish somebody had looked at it and shaved a couple mm off the valve crown. It looks too big for the case.
Good eye.
It's a beautiful world! Gerald.
Image

User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 17821
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ithaca, NY USA

Re: new smaller PO review...

Post by JP Chestnut » Thu Aug 04, 2016 7:00 am

More Omega cost cutting.

User avatar
polaco23
Actually chooses to live in Detroit
Posts: 5664
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 9:46 pm
Name: Dominik
Location: Michigan

Re: new smaller PO review...

Post by polaco23 » Fri Sep 02, 2016 7:22 pm

I keep thinking I want a beater 2500 PO on rubber. Then I remember I told myself no new watches. (That was before I bought the SMP Bond)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Image

User avatar
andrema
Bean Counter Extraordinaire
Posts: 14535
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:04 pm
Name: William Drayton, Jr.
Location: Gone

Re: new smaller PO review...

Post by andrema » Fri Sep 02, 2016 7:34 pm

andrema wrote:Their new line is a shit-show


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
^^^

I want my white dial back
Image

User avatar
matt.wu
Wu
Posts: 29836
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:33 pm
Name: m@
Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA

Re: new smaller PO review...

Post by matt.wu » Fri Sep 02, 2016 10:09 pm

Still in good hands. Dibs?

Image
:htfu:

User avatar
andrema
Bean Counter Extraordinaire
Posts: 14535
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:04 pm
Name: William Drayton, Jr.
Location: Gone

Re: new smaller PO review...

Post by andrema » Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:05 am

Dibs
Image

User avatar
Joeprez
Wants to see pics of your wife
Posts: 13851
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 5:36 am
Name: Joe
Location: Puerto Rico

Re: new smaller PO review...

Post by Joeprez » Sat Sep 03, 2016 8:19 am

matt.wu wrote:Still in good hands. Dibs?

Image
Love this one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Image

Omega / Tudor / Rolex / Sinn / Doxa / Seiko

User avatar
59yukon01
1.21 gigawatts?!
Posts: 10514
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 8:49 am
Name: David
Location: Louisville, KY

Re: new smaller PO review...

Post by 59yukon01 » Sat Sep 03, 2016 9:14 am

This Omega with white dial is best of all I've seen imo.

User avatar
Axelay2003
Posts: 5916
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2010 9:03 am
Name: Gerard
Location: City of Oranges, FL

Re: new smaller PO review...

Post by Axelay2003 » Sat Sep 03, 2016 9:28 am

59yukon01 wrote:This Omega with white dial is best of all I've seen imo.
I agree!
It's a beautiful world! Gerald.
Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 325 guests