Warning: WUS type question

Discussion of Omega watches.
User avatar
Panerai7
Posts: 16728
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:09 pm
Name: Art
Location: North Carolina

Re: Warning: WUS type question

Post by Panerai7 » Thu Mar 03, 2016 10:49 am

Thanks Jeff and Jeff :) So I'm assuming the 321 is the one that's super expensive to service? 700-800 is not insane per se but when the watch cost you 2500-3K then 800 is kind of a lot for a service, no?

User avatar
jswing
Founder, TDWC MM300 Fan Club
Posts: 8353
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 8:54 am
Name: Jeff
Location: NJ

Re: Warning: WUS type question

Post by jswing » Thu Mar 03, 2016 10:50 am

JBZ wrote:
jswing wrote:
Panerai7 wrote:Really in-depth, thanks Jeff. Narrows down to what I'm looking for as well. Because watchrecon is a mess when it comes to Speedmasters
Art, one thing to keep in mind is they're expensive to service. I normally prefer new or newish watches, but in this case I bought a 13 yo Speedy because I wanted a particular model that has a hesalite front/sapphire back. It needed a service right away, and it turns out I'll end up paying more for an older model than I would have for a new one. TBH, if I were going to buy a Speedy today, I'd just buy one brand new with the new kit.
That's a good point. I'm not sure what an independent would charge, but the last I heard Omega charges something in the neighborhood of $700 to $800 to service the 1861 movement.
I'm paying about $800 to Nesbitt's for a full service, which includes having to replace a few movement parts. I think Omega is closer to $1000 now, and with a long turn around.

User avatar
jswing
Founder, TDWC MM300 Fan Club
Posts: 8353
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 8:54 am
Name: Jeff
Location: NJ

Re: Warning: WUS type question

Post by jswing » Thu Mar 03, 2016 10:52 am

Panerai7 wrote:Thanks Jeff and Jeff :) So I'm assuming the 321 is the one that's super expensive to service? 700-800 is not insane per se but when the watch cost you 2500-3K then 800 is kind of a lot for a service, no?
Mine's not even a 321, it's an 1863 and it still costs $800. I don't even know what a 321 would cost, I'd never buy a watch that old. :lol:

User avatar
demer03
Current Forecast: Vintage Doxa
Posts: 19618
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:41 pm
Name: Mike
Location: Lake Michigami

Re: Warning: WUS type question

Post by demer03 » Thu Mar 03, 2016 10:55 am

Panerai7 wrote:
demer03 wrote:Vintage Speedy....all day every day
What are the advantages of vintage speedy over a BNIB? Besides the price obviously, you can pick up a beat up Speedy for 2k.

I mean 1665, 5513 etc, they don't make those anymore so I get that part, but the speedy looks exactly the same. You can scuff it up yourself in 6 months and make it look vintage. Is it flaking and dusting tritium, charm of breaking all the time, flooding while washing hands? Just curious since I'm currently shopping for a Speedy.
For me it's the stepped dial and the bracelet.
Old Michigan steams like a young man's dreams
The islands and bays are for sportsmen

Image

JBZ
Mr. Tasseled Loafer
Posts: 11224
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:03 am
Name: Jeff

Re: Warning: WUS type question

Post by JBZ » Thu Mar 03, 2016 10:55 am

Panerai7 wrote:Thanks Jeff and Jeff :) So I'm assuming the 321 is the one that's super expensive to service? 700-800 is not insane per se but when the watch cost you 2500-3K then 800 is kind of a lot for a service, no?
I don't know how much a 321 would cost to service. I would assume it would be more expensive since it's more complicated and older. The $700 to $800 fee would be for the modern movement (at least that's what I think Omega would charge - and good independent could probably do it for less).

Also, you're not going to find a 321 Speedy for 2.5 - 3K. The "cheaper" ones (model 145.012) in good condition are listing at around 5 - 6K, last I saw.

On edit: Other Jeff seems to be more up-to-date on service prices than I am, so I'd go with what he's saying.
Image

User avatar
toxicavenger
President Tranny
Posts: 48109
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:25 am
Name: HeadDIK
Location: Colorado Springs

Re: Warning: WUS type question

Post by toxicavenger » Thu Mar 03, 2016 10:59 am

I think movement service prices might be a little hyped for these models.

User avatar
Panerai7
Posts: 16728
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:09 pm
Name: Art
Location: North Carolina

Re: Warning: WUS type question

Post by Panerai7 » Thu Mar 03, 2016 11:00 am

Shoot, that's expensive to go vintage route then. Ben, next time you're in Charlotte area, bring your Speedy with you so I can check it out and appreciate it in person.

User avatar
jswing
Founder, TDWC MM300 Fan Club
Posts: 8353
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 8:54 am
Name: Jeff
Location: NJ

Re: Warning: WUS type question

Post by jswing » Thu Mar 03, 2016 11:02 am

JBZ wrote:
Panerai7 wrote:Thanks Jeff and Jeff :) So I'm assuming the 321 is the one that's super expensive to service? 700-800 is not insane per se but when the watch cost you 2500-3K then 800 is kind of a lot for a service, no?
I don't know how much a 321 would cost to service. I would assume it would be more expensive since it's more complicated and older. The $700 to $800 fee would be for the modern movement (at least that's what I think Omega would charge - and good independent could probably do it for less).

Also, you're not going to find a 321 Speedy for 2.5 - 3K. The "cheaper" ones (model 145.012) in good condition are listing at around 5 - 6K, last I saw.

On edit: Other Jeff seems to be more up-to-date on service prices than I am, so I'd go with what he's saying.
Only because I had to send mine for service within the last month. You can definitely get it done cheaper than what I'm paying, but I wanted to go with either Omega or Nesbitt's so I knew it would be done right.

User avatar
marchone
Capt. Obvious
Posts: 14806
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:30 am
Name: Wayne
Location: NYC

Re: Warning: WUS type question

Post by marchone » Thu Mar 03, 2016 11:02 am

Great overview Jeff. Current models Ref. 3570 solid case back with 1861 movement and Hesalite vs 3573 Sapphire Sandwich with 1863 movement, display back and sapphire crystals also add upgraded movement parts and finishing. Sapphire adds height and a cut raised edge where Hesalite is domed for a significant visual difference.
Last edited by marchone on Thu Mar 03, 2016 11:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
only accurate watches are interesting

User avatar
Panerai7
Posts: 16728
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:09 pm
Name: Art
Location: North Carolina

Re: Warning: WUS type question

Post by Panerai7 » Thu Mar 03, 2016 11:04 am

Yes, although I'm not a huge fan of plexi I realize that's the only proper way to get a Speedy, so I'm okay with hesalite

User avatar
MDF
Posts: 2221
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2010 8:45 pm
Name: Mark
Location: Chicago Burbs

Re: Warning: WUS type question

Post by MDF » Thu Mar 03, 2016 11:28 am

Thanks a lot everyone I'm learning a ton from you guys as usual! :cheers:
Regards,

Mark

User avatar
sierra11b
Posts: 6306
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 9:37 am
Name: Eric
Location: Kalunicornia

Re: Warning: WUS type question

Post by sierra11b » Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:23 pm

I own the 3570.50 but the sapphire sandwich is still all moonwatch. Being able to look at the 1863 is a nice bonus. Could always find a 3572.50.

If you need a date get the 3576.50 which is a sapphire sandwich as well with moonphase. Beautiful.

Speedy all the way. It's the one watch I will not part with.

User avatar
dukerules
Posts: 15053
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: Warning: WUS type question

Post by dukerules » Thu Mar 03, 2016 5:02 pm

Speedy is an itch every watch nerd needs to scratch. I had one for a couple of years, and i liked it much more in theory than in reality. I think the true vintage ones, while superficially looking similar to the modern ones are totally different: stepped dials and beveled subdials, along with the vintage bracelets, make a world of difference to me.

User avatar
dukerules
Posts: 15053
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: Warning: WUS type question

Post by dukerules » Thu Mar 03, 2016 5:03 pm

Speedy is an itch every watch nerd needs to scratch. I had one for a couple of years, and i liked it much more in theory than in reality. I think the true vintage ones, while superficially looking similar to the modern ones are totally different: stepped dials and beveled subdials, along with the vintage bracelets, make a world of difference to me.

User avatar
mattcantwin
mattcreatestonsofwatchrelateddrama
Posts: 18560
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:53 pm

Re: Warning: WUS type question

Post by mattcantwin » Thu Mar 03, 2016 5:13 pm

dukerules wrote:Speedy is an itch every watch nerd needs to scratch.

I had one for a couple of years, and i liked it much more in theory than in reality.
I scratched that itch twice and often think of giving it another go; cool watch to own.
Image

User avatar
sierra11b
Posts: 6306
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 9:37 am
Name: Eric
Location: Kalunicornia

Re: Warning: WUS type question

Post by sierra11b » Thu Mar 03, 2016 5:40 pm

Yep.

Sold my first for profit because I got in soon and used the proceeds for my wife's DJ.

As an aviation and space geek the choice is simple now, especially now that my youngin is as interested in aviation as I was at his age.
Image

:cheers:

User avatar
MDF
Posts: 2221
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2010 8:45 pm
Name: Mark
Location: Chicago Burbs

Re: Warning: WUS type question

Post by MDF » Thu Mar 03, 2016 6:01 pm

I guess I shouldn't have even asked this question as I love aviation especially military aircraft and several years ago I was also fortunate enough to meet Buzz Aldrin at a fund raising/charity event.

Thanks again for all this info. It helps me quite a bit.

:cheers:
Regards,

Mark

User avatar
MDF
Posts: 2221
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2010 8:45 pm
Name: Mark
Location: Chicago Burbs

Re: Warning: WUS type question

Post by MDF » Fri Mar 18, 2016 12:02 pm

Shout Out to Mark (drster) thanks buddy! Needless to say I'm quite happy!!

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
Last edited by MDF on Fri Mar 18, 2016 3:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Regards,

Mark

JBZ
Mr. Tasseled Loafer
Posts: 11224
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:03 am
Name: Jeff

Re: Warning: WUS type question

Post by JBZ » Fri Mar 18, 2016 12:19 pm

Congrats! Great watch and, of course, drster is top notch.
Image

User avatar
deepcdvr
Flipper Extraordinaire
Posts: 13267
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:29 pm
Name: Paul

Re: Warning: WUS type question

Post by deepcdvr » Fri Mar 18, 2016 5:43 pm

Congrats! Miss mine terribly :crybaby:


-Image[/url]
VR/
Paul

SI VI PACEM, PARA BELLUM

User avatar
MDF
Posts: 2221
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2010 8:45 pm
Name: Mark
Location: Chicago Burbs

Re: Warning: WUS type question

Post by MDF » Fri Mar 18, 2016 9:46 pm

deepcdvr wrote:Congrats! Miss mine terribly :crybaby:


-Image[/url]

Damn cool photo Paul, and I'm glad you're back! :salute: :cheers:
Regards,

Mark

User avatar
deepcdvr
Flipper Extraordinaire
Posts: 13267
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:29 pm
Name: Paul

Re: Warning: WUS type question

Post by deepcdvr » Sat Mar 19, 2016 6:29 am

^^^ thanks - won't be here long, though - pretty busy times ;)
VR/
Paul

SI VI PACEM, PARA BELLUM

Blackdog
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2016 6:31 am
Name: Luis

Re: Warning: WUS type question

Post by Blackdog » Wed May 25, 2016 11:47 pm

MDF wrote:I have not tried either but would like to try the new Speedy moon watch (the classic new one) or the new Auqua Terra what would you go for?
You mean that you don't own a classic Speedy yet ?!?

I'd say you gotta do something about that ASAP !!

User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 17821
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ithaca, NY USA

Re: Warning: WUS type question

Post by JP Chestnut » Thu May 26, 2016 5:45 am

The AT is a pretty generic design while the speedmaster exudes classic cool. If you buy the AT, get it cheap - they don't hold value well.

On edit: an unread necro-post where the OP picked right!

User avatar
hidden by leaves
Posts: 2218
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2014 11:09 am
Name: Anthony
Location: Great White North

Re: Warning: WUS type question

Post by hidden by leaves » Thu May 26, 2016 7:46 am

Congrats. Looks great, and is simply never a bad choice...
Send lawyers, guns and money...

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 59 guests