PO Co-Axial GMT 8605
- JDC222
- Demander of Intro Threads
- Posts: 17677
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 7:30 pm
- Name: Dave
- Location: Canada
PO Co-Axial GMT 8605
Anyone have or had one of these? I'm diggin' the size (43.5mm), ceramic bezel and GMT hand...Any input appreciated.
Whisky has killed more men than bullets, but most men would rather be full of whisky than bullets.
Winston Churchill.
Winston Churchill.
Re: PO Co-Axial GMT 8605
I tried the blue one on and it was super cool. Goofy 21mm lugs though.
- JDC222
- Demander of Intro Threads
- Posts: 17677
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 7:30 pm
- Name: Dave
- Location: Canada
Re: PO Co-Axial GMT 8605
The bracelet would stay on, so not an issue for me, I know it would be for you though....hoppyjr wrote:I tried the blue one on and it was super cool. Goofy 21mm lugs though.
Whisky has killed more men than bullets, but most men would rather be full of whisky than bullets.
Winston Churchill.
Winston Churchill.
- mattcantwin
- mattcreatestonsofwatchrelateddrama
- Posts: 18569
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:53 pm
Re: PO Co-Axial GMT 8605
Tried on one at Al's during the CT GTG; very impressive dial (it is tall, though).
Liked the fact that the bezel was blacker than the standard PO.
Liked the fact that the bezel was blacker than the standard PO.
Re: PO Co-Axial GMT 8605
I dug it a lot too.mattcantwin wrote:Tried on one at Al's during the CT GTG; ...
only accurate watches are interesting
- jeckyll
- Honorary Assistant Jr. Hall Monitor in Training
- Posts: 11921
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:11 pm
- Name: Björn
Re: PO Co-Axial GMT 8605
What is the deal with 21mm these days. A number of brands are going that route. How hard is it to just go to 22 ... ?hoppyjr wrote:I tried the blue one on and it was super cool. Goofy 21mm lugs though.
Anyway, good looking watch
We all have the same enemy. The enemy is the tyranny of the dull mind. - - Tom Robbins
- streetracer101
- Posts: 8787
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 6:41 pm
- Name: Mr Shackleford
Re: PO Co-Axial GMT 8605
I like it. Safe to assume it's just a slightly bigger (or smaller depending on which you're comparing it to) PO 8500 with a GMT hand? I loved my 42mm PO 8500...but damn it was tall.
- streetracer101
- Posts: 8787
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 6:41 pm
- Name: Mr Shackleford
Re: PO Co-Axial GMT 8605
Oh..and PS - I think you'll kick yourself in the nuts if you are trying to replace the sub-c with this.marchone wrote:One word: control.
- 1watchaholic
- Posts: 5262
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 4:55 pm
- Name: Gary
- Location: Los Angeles, CA. USA
Re: PO Co-Axial GMT 8605
I like it but would love to see one live.
- Joeprez
- Wants to see pics of your wife
- Posts: 13850
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 5:36 am
- Name: Joe
- Location: Puerto Rico
Re: PO Co-Axial GMT 8605
I tried one in an AD... very nice, but thick (thicker than the Sub C for sure). Still a nice fit, if wearing it without long sleeves.
Alongside my 2500 PO. My wrist is between 6.75" and 7".
Alongside my 2500 PO. My wrist is between 6.75" and 7".
Omega / Tudor / Rolex / Sinn / Doxa / Seiko
- JDC222
- Demander of Intro Threads
- Posts: 17677
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 7:30 pm
- Name: Dave
- Location: Canada
Re: PO Co-Axial GMT 8605
Like Terry always says, I like thick!!
Whisky has killed more men than bullets, but most men would rather be full of whisky than bullets.
Winston Churchill.
Winston Churchill.
- JP Chestnut
- Posts: 17821
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
- Name: Jacob
- Location: Ithaca, NY USA
Re: PO Co-Axial GMT 8605
Too thick and the lack of an adjustable clasp in 2015 at this price point is beyond all justification.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 136 guests