Seamaster 300

Discussion of Omega watches.
User avatar
jimyritz
Masshole
Posts: 24448
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Name: Mike
Location: Boston

Re: Seamaster 300

Post by jimyritz » Fri Nov 07, 2014 5:28 am

dukerules wrote:Yeah, Andrew's pics make me love it even more. I hated the blue when it was first released, but I've come around to it big time.
========

+1....I agree Rahul.. :thumbsup:

JBZ
Mr. Tasseled Loafer
Posts: 11224
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:03 am
Name: Jeff

Re: Seamaster 300

Post by JBZ » Fri Nov 07, 2014 6:06 am

I like it, but the white seconds hand is an odd choice, and I just can't warm to PCL's on a dive watch. I agree with Ed on the price - my guess is these are only going to appeal to a limited group of people. The prices will go down significantly in the pre-owned market over time.
Image

User avatar
demer03
Current Forecast: Vintage Doxa
Posts: 19629
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:41 pm
Name: Mike
Location: Lake Michigami

Re: Seamaster 300

Post by demer03 » Fri Nov 07, 2014 6:10 am

Y'all goofy

Image
Old Michigan steams like a young man's dreams
The islands and bays are for sportsmen

Image

User avatar
Joeprez
Wants to see pics of your wife
Posts: 13850
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 5:36 am
Name: Joe
Location: Puerto Rico

Re: Seamaster 300

Post by Joeprez » Fri Nov 07, 2014 6:20 am

Badass... I would keep my PO and get the blue 300.

But I agree that the second hand looks kind of goofy. Was it like that in the original 300?
Image

Omega / Tudor / Rolex / Sinn / Doxa / Seiko

JBZ
Mr. Tasseled Loafer
Posts: 11224
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:03 am
Name: Jeff

Re: Seamaster 300

Post by JBZ » Fri Nov 07, 2014 6:25 am

demer03 wrote:Y'all goofy

Image
Maybe, but I honestly think if you put this watch next to a PO or SMP, all else being equal, the "man on the street" is going to pick the PO or SMP almost every time. :shrug:
Image

User avatar
dshap
Favorite shirt size: Schmedium.
Posts: 8495
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 9:28 am
Name: David
Location: NY

Re: Seamaster 300

Post by dshap » Fri Nov 07, 2014 6:39 am

White hand is historically accurate.
-David

User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 17821
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ithaca, NY USA

Re: Seamaster 300

Post by JP Chestnut » Fri Nov 07, 2014 6:41 am

The blue is surprisingly nice.

User avatar
Joeprez
Wants to see pics of your wife
Posts: 13850
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 5:36 am
Name: Joe
Location: Puerto Rico

Re: Seamaster 300

Post by Joeprez » Fri Nov 07, 2014 7:06 am

dshap wrote:White hand is historically accurate.
Thanks!
JP Chestnut wrote:The blue is surprisingly nice.
Yes it is!
Image

Omega / Tudor / Rolex / Sinn / Doxa / Seiko

User avatar
Panerai7
Posts: 16728
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:09 pm
Name: Art
Location: North Carolina

Re: Seamaster 300

Post by Panerai7 » Fri Nov 07, 2014 7:18 am

Andrew's pics are better. Sandwich dial really? I'd hit the black one if it's 2500$ and 43-44mm

User avatar
logan2z
IT Admin
Posts: 11744
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:08 am
Name: Andrew
Location: SF Bay Area, CA

Re: Seamaster 300

Post by logan2z » Fri Nov 07, 2014 7:20 am

dshap wrote:White hand is historically accurate.
True, but I think it looks a bit weird :shrug:

Image

User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 17821
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ithaca, NY USA

Re: Seamaster 300

Post by JP Chestnut » Fri Nov 07, 2014 7:32 am

Panerai7 wrote:Andrew's pics are better. Sandwich dial really? I'd hit the black one if it's 2500$ and 43-44mm
I don't think it's a sandwich in the sense of a Panerai, but I could be wrong. It looks more like recessed lume plots, which someone on WUS was helpful enough to show was a feature on the original.

JBZ
Mr. Tasseled Loafer
Posts: 11224
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:03 am
Name: Jeff

Re: Seamaster 300

Post by JBZ » Fri Nov 07, 2014 7:34 am

^^^Also, my guess is that when the original watch was released, the lume on the hour and minute hands would have been white (or whiter), not patina'd (look at the non-lumed text and markers on the dial). Over time, as the lume grew darker, the white seconds hand stood out more. With this new release, Omega is making it stand out more from the get go.
Image

User avatar
matt.wu
Wu
Posts: 29830
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:33 pm
Name: m@
Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA

Re: Seamaster 300

Post by matt.wu » Fri Nov 07, 2014 8:45 am

Looks good but not compelling at all to me.

So basically the same way I felt at announcement.

If I stumble across one, so be it, but I'm not going to be searching one out.
:htfu:

User avatar
toxicavenger
President Tranny
Posts: 48110
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:25 am
Name: HeadDIK
Location: Colorado Springs

Re: Seamaster 300

Post by toxicavenger » Fri Nov 07, 2014 8:52 am

DAMN 6K for this???? No way in hell. At the 4k it looks great

User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 17821
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ithaca, NY USA

Re: Seamaster 300

Post by JP Chestnut » Fri Nov 07, 2014 8:56 am

toxicavenger wrote:DAMN 6K for this???? No way in hell. At the 4k it looks great
The current PO8500 is around the same price. That's how much in-house Omega watches cost these days. This one will settle to $4,250 or less in short order, and be a great value there.

User avatar
CGSshorty
Admin
Posts: 33925
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 5:18 pm
Location: Boynton Beach, FL

Re: Seamaster 300

Post by CGSshorty » Fri Nov 07, 2014 9:45 am

I'd love to see it on a custom shark strap like I have on my PO.
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1415382330.185082.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever."
David St. Hubbins

User avatar
toxicavenger
President Tranny
Posts: 48110
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:25 am
Name: HeadDIK
Location: Colorado Springs

Re: Seamaster 300

Post by toxicavenger » Fri Nov 07, 2014 10:20 am

JP Chestnut wrote:
toxicavenger wrote:DAMN 6K for this???? No way in hell. At the 4k it looks great
The current PO8500 is around the same price. That's how much in-house Omega watches cost these days. This one will settle to $4,250 or less in short order, and be a great value there.
I personally don't see the PO as a 6k watch either. But what do I know. :banghead:

User avatar
demer03
Current Forecast: Vintage Doxa
Posts: 19629
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:41 pm
Name: Mike
Location: Lake Michigami

Re: Seamaster 300

Post by demer03 » Fri Nov 07, 2014 10:24 am

Just wait till the price settles out, Terry....
Old Michigan steams like a young man's dreams
The islands and bays are for sportsmen

Image

User avatar
toxicavenger
President Tranny
Posts: 48110
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:25 am
Name: HeadDIK
Location: Colorado Springs

Re: Seamaster 300

Post by toxicavenger » Fri Nov 07, 2014 10:35 am

demer03 wrote:Just wait till the price settles out, Terry....
If it does drop down that low I think it is great option.

User avatar
hoppyjr
HJ
Posts: 39741
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 9:05 am
Name: Hoppy

Re: Seamaster 300

Post by hoppyjr » Fri Nov 07, 2014 10:39 am

The PO8500 is a great watch for around $5k new, but it is overpriced at $6200. If they add an adjustable clasp and the new anti-magnetic movement, then I think $6k is reasonable.

I think this SM300 would also be ok at $5k new, but it seems like it's overpriced at new MSRP.

I still wish for a PO2500 styled piece, with 2500"d" motor and NO date.

User avatar
demer03
Current Forecast: Vintage Doxa
Posts: 19629
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:41 pm
Name: Mike
Location: Lake Michigami

Re: Seamaster 300

Post by demer03 » Fri Nov 07, 2014 11:22 am

Omega in general, IMHO, has pushed up against the ceiling on their prices. I cannot, in my mind, justify a $6K watch. I know a lot of you have much more sunk into pieces, but that's my conservative old guy rearing, I guess.

Now....when this is used......I'm on it like white on rice.
Old Michigan steams like a young man's dreams
The islands and bays are for sportsmen

Image

User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 17821
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ithaca, NY USA

Re: Seamaster 300

Post by JP Chestnut » Fri Nov 07, 2014 11:35 am

demer03 wrote:Omega in general, IMHO, has pushed up against the ceiling on their prices. I cannot, in my mind, justify a $6K watch. I know a lot of you have much more sunk into pieces, but that's my conservative old guy rearing, I guess.

Now....when this is used......I'm on it like white on rice.
I agree with you. $8,000 subs and $6,000 omegas are not for me.

User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 17821
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ithaca, NY USA

Re: Seamaster 300

Post by JP Chestnut » Sat Nov 08, 2014 4:00 pm

So I just saw this, in standard SS, two tone, and Ti. The fake lume didn't look terrible and neither did the white second hand. The lugs are definitely wider than 20mm and the end link fit is typical Omega (not tight). Not only are the lugs long, but the end links stick out past the tips of the lugs. I'd say that the distance from one tip of the inner portion of the end link to the other is similar to a Rolex DSSD. It overhung on my wrist where a 42mm PO8500 or Speedmaster Pro does not. In fact, it wore larger than th BP bathyscaphe. The proportions were surprisingly off. The clasp was nice.

User avatar
sfglenrock
Posts: 2389
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 8:11 pm
Name: Steve
Location: Cape Cod

Re: Seamaster 300

Post by sfglenrock » Sat Nov 08, 2014 4:15 pm

demer03 wrote:Bullshit, Hop.

THAT IS FRIGGEN AWESOME.

Pic one is the stuff dreams are made of.

Oh, yes....you will be mine someday
Had a chance to see the steel 300 live and in person today. I thought it was extremely week done. Liked everything about it. Looked fantastic and wore very well on the bracelet. I loved the dial and the way the lume sits low in the dial, just like my old Railmaster used to do. If it wasn't for an incredibly annoying salesperson I would have stayed to take a few pics. But it gets two thumbs up from me. :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

Mike, you're going to love it. :cheers:

User avatar
homathetes
Posts: 4196
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 3:01 pm
Name: Andrew
Contact:

Re: Seamaster 300

Post by homathetes » Sat Nov 08, 2014 6:58 pm

I gotta say Mike is right about pic 1. Looks amazing.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AtomicTom, mattcantwin and 142 guests