Thoughts on 2014 Omega Speedmaster Mark II
Re: Thoughts on 2014 Omega Speedmaster Mark II
It's a bad ass piece. Lumed internal tachy. The bracelet has the push-button micro adjust that we've all been waiting for.
Only downside I can see is the thickness...It's a hockey puck.
Only downside I can see is the thickness...It's a hockey puck.
- JP Chestnut
- Posts: 17821
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
- Name: Jacob
- Location: Ithaca, NY USA
Re: Thoughts on 2014 Omega Speedmaster Mark II
I've heard less than great things about the movement. Who knows if it's legitimately problematic?
Re: Thoughts on 2014 Omega Speedmaster Mark II
Are you thinking of the old 3313 movements?JP Chestnut wrote:I've heard less than great things about the movement. Who knows if it's legitimately problematic?
- jeckyll
- Honorary Assistant Jr. Hall Monitor in Training
- Posts: 11921
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:11 pm
- Name: Björn
Re: Thoughts on 2014 Omega Speedmaster Mark II
I definitely heard bad things about the 3313. Actually thought of buying one of the broadarrows a while back but then changed my mind..Zidane wrote:Are you thinking of the old 3313 movements?JP Chestnut wrote:I've heard less than great things about the movement. Who knows if it's legitimately problematic?
Anyways, this one looks awesome
We all have the same enemy. The enemy is the tyranny of the dull mind. - - Tom Robbins
Re: Thoughts on 2014 Omega Speedmaster Mark II
I love the one with the orange accents. I tried it a few weeks ago at the boutique and I'm seriously tempted to get one. The only think holding me back is that I don't want to lose my Planet Ocean.
"It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever."
David St. Hubbins
David St. Hubbins
Re: Thoughts on 2014 Omega Speedmaster Mark II
Nice looking pieces, but for the money there are others that I'd rather have, like a Sinn 140 St S.
- JP Chestnut
- Posts: 17821
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
- Name: Jacob
- Location: Ithaca, NY USA
Re: Thoughts on 2014 Omega Speedmaster Mark II
You're right. Does anyone know how similar this and the old movement are?Zidane wrote:Are you thinking of the old 3313 movements?JP Chestnut wrote:I've heard less than great things about the movement. Who knows if it's legitimately problematic?
Re: Thoughts on 2014 Omega Speedmaster Mark II
==========Zidane wrote:It's a bad ass piece. Lumed internal tachy. The bracelet has the push-button micro adjust that we've all been waiting for.
Only downside I can see is the thickness...It's a hockey puck.
It has the new micro adj in clasp--Cool
Re: Thoughts on 2014 Omega Speedmaster Mark II
I saw these at the Omega boutique at Tyson's corner about a week ago. These are STUNNING in person. Personally I like the one with the orange accents the best but both were really nice.
Re: Thoughts on 2014 Omega Speedmaster Mark II
15mm isn't that bad. Although it does have a flat crystal and bulky case shape, so it wears that full 15mm.Zidane wrote: Only downside I can see is the thickness...It's a hockey puck.
I'm very tempted by this, but the afore mentioned Sinn with central chrono minutes SZ01 would get my money if I were in the market for one of these retro cushion case chronos.
I do wish they'd lumed every hour mark though. Missing lume plots drive me nuts:
Last edited by foodle on Wed Jul 09, 2014 6:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- JP Chestnut
- Posts: 17821
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
- Name: Jacob
- Location: Ithaca, NY USA
Re: Thoughts on 2014 Omega Speedmaster Mark II
The missing lume looks a bit odd.
- JP Chestnut
- Posts: 17821
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
- Name: Jacob
- Location: Ithaca, NY USA
Re: Thoughts on 2014 Omega Speedmaster Mark II
I'd go with the diver, even with the faux patina. It seems like a more versatile watch.jimyritz wrote: The new Mark II or the new Seamaster Master Co-Axial 300...
Re: Thoughts on 2014 Omega Speedmaster Mark II
Just found out its close to 18mm thick...
Probably now out of running..
Probably now out of running..
Re: Thoughts on 2014 Omega Speedmaster Mark II
It's 15mm.jimyritz wrote:Just found out its close to 18mm thick...
Probably now out of running..
Where are you seeing 18mm?
I've tried one on at the Omega Boutique. It's no where near as bulky as the POC and actually less thick than the Speedmaster 9300 with its stupid thick rear crystal.
Last edited by foodle on Wed Jul 09, 2014 6:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- JP Chestnut
- Posts: 17821
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
- Name: Jacob
- Location: Ithaca, NY USA
Re: Thoughts on 2014 Omega Speedmaster Mark II
That seems too big. Even so, omega is really pushing the boundaries of what's wearable every day.jimyritz wrote:Just found out its close to 18mm thick...
Probably now out of running..
Re: Thoughts on 2014 Omega Speedmaster Mark II
No way it's 18mm thick.
"It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever."
David St. Hubbins
David St. Hubbins
- mattcantwin
- mattcreatestonsofwatchrelateddrama
- Posts: 18573
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:53 pm
Re: Thoughts on 2014 Omega Speedmaster Mark II
I tried it on later in the day from Chris.Zidane wrote:It's a bad ass piece. Lumed internal tachy. The bracelet has the push-button micro adjust that we've all been waiting for.
Only downside I can see is the thickness...It's a hockey puck.
Loved the watch, but not the fit.
- 1954Selmer
- Posts: 3544
- Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2014 12:07 pm
- Name: RC
Re: Thoughts on 2014 Omega Speedmaster Mark II
The new Speedy is cool... The new Seamaster. is fantastic
.
Re: Thoughts on 2014 Omega Speedmaster Mark II
..CGSshorty wrote:No way it's 18mm thick.
Ok--that's what an AD told me over the phone..
Thanks..
Re: Thoughts on 2014 Omega Speedmaster Mark II
------------JP Chestnut wrote:That seems too big. Even so, omega is really pushing the boundaries of what's wearable every day.jimyritz wrote:Just found out its close to 18mm thick...
Probably now out of running..
For some reason all of there newer watches are 43 by 17-18 mm thick...
Re: Thoughts on 2014 Omega Speedmaster Mark II
Then you should know that it's for sure not true.jimyritz wrote:..CGSshorty wrote:No way it's 18mm thick.
Ok--that's what an AD told me over the phone..
Re: Thoughts on 2014 Omega Speedmaster Mark II
Nope. In fact the only model I can think of that's over 16mm is the POC 9300.jimyritz wrote:For some reason all of there newer watches are 43 by 17-18 mm thick...JP Chestnut wrote:That seems too big. Even so, omega is really pushing the boundaries of what's wearable every day.jimyritz wrote:Just found out its close to 18mm thick...
Probably now out of running..
- JP Chestnut
- Posts: 17821
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
- Name: Jacob
- Location: Ithaca, NY USA
Re: Thoughts on 2014 Omega Speedmaster Mark II
How thick is the 9300 Speedy? It seemed good and thick when I tried it on.foodle wrote:Nope. In fact the only model I can think of that's over 16mm is the POC 9300.jimyritz wrote:For some reason all of there newer watches are 43 by 17-18 mm thick...JP Chestnut wrote:That seems too big. Even so, omega is really pushing the boundaries of what's wearable every day.jimyritz wrote:Just found out its close to 18mm thick...
Probably now out of running..
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 207 guests