Sub 300 anniversary compared to 1200T?

Discussion of Doxa watches.
Post Reply
User avatar
3migo
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2017 4:17 pm
Name: Russell

Sub 300 anniversary compared to 1200T?

Post by 3migo » Sun Aug 06, 2017 2:08 pm

A few months back, I owned a 1200T Searambler that I now regret selling and I'm looking to get a Doxa back into my stable. I like the aesthetic of the new 300 anniversary, but not sure if I'm willing to pay the premium over something like the 1200T or 1500T even.

Curious if anyone has handled the 300 anniversary compared to the 1200T? Thoughts?
Last edited by 3migo on Sun Aug 06, 2017 2:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
http://www.gearzeit.com/ <-- Where I ramble and post reviews on watches & other gear.

User avatar
demer03
Current Forecast: Vintage Doxa
Posts: 16831
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:41 pm
Name: Mike
Location: On Michigami

Re: Sub 300T compared to 1200T?

Post by demer03 » Sun Aug 06, 2017 3:35 pm

Many times.

The T 1000/1200 series is close to the late 60's -70's 300T.

The 300 (No T) that's the current new release it a near 1:1 of the first generation Doxa 300 from 1967.

I prefer the No T simply because of it's thin case and domed crystal. It's lighter than the 1000/1200.

They all "suffer" from the new bracelet, but that's a personal opinion. Nothing beats old school rice.

Back to your question, the 1000/1200 is going to have more heft and presence. The 300 No T is light and a like wearing a piece of 1967.

All up to your personal preference.
Image
"Old Michigan steams like a young man's dreams, the islands and bays are for sportsmen"

User avatar
dukerules
Posts: 13361
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: Sub 300T compared to 1200T?

Post by dukerules » Sun Aug 06, 2017 3:46 pm

Mike knows Doxas, and his opinion is gold here. I totally agree that the 1200T feels and wears like a much larger watch than the new 300 reissue, although it is by no means a very large watch. Here is a comparison pic.
Image

User avatar
Jeep99dad
Grand-père
Posts: 23547
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:07 am
Name: Brice
Location: FlipVille, SC

Re: Sub 300T compared to 1200T?

Post by Jeep99dad » Sun Aug 06, 2017 6:48 pm

I love the 300 reissue but not on my wrist. Dial was too small and overall it wears smaller than the 1200 which is close in overall dimensions while having better proportions imho.
300 will have that vintage vibe for sure
Merde Alors! Et Vive Les Francais! :)

User avatar
BBK357
Ban Jacobs
Posts: 22973
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 2:01 pm
Name: Vladimir Makarov
Location: Ohio

Re: Sub 300T compared to 1200T?

Post by BBK357 » Sun Aug 06, 2017 7:50 pm

Loved the 300 reissue that I had, great value too. LOVED the dome sapphire.

Only issue is that I found the dial to be pretty small.
I've never owned another Doxa though.

Image
DEATH FROM ABOVE

BIG WHOOP. IM SPOONING A BARRETT 50 CAL, I COULD KILL A BUILDING.

User avatar
3migo
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2017 4:17 pm
Name: Russell

Re: Sub 300T compared to 1200T?

Post by 3migo » Tue Aug 08, 2017 4:12 pm

I really liked the way that my 1200T wore, such a nice watch. While I wasn't a huge fan of the BOR bracelet on it, it also wasn't a deal breaker.

I think at this point it's going to come down to which one I find for sale first between a 300 or a 1200T.
http://www.gearzeit.com/ <-- Where I ramble and post reviews on watches & other gear.

User avatar
mfxr
Posts: 1462
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 12:19 am
Name: MattF
Location: Australia

Re: Sub 300T compared to 1200T?

Post by mfxr » Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:25 pm

My 2 Doxas:

Sub 300 50th Anniversary vs 1200t.
doxass.jpg
doxass2.jpg
I find them both to wear really comfortably, especially the sub300 ( BOR is great IMHO ).
Obviously the 1200t wears a bit taller, and has a larger more open dial.
The Sub300 wears quite slim, being very true to vintage and has a small dial comparatively.

As Mike said 300T is a different model again, but I have never had one of those.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
3migo
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2017 4:17 pm
Name: Russell

Re: Sub 300 anniversary compared to 1200T?

Post by 3migo » Wed Aug 09, 2017 4:09 pm

Interesting, I didn't realize that the 300 was that much thinner than the 1200T. But after seeing everyone's photos, I'm really loving the domed crystal on the 300. I really enjoyed my old 1200T Searambler, but I think a Sub 300 'Rambler is in my future soon... The hunt begins.
http://www.gearzeit.com/ <-- Where I ramble and post reviews on watches & other gear.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests