126600

Discussion of Rolex Watches.
User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 14949
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ann Arbor, MI USA

Re: 126600

Post by JP Chestnut » Thu Feb 08, 2018 2:02 pm

Panerai7 wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 1:49 pm
rockmastermike wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 11:21 am
Image

If I could afford one I'd get one of these - Rolex retail strategies be damned

Image
Believe it or not this one actually made it to our AD, I saw it, that green text is just ugh... Get a normal Black one :thumbsup:
The Durp Sea. That text is supposed to be a submarine going to the dark zone.

User avatar
rockmastermike
Feedback Virtuoso
Posts: 14975
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 5:13 pm
Name: WDE

Re: 126600

Post by rockmastermike » Thu Feb 08, 2018 2:29 pm

Panerai7 wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 1:49 pm
rockmastermike wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 11:21 am
Image

If I could afford one I'd get one of these - Rolex retail strategies be damned

Image
Believe it or not this one actually made it to our AD, I saw it, that green text is just ugh... Get a normal Black one :thumbsup:
I’d have to try both on before hand for sure if I ever get that far
"Welcome to the X-Men Bobby Drake. Hope you survive the experience"

User avatar
Zidane
Stevie's Nick
Posts: 3579
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 6:36 pm
Name: Nick
Location: Dallas, GA

Re: 126600

Post by Zidane » Thu Feb 08, 2018 4:28 pm

JP Chestnut wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 9:21 am
Seppia wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 9:05 am
Panerai7 wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 8:18 am
JP Chestnut wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 8:13 am

This is on the Rolex radar - RSC NY is requiring an original purchase receipt for warranty work with a non-USA stamped warranty card. I'm sure Dallas and BH aren't far behind.
That's good.
Mhhhh.
partially unrelated, but I personally hate the "non transferable warranty" policy.
I find it completely BS, why shouldn't the warranty be valid if i bought second hand?
#fakenews

It is transferable. It just can't pass through a reseller before entering the hands of the first customer, which is 100% reasonable. The receipt doesn't have to be in your name. But good luck getting David SW to give you an original purchase receipt!
That's incorrect from what I understand. I looked at financing a well respected jeweler (100 years in business) last year; a Rolex and Patek dealer among others. The head of their watch division informed me that Rolex changed the policy about a year ago. The new protocol is for every AD to take a picture/scan of the original warranty card, fully filled out with the original buyers info and send it into Rolex. After that, if the warranty is called into action, the owner must be the original buyer listed on the warranty card for Rolex to cover it as it's cross-referenced.

Not sure if that's actually being done by "the book" so to speak, but that's the new protocol.

User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 14949
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ann Arbor, MI USA

Re: 126600

Post by JP Chestnut » Thu Feb 08, 2018 4:36 pm

Zidane wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 4:28 pm
JP Chestnut wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 9:21 am
Seppia wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 9:05 am
Panerai7 wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 8:18 am
JP Chestnut wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 8:13 am

This is on the Rolex radar - RSC NY is requiring an original purchase receipt for warranty work with a non-USA stamped warranty card. I'm sure Dallas and BH aren't far behind.
That's good.
Mhhhh.
partially unrelated, but I personally hate the "non transferable warranty" policy.
I find it completely BS, why shouldn't the warranty be valid if i bought second hand?
#fakenews

It is transferable. It just can't pass through a reseller before entering the hands of the first customer, which is 100% reasonable. The receipt doesn't have to be in your name. But good luck getting David SW to give you an original purchase receipt!
That's incorrect from what I understand. I looked at financing a well respected jeweler (100 years in business) last year; a Rolex and Patek dealer among others. The head of their watch division informed me that Rolex changed the policy about a year ago. The new protocol is for every AD to take a picture/scan of the original warranty card, fully filled out with the original buyers info and send it into Rolex. After that, if the warranty is called into action, the owner must be the original buyer listed on the warranty card for Rolex to cover it as it's cross-referenced.

Not sure if that's actually being done by "the book" so to speak, but that's the new protocol.
That may be the behind the scenes set up, but the Rolex warranty is a full warranty. Full warranties have specific legal obligations. One of which is being transferable. This is all defined by the MAGNUSON-MOSS WARRANTY ACT:
https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/busines ... nuson-Moss

I looked into this last year. Per the current wording of the Rolex warranty it's a full warranty and is consequently transferable. The only qualifying language is about it being sold first to an individual (not a reseller).

Rolex would be subject to a class action lawsuit if they could be shown to be doing what you say. I wish Jeff were still around - this is right up his alley.

User avatar
BBK357
Ban Jacobs
Posts: 23912
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 2:01 pm
Name: Vladimir Makarov
Location: Ohio

Re: 126600

Post by BBK357 » Thu Feb 08, 2018 4:49 pm

Panerai7 wrote:
BBK357 wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 12:22 pm
JP Chestnut wrote:
BBK357 wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 11:11 am
About the whole taking the stickers off deal, Art, I can confirm that not all ADs do that. I picked up a brand new no date from an AD here and I was asked to get the bracelet sized. After I told them no thanks, they handed it over bagged up and that was that. All stickers intact.
When was that?

A couple years ago... I picked it up for someone
Oh that's old news Ben, unfortunately.
I did that as well a few years ago with DSSD and with Pelagos 2 years ago. But last November even BBB that I bought was stripped off all of the plastic :(
And also, my AD was apologetic but he asked for my Drivers License to fill out the card and register me with Tudor/Rolex.

That is insane.
You can vote in most states without ID but when you buy a Rolex/Tudor you need it, lolz
DEATH FROM ABOVE
:ak:

User avatar
Zidane
Stevie's Nick
Posts: 3579
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 6:36 pm
Name: Nick
Location: Dallas, GA

Re: 126600

Post by Zidane » Fri Feb 09, 2018 11:55 am

JP Chestnut wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 4:36 pm
Zidane wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 4:28 pm
JP Chestnut wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 9:21 am
Seppia wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 9:05 am
Panerai7 wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 8:18 am
JP Chestnut wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 8:13 am

This is on the Rolex radar - RSC NY is requiring an original purchase receipt for warranty work with a non-USA stamped warranty card. I'm sure Dallas and BH aren't far behind.
That's good.
Mhhhh.
partially unrelated, but I personally hate the "non transferable warranty" policy.
I find it completely BS, why shouldn't the warranty be valid if i bought second hand?
#fakenews

It is transferable. It just can't pass through a reseller before entering the hands of the first customer, which is 100% reasonable. The receipt doesn't have to be in your name. But good luck getting David SW to give you an original purchase receipt!
That's incorrect from what I understand. I looked at financing a well respected jeweler (100 years in business) last year; a Rolex and Patek dealer among others. The head of their watch division informed me that Rolex changed the policy about a year ago. The new protocol is for every AD to take a picture/scan of the original warranty card, fully filled out with the original buyers info and send it into Rolex. After that, if the warranty is called into action, the owner must be the original buyer listed on the warranty card for Rolex to cover it as it's cross-referenced.

Not sure if that's actually being done by "the book" so to speak, but that's the new protocol.
That may be the behind the scenes set up, but the Rolex warranty is a full warranty. Full warranties have specific legal obligations. One of which is being transferable. This is all defined by the MAGNUSON-MOSS WARRANTY ACT:
https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/busines ... nuson-Moss

I looked into this last year. Per the current wording of the Rolex warranty it's a full warranty and is consequently transferable. The only qualifying language is about it being sold first to an individual (not a reseller).

Rolex would be subject to a class action lawsuit if they could be shown to be doing what you say. I wish Jeff were still around - this is right up his alley.
Good point and I hope you're right...might just be a marketing ploy they tell the dealers. :think:

User avatar
Grahamcombat
Posts: 3902
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 5:24 pm
Name: Graham

Re: 126600

Post by Grahamcombat » Fri Feb 09, 2018 1:57 pm

I just bought a brand new BLNR, over the phone, from a dealer, and had the card filled out in someone else’s name and shipped to them.

So, you don’t really need to present an ID when buying.

User avatar
fastward
Fast Eddie
Posts: 11224
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 12:45 pm

Re: 126600

Post by fastward » Fri Feb 09, 2018 4:42 pm

The AD that my company works with has quoted a 2-3 year wait on the SS Daytona and wouldn’t commit to a timeline for the Sea Dweller. They told me that they cannot find them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 14949
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ann Arbor, MI USA

Re: 126600

Post by JP Chestnut » Fri Feb 09, 2018 4:46 pm

A three year wait seems pretty reasonable.

User avatar
fastward
Fast Eddie
Posts: 11224
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 12:45 pm

Re: 126600

Post by fastward » Fri Feb 09, 2018 5:03 pm

JP Chestnut wrote:A three year wait seems pretty reasonable.
It sure beats the Project 300 watch.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 14949
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ann Arbor, MI USA

Re: 126600

Post by JP Chestnut » Fri Feb 09, 2018 5:20 pm

fastward wrote:
Fri Feb 09, 2018 5:03 pm
JP Chestnut wrote:A three year wait seems pretty reasonable.
It sure beats the Project 300 watch.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Plus you get a real watch, not a stupid toy.

User avatar
fastward
Fast Eddie
Posts: 11224
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 12:45 pm

Re: 126600

Post by fastward » Fri Feb 09, 2018 5:31 pm

JP Chestnut wrote:
Fri Feb 09, 2018 5:20 pm
fastward wrote:
Fri Feb 09, 2018 5:03 pm
JP Chestnut wrote:A three year wait seems pretty reasonable.
It sure beats the Project 300 watch.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Plus you get a real watch, not a stupid toy.
I didn’t want a toy, but I also didn’t want to wait.

User avatar
Panerai7
Posts: 14151
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:09 pm
Name: Art
Location: North Carolina

Re: 126600

Post by Panerai7 » Fri Feb 09, 2018 5:40 pm

Already started seeing some trusted TRF dealers selling supposedly BNIB but without stickers and card named. Ha it's happening.

User avatar
dukerules
Posts: 13713
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: 126600

Post by dukerules » Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:00 am

It's hard to argue that this watch is a nice move for Rolex. Sized up but still wearable, and that red line is amazing. But for me, a Sea-Dweller should never have a cyclops. This is going to look fantastic if/when you fix that minor "issue."

User avatar
TSD
Posts: 1211
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 6:47 am
Name: Tom
Location: So Fla

Re: 126600

Post by TSD » Fri Feb 16, 2018 6:28 pm

dukerules wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:00 am
It's hard to argue that this watch is a nice move for Rolex. Sized up but still wearable, and that red line is amazing. But for me, a Sea-Dweller should never have a cyclops. This is going to look fantastic if/when you fix that minor "issue."
Finally have an update, and added to my initial post after exploring a LAWW replacement crystal. Appreciated Master Wu connecting me with his experts, and LAWW researching to come up with a solution. Unfortunately, the all-new dimensions for this crystal mean no options yet for an after market version. :crybaby:

User avatar
matt.wu
Wu
Posts: 27221
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:33 pm
Name: m@
Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA

Re: 126600

Post by matt.wu » Fri Feb 16, 2018 7:33 pm

:(
:htfu:

User avatar
Panerai7
Posts: 14151
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:09 pm
Name: Art
Location: North Carolina

Re: 126600

Post by Panerai7 » Sat Feb 17, 2018 6:16 am

I thought you already knew that when you bought it. I remember we discussed before how SDC43 and polar exporer2 42mm don't have crystal replacement available.

User avatar
TSD
Posts: 1211
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 6:47 am
Name: Tom
Location: So Fla

Re: 126600

Post by TSD » Sat Feb 17, 2018 6:31 am

Panerai7 wrote:
Sat Feb 17, 2018 6:16 am
I thought you already knew that when you bought it. I remember we discussed before how SDC43 and polar exporer2 42mm don't have crystal replacement available.
I was optimistic. If a custom crystal can be cut, they would probably be the ones to source it.

User avatar
TSD
Posts: 1211
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 6:47 am
Name: Tom
Location: So Fla

Re: 126600

Post by TSD » Sun Jul 08, 2018 1:07 pm

Just updating the thread to note the dial change to the 126600, after the first year of “anniversary” production. Rolex added a coronet between Swiss Made, same as the DSSD, etc.

Borrowed IG post
Image

User avatar
hoppyjr
HJ
Posts: 29958
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 9:05 am
Name: Hoppy
Location: Washington State

Re: 126600

Post by hoppyjr » Sun Jul 08, 2018 1:19 pm

TSD wrote:Just updating the thread to note the dial change to the 126600, after the first year of “anniversary” production. Rolex added a coronet between Swiss Made, same as the DSSD, etc.

Borrowed IG post
Image
....because they don’t have enough coronets on the watch. :lol:

User avatar
TSD
Posts: 1211
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 6:47 am
Name: Tom
Location: So Fla

Re: 126600

Post by TSD » Sun Jul 08, 2018 1:57 pm

hoppyjr wrote:
Sun Jul 08, 2018 1:19 pm
TSD wrote:Just updating the thread to note the dial change to the 126600, after the first year of “anniversary” production. Rolex added a coronet between Swiss Made, same as the DSSD, etc.
....because they don’t have enough coronets on the watch. :lol:
Most have 9 or 10. This new one goes to 11. :lol:

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests