1972 Rolex Single Red Submariner FS

Discussion of Rolex Watches.
Post Reply
User avatar
logan2z
IT Admin
Posts: 11743
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:08 am
Name: Andrew
Location: SF Bay Area, CA

1972 Rolex Single Red Submariner FS

Post by logan2z » Sat Oct 15, 2016 8:01 am

I saw this on a Porsche forum I frequent and thought someone here might be interested. I'm not a Rolex guy at all so I don't know how desirable this particular piece is or whether the asking price is realistic, but thought I'd pass it along just in case.

You have to be a member of the forum to read the ad so I've copied the content here.

No affiliation...
__________________________________

I don't wear this at all anymore and want to change out for something I will wear more often. Its a damn,really good example of a single red. Purchased through WatchUwant.com originally (which is owned by Govberg's so it was checked out mechanically before sale). Fat Font bezel, matching lume on hands and dial, lightly polished with full lugs, case reads 1680 and full serial number and legitimately keeps damn near perfect time. It has the original bracelet as well, with next to no stretch, original end links and even spring bars. It's a Mk. 3 dial. If you, or you know anyone that's interested, set them my way!

Photobucket seems to be not working the way I like and something up with the OTL photo upload, so apologies for inevitably having the pictures sideways. Ive got way more pictures, not sure why its being a pain, but PM me and Ill send you a ton.

Asking $13000. I'm not in a rush to sell it, and while its on a slightly higher side compared to a $10500 dollar head only with crushed pearl, thin font and re-lumed, mismatching hands, its a fantastic example.

Email if you need any more info at bb1162001@yahoo.com

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


User avatar
Marjak
Posts: 1789
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 4:56 am
Name: Mart

Re: 1972 Rolex Single Red Submariner FS

Post by Marjak » Sat Oct 15, 2016 8:51 am

Nice, and from my birth year! Wish I had the funds....
- Mart -

User avatar
Jeep99dad
Grand-père
Posts: 32338
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:07 am
Name: Brice
Location: FlipVille, SC

Re: 1972 Rolex Single Red Submariner FS

Post by Jeep99dad » Sat Oct 15, 2016 11:16 am

My birth year too but im broke :(
Merde Alors! Et Vive Les Francais! :)

User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 17821
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ithaca, NY USA

Re: 1972 Rolex Single Red Submariner FS

Post by JP Chestnut » Sat Oct 15, 2016 11:21 am

Case looks nice, but the insert's pearl appears far too white to be original. However 5013 prices are making these look REALLY reasonable.

User avatar
foodle
Posts: 4166
Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 7:35 pm

Re: 1972 Rolex Single Red Submariner FS

Post by foodle » Sat Oct 15, 2016 2:24 pm

JP Chestnut wrote:Case looks nice, but the insert's pearl appears far too white to be original. However 5013 prices are making these look REALLY reasonable.
Price is on the high side, but not too insane. Slightly higher than what Jacek is offering, and he's a dealer. Private sale should be less.

Case does look ok, but more pics of the lugs would be good. I agree that the bezel insert must be a replacement, since it shows little wear/fading and the pearl is way too white to be original tritium.

User avatar
BBK357
Ban Jacobs
Posts: 28849
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 2:01 pm
Name: Vladimir
Location: Ohio

Re: 1972 Rolex Single Red Submariner FS

Post by BBK357 » Sat Oct 15, 2016 2:54 pm

I've seen similar for 10k....

But that's my dream watch. Very nice


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
DEATH FROM ABOVE
:ak:

User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 17821
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ithaca, NY USA

Re: 1972 Rolex Single Red Submariner FS

Post by JP Chestnut » Sat Oct 15, 2016 3:44 pm

foodle wrote:
JP Chestnut wrote:Case looks nice, but the insert's pearl appears far too white to be original. However 5013 prices are making these look REALLY reasonable.
Price is on the high side, but not too insane. Slightly higher than what Jacek is offering, and he's a dealer. Private sale should be less.
I agree. However, watches that were "too expensive" early last year would be considered "well bought" now. A lot of people did well buying prime examples at the absolute top of the market and then holding them. That's not to say that this will continue, or even that this watch would be considered "prime" given a better set of macro shots.

I can't completely tell, but the plots look a bit odd in a few pictures. Definitely not as nice as some of the OG purchase vintage watches on TRF.

User avatar
Panerai7
Posts: 16728
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:09 pm
Name: Art
Location: North Carolina

Re: 1972 Rolex Single Red Submariner FS

Post by Panerai7 » Sat Oct 15, 2016 4:12 pm

Need to find 1974 LNIB , pm me for details lol

User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 17821
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ithaca, NY USA

Re: 1972 Rolex Single Red Submariner FS

Post by JP Chestnut » Sat Oct 15, 2016 4:13 pm

Panerai7 wrote:Need to find 1974 LNIB , pm me for details lol
Too bad you're old:
http://shop.analogshift.com/collections ... wflake-nos

User avatar
Panerai7
Posts: 16728
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:09 pm
Name: Art
Location: North Carolina

Re: 1972 Rolex Single Red Submariner FS

Post by Panerai7 » Sat Oct 15, 2016 4:26 pm

Yeah wish I was born in the 80's could score a mint 16800 for a song

User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 17821
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ithaca, NY USA

Re: 1972 Rolex Single Red Submariner FS

Post by JP Chestnut » Sat Oct 15, 2016 4:30 pm

Panerai7 wrote:Yeah wish I was born in the 80's could score a mint 16800 for a song
It's been a while since I saw a really great 16800 for anything less than :shock: money. I still kick myself for not buying a mint, complete, and unpolished 1981 Sub for $4000. Why didn't I buy it? It was two years off from my birth year (same identical watch, just not the right case stamp) :doh:

User avatar
Panerai7
Posts: 16728
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:09 pm
Name: Art
Location: North Carolina

Re: 1972 Rolex Single Red Submariner FS

Post by Panerai7 » Sat Oct 15, 2016 4:41 pm

JP Chestnut wrote:
Panerai7 wrote:Yeah wish I was born in the 80's could score a mint 16800 for a song
It's been a while since I saw a really great 16800 for anything less than :shock: money. I still kick myself for not buying a mint, complete, and unpolished 1981 Sub for $4000. Why didn't I buy it? It was two years off from my birth year (same identical watch, just not the right case stamp) :doh:
Well I guess it's birth year or nothing. Too bad in 1974 it was a year of a bunch of Red Subs and SD's

User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 17821
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ithaca, NY USA

Re: 1972 Rolex Single Red Submariner FS

Post by JP Chestnut » Sat Oct 15, 2016 4:47 pm

Panerai7 wrote:
JP Chestnut wrote:
Panerai7 wrote:Yeah wish I was born in the 80's could score a mint 16800 for a song
It's been a while since I saw a really great 16800 for anything less than :shock: money. I still kick myself for not buying a mint, complete, and unpolished 1981 Sub for $4000. Why didn't I buy it? It was two years off from my birth year (same identical watch, just not the right case stamp) :doh:
Well I guess it's birth year or nothing. Too bad in 1974 it was a year of a bunch of Red Subs and SD's
Look on the bright side. Now that those cool watches have all been snapped up, you can over pay for a shitty condition Datejust!

User avatar
Panerai7
Posts: 16728
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:09 pm
Name: Art
Location: North Carolina

Re: 1972 Rolex Single Red Submariner FS

Post by Panerai7 » Sat Oct 15, 2016 5:12 pm

JP Chestnut wrote:
Panerai7 wrote:
JP Chestnut wrote:
Panerai7 wrote:Yeah wish I was born in the 80's could score a mint 16800 for a song
It's been a while since I saw a really great 16800 for anything less than :shock: money. I still kick myself for not buying a mint, complete, and unpolished 1981 Sub for $4000. Why didn't I buy it? It was two years off from my birth year (same identical watch, just not the right case stamp) :doh:
Well I guess it's birth year or nothing. Too bad in 1974 it was a year of a bunch of Red Subs and SD's
Look on the bright side. Now that those cool watches have all been snapped up, you can over pay for a shitty condition Datejust!
Or a 75- dollar Heuer I can pay 5K. Yes!

User avatar
foodle
Posts: 4166
Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 7:35 pm

Re: 1972 Rolex Single Red Submariner FS

Post by foodle » Sat Oct 15, 2016 6:44 pm

JP Chestnut wrote: I agree. However, watches that were "too expensive" early last year would be considered "well bought" now. A lot of people did well buying prime examples at the absolute top of the market and then holding them. That's not to say that this will continue, or even that this watch would be considered "prime" given a better set of macro shots.
True, but I would worry the market is peaking or has already peaked. While vintage has been doing well recently, the overall luxury watch market is not doing well at all. I would think that it's only a matter of time before the downturn hits vintage as well.

Also, red 1680's aren't exactly that rare. While the prices of super rare pieces may keep moving up, I'd speculate that more common pieces like this will start to see prices drop.

Either way, I'm glad I scratched my itch for these a while ago. ;)

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests