Explorer 1 vs Milgauss

Discussion of Rolex Watches.
User avatar
kempoman
Posts: 2618
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 10:21 pm
Location: Borneo Island

Explorer 1 vs Milgauss

Post by kempoman » Sun Jan 17, 2016 10:51 pm

Gents, I am not a Rolex man and my recent searches in the secondary market an Explorer 1 is more expensive than a Milgauss (non GV model). I thought the other way round is true.
Pls enlighten.
Watch collector since 1989

JBZ
Mr. Tasseled Loafer
Posts: 11224
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:03 am
Name: Jeff

Re: Explorer 1 vs Milgauss

Post by JBZ » Mon Jan 18, 2016 5:07 am

To me it comes down to aesthetics. Personally, I prefer the Explorer, but I don't think you really sacrifice anything significant by going with one over the other. The anti-magnetic properties of the Milgauss are probably less relevant now given the blue parachrome hairspring Rolex uses. If you do work in a place with a lot of magnetic conditions, I guess it would still be better to go with the Milgauss.

I think the Milgauss still uses the 3131 movement, which doesn't incorporate the newer shock absorption system present in the 3132 (which is only used in the 39mm Exp - the 36mm still uses the 3130). That said, all three are very solid movements.

A lot of people don't like the shorter minute hand on the 39mm Exp. The Milgauss has a bit more "bling" with polished lugs and center links.
Image

User avatar
jimyritz
Masshole
Posts: 24448
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Name: Mike
Location: Boston

Re: Explorer 1 vs Milgauss

Post by jimyritz » Mon Jan 18, 2016 6:21 am

I just think more people prefer the Exp...

User avatar
apnk
Supergluing Miscreant
Posts: 1640
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 3:37 pm
Name: Juan
Location: Idaho

Re: Explorer 1 vs Milgauss

Post by apnk » Mon Jan 18, 2016 6:29 am

Based on the looks I like the Explorer better.

User avatar
demer03
Current Forecast: Vintage Doxa
Posts: 19621
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:41 pm
Name: Mike
Location: Lake Michigami

Re: Explorer 1 vs Milgauss

Post by demer03 » Mon Jan 18, 2016 6:34 am

Old stuff? Explorer

New stuff? Milgauss (Darin's is hot....)
Old Michigan steams like a young man's dreams
The islands and bays are for sportsmen

Image

User avatar
moishlashen
Posts: 16208
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 5:28 am
Name: Leu Sanis
Location: Somewheres paddlin' it.

Re: Explorer 1 vs Milgauss

Post by moishlashen » Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:28 am

I had a Mille-Loved it for about a week then for whatever reason I couldn't flip it fast enough.
Image

"I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quiet of servitude."

User avatar
Torrid
Posts: 6671
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:43 am
Name: Heath
Location: Wisconsin

Re: Explorer 1 vs Milgauss

Post by Torrid » Mon Jan 18, 2016 8:38 am

If I was in the market I'd happily go for either one, they are much more my style these days over divers. It started with my field watch kick a year or so ago. They both have great details and while the Explorer is so perfectly balanced and traditional style wise, I think the Milgauss has more unique features. The green hue from the edge of the crystal is awesome. Honestly the only thing I don't like about the Milgauss is the seconds hand. I get the reasoning for it, but sometimes it seems funky to me.

User avatar
ericf4
(TBD) Penis
Posts: 15623
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 6:04 am
Contact:

Re: Explorer 1 vs Milgauss

Post by ericf4 » Mon Jan 18, 2016 8:54 am

I've just never liked the milgauss and that weird second hand. I'd take an EXP all day long over it. My two cents.
Visit my Music/Drumming Channel at:

https://youtube.com/ericfeuer

User avatar
4pfrench
Posts: 4949
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 8:28 am
Name: Paul
Location: DFW

Re: Explorer 1 vs Milgauss

Post by 4pfrench » Mon Jan 18, 2016 8:55 am

And I'm just the opposite...have the GV and and love everything about it. I couldn't imagine getting rid of it...
_____________________
paul

giosdad
Posts: 5095
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 6:33 pm
Location: New York

Re: Explorer 1 vs Milgauss

Post by giosdad » Mon Jan 18, 2016 9:18 am

I had the non-GV Milgauss and really enjoyed it. It was versatile and got me a ton of compliments. I ultimately was driven crazy by the polished center links and clasp and for a while wore it on straps and nato before I sold it. If I ever own another which is possible I would have the bracelet brushed. It was a nice under the radar Rolex. Having said that I would love to own an Explorer one day as well. You can't go wrong with either. Deals are out there for both models if you take the time and decide which is for you.
Regards
Barry

User avatar
blowfish89
Posts: 2022
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 7:25 pm

Re: Explorer 1 vs Milgauss

Post by blowfish89 » Mon Jan 18, 2016 9:43 am

I love love love the Milgauss, certainly much more than the Explorer - my pick is the black dial GV version. The Milgauss is a little flashy, the blue dial makes it even more so, but I really like the green crystal (without the GV crystal, the regular black dial Milgauss loses its appeal for me). I am not surprised that the non-GV Milgauss and the Explorer I are around the same price - the white Milgauss must be the cheapest.
I picked a vintage Sub and I would happily pick a MilgaussGV instead of it on another day - maybe in the future.

User avatar
Denizen
Posts: 1138
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 6:47 pm

Re: Explorer 1 vs Milgauss

Post by Denizen » Mon Jan 18, 2016 11:44 am

i have the milgauss, would have bought the 39mm Exp when they were first announced but yes, the short minute hand (same length as the one on the 36mm version) is a deal-breaker for me.

i love the milgauss, the seconds hand doesn't bother me one bit. would prefer the center-links brushed, but i don't think the milgauss is anywhere near blingy. great watch that i bought new and have never looked back.

User avatar
Sidheguitarist
Man of many calibers.
Posts: 10404
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:16 pm
Name: Michael

Re: Explorer 1 vs Milgauss

Post by Sidheguitarist » Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:02 pm

The Milgauss strikes me as a very cool watch for adding variety to a reasonably big stable of rotating wearers.

The explorer I is a damn good candidate for a single, daily wear watch.

That's the difference.

User avatar
toxicavenger
President Tranny
Posts: 48109
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:25 am
Name: HeadDIK
Location: Colorado Springs

Re: Explorer 1 vs Milgauss

Post by toxicavenger » Mon Jan 18, 2016 2:34 pm

I borrowed a 39mm E1 a while back and I couldn't take it off

JBZ
Mr. Tasseled Loafer
Posts: 11224
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:03 am
Name: Jeff

Re: Explorer 1 vs Milgauss

Post by JBZ » Mon Jan 18, 2016 2:45 pm

Sidheguitarist wrote:The Milgauss strikes me as a very cool watch for adding variety to a reasonably big stable of rotating wearers.

The explorer I is a damn good candidate for a single, daily wear watch.

That's the difference.
Pretty much what I'm doing.
Image

User avatar
kempoman
Posts: 2618
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 10:21 pm
Location: Borneo Island

Re: Explorer 1 vs Milgauss

Post by kempoman » Mon Jan 18, 2016 3:18 pm

JBZ wrote:To me it comes down to aesthetics. Personally, I prefer the Explorer, but I don't think you really sacrifice anything significant by going with one over the other. The anti-magnetic properties of the Milgauss are probably less relevant now given the blue parachrome hairspring Rolex uses. If you do work in a place with a lot of magnetic conditions, I guess it would still be better to go with the Milgauss.

I think the Milgauss still uses the 3131 movement, which doesn't incorporate the newer shock absorption system present in the 3132 (which is only used in the 39mm Exp - the 36mm still uses the 3130). That said, all three are very solid movements.

A lot of people don't like the shorter minute hand on the 39mm Exp. The Milgauss has a bit more "bling" with polished lugs and center links.
Ok thanks to show the differences in movement.
Watch collector since 1989

JBZ
Mr. Tasseled Loafer
Posts: 11224
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:03 am
Name: Jeff

Re: Explorer 1 vs Milgauss

Post by JBZ » Mon Jan 18, 2016 3:26 pm

kempoman wrote:
JBZ wrote:To me it comes down to aesthetics. Personally, I prefer the Explorer, but I don't think you really sacrifice anything significant by going with one over the other. The anti-magnetic properties of the Milgauss are probably less relevant now given the blue parachrome hairspring Rolex uses. If you do work in a place with a lot of magnetic conditions, I guess it would still be better to go with the Milgauss.

I think the Milgauss still uses the 3131 movement, which doesn't incorporate the newer shock absorption system present in the 3132 (which is only used in the 39mm Exp - the 36mm still uses the 3130). That said, all three are very solid movements.

A lot of people don't like the shorter minute hand on the 39mm Exp. The Milgauss has a bit more "bling" with polished lugs and center links.
Ok thanks to show the differences in movement.
What's the cost of a pre-owned non-GV Milgauss? I am a little surprised the cost is significantly lower than a 39mm Exp.
Image

User avatar
Sidheguitarist
Man of many calibers.
Posts: 10404
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:16 pm
Name: Michael

Re: Explorer 1 vs Milgauss

Post by Sidheguitarist » Mon Jan 18, 2016 3:40 pm

JBZ wrote:
Sidheguitarist wrote:The Milgauss strikes me as a very cool watch for adding variety to a reasonably big stable of rotating wearers.

The explorer I is a damn good candidate for a single, daily wear watch.

That's the difference.
Pretty much what I'm doing.
You've got great taste, Jeff.

I assume yours is the 39mm?

JBZ
Mr. Tasseled Loafer
Posts: 11224
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:03 am
Name: Jeff

Re: Explorer 1 vs Milgauss

Post by JBZ » Mon Jan 18, 2016 3:50 pm

Sidheguitarist wrote:
JBZ wrote:
Sidheguitarist wrote:The Milgauss strikes me as a very cool watch for adding variety to a reasonably big stable of rotating wearers.

The explorer I is a damn good candidate for a single, daily wear watch.

That's the difference.
Pretty much what I'm doing.
You've got great taste, Jeff.

I assume yours is the 39mm?
Yup. The 36 is just a bit too small for me. Still a great looking piece though.
Image

User avatar
rockmastermike
Feedback Virtuoso
Posts: 20576
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 5:13 pm
Name: WDE

Re: Explorer 1 vs Milgauss

Post by rockmastermike » Mon Jan 18, 2016 4:00 pm

damn, now I want another EXP.
Oh well.

User avatar
smalls
Posts: 5253
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:02 am
Name: Matt
Location: South Carolina

Re: Explorer 1 vs Milgauss

Post by smalls » Mon Jan 18, 2016 4:22 pm

Wish the Milgauss were brushed as I prefer the overall dimensions of it to the Explorer. But the 39mm Explorer is a fantastic piece and one I hope to purchase again in 2016.

Image

Image
Last edited by smalls on Tue Jan 19, 2016 9:17 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
kempoman
Posts: 2618
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 10:21 pm
Location: Borneo Island

Re: Explorer 1 vs Milgauss

Post by kempoman » Mon Jan 18, 2016 5:55 pm

JBZ wrote:
kempoman wrote:
JBZ wrote:To me it comes down to aesthetics. Personally, I prefer the Explorer, but I don't think you really sacrifice anything significant by going with one over the other. The anti-magnetic properties of the Milgauss are probably less relevant now given the blue parachrome hairspring Rolex uses. If you do work in a place with a lot of magnetic conditions, I guess it would still be better to go with the Milgauss.

I think the Milgauss still uses the 3131 movement, which doesn't incorporate the newer shock absorption system present in the 3132 (which is only used in the 39mm Exp - the 36mm still uses the 3130). That said, all three are very solid movements.

A lot of people don't like the shorter minute hand on the 39mm Exp. The Milgauss has a bit more "bling" with polished lugs and center links.
Ok thanks to show the differences in movement.
What's the cost of a pre-owned non-GV Milgauss? I am a little surprised the cost is significantly lower than a 39mm Exp.
A search in watch recon will show the pricing.
Watch collector since 1989

JBZ
Mr. Tasseled Loafer
Posts: 11224
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:03 am
Name: Jeff

Re: Explorer 1 vs Milgauss

Post by JBZ » Mon Jan 18, 2016 6:52 pm

kempoman wrote:
JBZ wrote:
kempoman wrote:
JBZ wrote:To me it comes down to aesthetics. Personally, I prefer the Explorer, but I don't think you really sacrifice anything significant by going with one over the other. The anti-magnetic properties of the Milgauss are probably less relevant now given the blue parachrome hairspring Rolex uses. If you do work in a place with a lot of magnetic conditions, I guess it would still be better to go with the Milgauss.

I think the Milgauss still uses the 3131 movement, which doesn't incorporate the newer shock absorption system present in the 3132 (which is only used in the 39mm Exp - the 36mm still uses the 3130). That said, all three are very solid movements.

A lot of people don't like the shorter minute hand on the 39mm Exp. The Milgauss has a bit more "bling" with polished lugs and center links.
Ok thanks to show the differences in movement.
What's the cost of a pre-owned non-GV Milgauss? I am a little surprised the cost is significantly lower than a 39mm Exp.
A search in watch recon will show the pricing.
I'm sure it will. I thought we were having a conversation.
Image

User avatar
Terpits
Creepy Tudor Guy
Posts: 6174
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2014 9:06 am
Name: Peter
Location: Hill Country TX

Re: Explorer 1 vs Milgauss

Post by Terpits » Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:02 pm

114270 for me. The short hand on the 214270 bothers.
If I'd get a short handed watch, I'll go with the SM300.

114270 or 116000 blue dial.
:rimshot:

User avatar
kfalk
Old Chub
Posts: 11481
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 7:50 am
Name: Kelly

Re: Explorer 1 vs Milgauss

Post by kfalk » Tue Jan 19, 2016 7:47 am

JBZ wrote:
kempoman wrote:
JBZ wrote:
kempoman wrote:
JBZ wrote:To me it comes down to aesthetics. Personally, I prefer the Explorer, but I don't think you really sacrifice anything significant by going with one over the other. The anti-magnetic properties of the Milgauss are probably less relevant now given the blue parachrome hairspring Rolex uses. If you do work in a place with a lot of magnetic conditions, I guess it would still be better to go with the Milgauss.

I think the Milgauss still uses the 3131 movement, which doesn't incorporate the newer shock absorption system present in the 3132 (which is only used in the 39mm Exp - the 36mm still uses the 3130). That said, all three are very solid movements.

A lot of people don't like the shorter minute hand on the 39mm Exp. The Milgauss has a bit more "bling" with polished lugs and center links.
Ok thanks to show the differences in movement.
What's the cost of a pre-owned non-GV Milgauss? I am a little surprised the cost is significantly lower than a 39mm Exp.
A search in watch recon will show the pricing.

I'm sure it will. I thought we were having a conversation.
Crickets. I thought that was an odd reply as well?
Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 89 guests