Re: All of Tudor's New Baselworld 2018 Releases
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2018 8:03 am
Yeah the wait will be torture. For me it’s the GMT. Was told first week of Junejimyritz wrote:Just ordered my 58...got to make it til July...
HTFU!
https://www.thedivewatchconnection.com/forum/
https://www.thedivewatchconnection.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=62646
Yeah the wait will be torture. For me it’s the GMT. Was told first week of Junejimyritz wrote:Just ordered my 58...got to make it til July...
I have gotten a 15% discount on Tudors from an AD, but right now the ADs I've bought from aren't offering any discount on the 58. I'm on the fence about just jumping in at full retail or waiting for the initial rush to die down and buying one at a discount.
Yeap.BBK357 wrote:I’ve never bought a Tudor from an AD.. do they give a discount like Omega ?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
“For a few thousand more...”JP Chestnut wrote:I want one. I'm also cheap. You can always wait the two weeks for everyone on here to flip theirs.
It's so hard for me to justify watches in the $3500 range. For a few thousand more, I could add another five-digit Rolex Newer watches are definitely more wearable though. My EZ link Daytona is really comfortable and convenient.
I wish! I've been hunting the perfect collection of pre-ceramic Rolex for years... while watching their prices skyrocket. All I need is aJeep99dad wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 8:04 am“For a few thousand more...”JP Chestnut wrote:I want one. I'm also cheap. You can always wait the two weeks for everyone on here to flip theirs.
It's so hard for me to justify watches in the $3500 range. For a few thousand more, I could add another five-digit Rolex Newer watches are definitely more wearable though. My EZ link Daytona is really comfortable and convenient.
So twice as much baller
Thos are all iconic watchesJP Chestnut wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 8:12 amI wish! I've been hunting the perfect collection of pre-ceramic Rolex for years... while watching their prices skyrocket. All I need is aJeep99dad wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 8:04 am“For a few thousand more...”JP Chestnut wrote:I want one. I'm also cheap. You can always wait the two weeks for everyone on here to flip theirs.
It's so hard for me to justify watches in the $3500 range. For a few thousand more, I could add another five-digit Rolex Newer watches are definitely more wearable though. My EZ link Daytona is really comfortable and convenient.
So twice as much baller
17000 Oysterquartz
14060M
16570 Explorer 2
114720 Explorer
and then I'll finally be done. Any watch I buy that's not on the list just puts me a little farther away. Even so, if the 58 follows the regular BB's depreciation it's going to get bought eventually.
Unfortunately, or fortunately, I guess, my wife counts my watch accumulation in terms of pure numbers, not price. One Daytona seems less objectionable to her than three cheaper watches.
It's true. I'd seriously consider flipping my somewhat too large PO2500 for one. It should be a pretty similar value. I just hate getting rid of stuff I like.Panerai7 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 9:10 amThos are all iconic watchesJP Chestnut wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 8:12 amI wish! I've been hunting the perfect collection of pre-ceramic Rolex for years... while watching their prices skyrocket. All I need is aJeep99dad wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 8:04 am“For a few thousand more...”JP Chestnut wrote:I want one. I'm also cheap. You can always wait the two weeks for everyone on here to flip theirs.
It's so hard for me to justify watches in the $3500 range. For a few thousand more, I could add another five-digit Rolex Newer watches are definitely more wearable though. My EZ link Daytona is really comfortable and convenient.
So twice as much baller
17000 Oysterquartz
14060M
16570 Explorer 2
114720 Explorer
and then I'll finally be done. Any watch I buy that's not on the list just puts me a little farther away. Even so, if the 58 follows the regular BB's depreciation it's going to get bought eventually.
Unfortunately, or fortunately, I guess, my wife counts my watch accumulation in terms of pure numbers, not price. One Daytona seems less objectionable to her than three cheaper watches.
Of course Tudor 58 at under 3K from AD is a no-brainer and "inexpensive" enough to wear everwhere
Every version you might want is likely to come - another reason I'm averse to getting one quick. I want a blue dial/bezel version.
A classic that's always a little too big. After getting my Daytona, it's hard to wear either my Speedy Pro or the PO. They're both a little large. Strangely the PO is actually pretty comfortable due to the heavy bracelet and large clasp. It stays anchored nicely on my wrist.
2500 is a great watch. But Tudor/Rolex 70-hr in-house mov't for that kinda money is a deal of the century.JP Chestnut wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 9:19 amIt's true. I'd seriously consider flipping my somewhat too large PO2500 for one. It should be a pretty similar value. I just hate getting rid of stuff I like.Panerai7 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 9:10 amThos are all iconic watchesJP Chestnut wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 8:12 amI wish! I've been hunting the perfect collection of pre-ceramic Rolex for years... while watching their prices skyrocket. All I need is aJeep99dad wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 8:04 am“For a few thousand more...”JP Chestnut wrote:I want one. I'm also cheap. You can always wait the two weeks for everyone on here to flip theirs.
It's so hard for me to justify watches in the $3500 range. For a few thousand more, I could add another five-digit Rolex Newer watches are definitely more wearable though. My EZ link Daytona is really comfortable and convenient.
So twice as much baller
17000 Oysterquartz
14060M
16570 Explorer 2
114720 Explorer
and then I'll finally be done. Any watch I buy that's not on the list just puts me a little farther away. Even so, if the 58 follows the regular BB's depreciation it's going to get bought eventually.
Unfortunately, or fortunately, I guess, my wife counts my watch accumulation in terms of pure numbers, not price. One Daytona seems less objectionable to her than three cheaper watches.
Of course Tudor 58 at under 3K from AD is a no-brainer and "inexpensive" enough to wear everwhere
I never thought I'd buy a Tudor/Rolex anything, but I have to admit that the BB58 has turned my head a little and I've given some thought to flipping my PO2500 to fund one. But I agree that the PO2500 is (or is soon to be) a classic and I may regret that. Especially since I don't think that current used prices really reflect the future value of the PO.Panerai7 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 10:07 am2500 is a great watch. But Tudor/Rolex 70-hr in-house mov't for that kinda money is a deal of the century.JP Chestnut wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 9:19 amIt's true. I'd seriously consider flipping my somewhat too large PO2500 for one. It should be a pretty similar value. I just hate getting rid of stuff I like.Panerai7 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 9:10 amThos are all iconic watchesJP Chestnut wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 8:12 amI wish! I've been hunting the perfect collection of pre-ceramic Rolex for years... while watching their prices skyrocket. All I need is aJeep99dad wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 8:04 am“For a few thousand more...”JP Chestnut wrote:I want one. I'm also cheap. You can always wait the two weeks for everyone on here to flip theirs.
It's so hard for me to justify watches in the $3500 range. For a few thousand more, I could add another five-digit Rolex Newer watches are definitely more wearable though. My EZ link Daytona is really comfortable and convenient.
So twice as much baller
17000 Oysterquartz
14060M
16570 Explorer 2
114720 Explorer
and then I'll finally be done. Any watch I buy that's not on the list just puts me a little farther away. Even so, if the 58 follows the regular BB's depreciation it's going to get bought eventually.
Unfortunately, or fortunately, I guess, my wife counts my watch accumulation in terms of pure numbers, not price. One Daytona seems less objectionable to her than three cheaper watches.
Of course Tudor 58 at under 3K from AD is a no-brainer and "inexpensive" enough to wear everwhere
It seems like the PO2500 is the last Omega diver that I would ever think about owning. Every year their stuff gets worse. It would be a radical turnaround for them to introduce something that I would want.logan2z wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 10:30 amI never thought I'd buy a Tudor/Rolex anything, but I have to admit that the BB58 has turned my head a little and I've given some thought to flipping my PO2500 to fund one. But I agree that the PO2500 is (or is soon to be) a classic and I may regret that. Especially since I don't think that current used prices really reflect the future value of the PO.Panerai7 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 10:07 am2500 is a great watch. But Tudor/Rolex 70-hr in-house mov't for that kinda money is a deal of the century.JP Chestnut wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 9:19 amIt's true. I'd seriously consider flipping my somewhat too large PO2500 for one. It should be a pretty similar value. I just hate getting rid of stuff I like.Panerai7 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 9:10 amThos are all iconic watchesJP Chestnut wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 8:12 amI wish! I've been hunting the perfect collection of pre-ceramic Rolex for years... while watching their prices skyrocket. All I need is aJeep99dad wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 8:04 am“For a few thousand more...”JP Chestnut wrote:I want one. I'm also cheap. You can always wait the two weeks for everyone on here to flip theirs.
It's so hard for me to justify watches in the $3500 range. For a few thousand more, I could add another five-digit Rolex Newer watches are definitely more wearable though. My EZ link Daytona is really comfortable and convenient.
So twice as much baller
17000 Oysterquartz
14060M
16570 Explorer 2
114720 Explorer
and then I'll finally be done. Any watch I buy that's not on the list just puts me a little farther away. Even so, if the 58 follows the regular BB's depreciation it's going to get bought eventually.
Unfortunately, or fortunately, I guess, my wife counts my watch accumulation in terms of pure numbers, not price. One Daytona seems less objectionable to her than three cheaper watches.
Of course Tudor 58 at under 3K from AD is a no-brainer and "inexpensive" enough to wear everwhere
Guys, I'm not suggesting you give up your 2500 I wouldn't mind getting 45mm myself in 2500-D flavor. I'm just saying Tudor 58 is phenomenal for its price.JP Chestnut wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 10:33 amIt seems like the PO2500 is the last Omega diver that I would ever think about owning. Every year their stuff gets worse. It would be a radical turnaround for them to introduce something that I would want.logan2z wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 10:30 amI never thought I'd buy a Tudor/Rolex anything, but I have to admit that the BB58 has turned my head a little and I've given some thought to flipping my PO2500 to fund one. But I agree that the PO2500 is (or is soon to be) a classic and I may regret that. Especially since I don't think that current used prices really reflect the future value of the PO.Panerai7 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 10:07 am2500 is a great watch. But Tudor/Rolex 70-hr in-house mov't for that kinda money is a deal of the century.JP Chestnut wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 9:19 amIt's true. I'd seriously consider flipping my somewhat too large PO2500 for one. It should be a pretty similar value. I just hate getting rid of stuff I like.Panerai7 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 9:10 amThos are all iconic watchesJP Chestnut wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 8:12 amI wish! I've been hunting the perfect collection of pre-ceramic Rolex for years... while watching their prices skyrocket. All I need is aJeep99dad wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 8:04 am“For a few thousand more...”JP Chestnut wrote:I want one. I'm also cheap. You can always wait the two weeks for everyone on here to flip theirs.
It's so hard for me to justify watches in the $3500 range. For a few thousand more, I could add another five-digit Rolex Newer watches are definitely more wearable though. My EZ link Daytona is really comfortable and convenient.
So twice as much baller
17000 Oysterquartz
14060M
16570 Explorer 2
114720 Explorer
and then I'll finally be done. Any watch I buy that's not on the list just puts me a little farther away. Even so, if the 58 follows the regular BB's depreciation it's going to get bought eventually.
Unfortunately, or fortunately, I guess, my wife counts my watch accumulation in terms of pure numbers, not price. One Daytona seems less objectionable to her than three cheaper watches.
Of course Tudor 58 at under 3K from AD is a no-brainer and "inexpensive" enough to wear everwhere
I wasn't considering it because you suggested it Just saying that I was also considering flipping my 2500 as Jacob was. But I'll probably hang onto it (it is a 45mm D) and add the BB58 at some point.Panerai7 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 10:54 amGuys, I'm not suggesting you give up your 2500 I wouldn't mind getting 45mm myself in 2500-D flavor. I'm just saying Tudor 58 is phenomenal for its price.JP Chestnut wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 10:33 amIt seems like the PO2500 is the last Omega diver that I would ever think about owning. Every year their stuff gets worse. It would be a radical turnaround for them to introduce something that I would want.logan2z wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 10:30 amI never thought I'd buy a Tudor/Rolex anything, but I have to admit that the BB58 has turned my head a little and I've given some thought to flipping my PO2500 to fund one. But I agree that the PO2500 is (or is soon to be) a classic and I may regret that. Especially since I don't think that current used prices really reflect the future value of the PO.Panerai7 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 10:07 am2500 is a great watch. But Tudor/Rolex 70-hr in-house mov't for that kinda money is a deal of the century.JP Chestnut wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 9:19 amIt's true. I'd seriously consider flipping my somewhat too large PO2500 for one. It should be a pretty similar value. I just hate getting rid of stuff I like.Panerai7 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 9:10 amThos are all iconic watchesJP Chestnut wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 8:12 amI wish! I've been hunting the perfect collection of pre-ceramic Rolex for years... while watching their prices skyrocket. All I need is aJeep99dad wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 8:04 am“For a few thousand more...”JP Chestnut wrote:I want one. I'm also cheap. You can always wait the two weeks for everyone on here to flip theirs.
It's so hard for me to justify watches in the $3500 range. For a few thousand more, I could add another five-digit Rolex Newer watches are definitely more wearable though. My EZ link Daytona is really comfortable and convenient.
So twice as much baller
17000 Oysterquartz
14060M
16570 Explorer 2
114720 Explorer
and then I'll finally be done. Any watch I buy that's not on the list just puts me a little farther away. Even so, if the 58 follows the regular BB's depreciation it's going to get bought eventually.
Unfortunately, or fortunately, I guess, my wife counts my watch accumulation in terms of pure numbers, not price. One Daytona seems less objectionable to her than three cheaper watches.
Of course Tudor 58 at under 3K from AD is a no-brainer and "inexpensive" enough to wear everwhere
I'll be okay. I gotta get ready for Pepsi and don't want to put any more money into this silly hobby. Even though no one knows when it's going to be my turn. My AD told me flat out first 3-5 will go to their "high-rollers" who spent 100K++ with them in Jewelry.JP Chestnut wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 10:56 amI was pretty surprised when you gave up the Ti PAM. That watch just screamed "Art".
Now, that sounds like a solid plan budlogan2z wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 10:59 amI wasn't considering it because you suggested it Just saying that I was also considering flipping my 2500 as Jacob was. But I'll probably hang onto it (it is a 45mm D) and add the BB58 at some point.Panerai7 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 10:54 amGuys, I'm not suggesting you give up your 2500 I wouldn't mind getting 45mm myself in 2500-D flavor. I'm just saying Tudor 58 is phenomenal for its price.JP Chestnut wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 10:33 amIt seems like the PO2500 is the last Omega diver that I would ever think about owning. Every year their stuff gets worse. It would be a radical turnaround for them to introduce something that I would want.logan2z wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 10:30 amI never thought I'd buy a Tudor/Rolex anything, but I have to admit that the BB58 has turned my head a little and I've given some thought to flipping my PO2500 to fund one. But I agree that the PO2500 is (or is soon to be) a classic and I may regret that. Especially since I don't think that current used prices really reflect the future value of the PO.Panerai7 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 10:07 am2500 is a great watch. But Tudor/Rolex 70-hr in-house mov't for that kinda money is a deal of the century.JP Chestnut wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 9:19 amIt's true. I'd seriously consider flipping my somewhat too large PO2500 for one. It should be a pretty similar value. I just hate getting rid of stuff I like.Panerai7 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 9:10 amThos are all iconic watchesJP Chestnut wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 8:12 amI wish! I've been hunting the perfect collection of pre-ceramic Rolex for years... while watching their prices skyrocket. All I need is aJeep99dad wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 8:04 am“For a few thousand more...”JP Chestnut wrote:I want one. I'm also cheap. You can always wait the two weeks for everyone on here to flip theirs.
It's so hard for me to justify watches in the $3500 range. For a few thousand more, I could add another five-digit Rolex Newer watches are definitely more wearable though. My EZ link Daytona is really comfortable and convenient.
So twice as much baller
17000 Oysterquartz
14060M
16570 Explorer 2
114720 Explorer
and then I'll finally be done. Any watch I buy that's not on the list just puts me a little farther away. Even so, if the 58 follows the regular BB's depreciation it's going to get bought eventually.
Unfortunately, or fortunately, I guess, my wife counts my watch accumulation in terms of pure numbers, not price. One Daytona seems less objectionable to her than three cheaper watches.
Of course Tudor 58 at under 3K from AD is a no-brainer and "inexpensive" enough to wear everwhere