Rolex Sub 14060M vs IWC 3548-05

Watch review archives can be found here.
Post Reply
User avatar
CoachH
Posts: 1247
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:39 pm
Name: Joe
Location: Texas

Rolex Sub 14060M vs IWC 3548-05

Post by CoachH » Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:12 pm

I am offering this post as a comparison with pictures. There are most assuredly better photos of these watches available elsewhere.

Image

I have owned the Submariner for three years. By series letter it is a 2005 model with one service performed in 2011. I wear this watch at least twice as much as any of the other of my current collection of nine watches. It serves as my go to watch for any occasion.

I have had the Aquatimer for three days. Originally purchased in 2012, it has no service history. I feel confident that it can be worn for any occasion as well.

Image
Image

The dual crown of the Aquatimer is quite attractive to me. Sort of a modern compressor type look.
The lug holes of the no date are equally appealing to me.

Image

I am drawn to somewhat dressy divers and both of these fill that aesthetic nicely.

Image

The Aquatimer is industrial cool. But refined enough to look great with anything. The Sub is classic understatement that in my mind's eye is what a watch should look like.

Image
Image

Both are comfortable to wear for my 7.5 inch wrist. The IWC has the best link adjustment that I have ever encountered. The bracelet is a work of art and fits the style of the watch perfectly.

The Sub's bracelet is adequate at best. Not to anger any purist, but I replaced the OEM clasp with an aftermarket glide lock style clasp, and like the bracelet much better.
Image
Image

Neither will ever see more than the occasional swim in the lake, but I am more than confident that each could handle anything that I would put them through.

I have never timed either watch, but both seem very accurate. The Aquatimer has a date feature, which might be preferred by some. Unless the date feature detracts from the overall look of the dial, I have no problem with or without this feature.

Lume is about equal initially, but the Rolex lasts longer. Neither is particularly a torch.
Image

Both are at the upper limits of my spending comfort level. For the ballers here these are entry level divers. To each his own, but I am proud to own both.
Image

User avatar
CoachH
Posts: 1247
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:39 pm
Name: Joe
Location: Texas

Re: Rolex Sub 14060M vs IWC 3548-05

Post by CoachH » Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:11 pm

Testing to see if this is posting. My first lengthy iphone post. :shrug:

User avatar
jeckyll
Honorary Assistant Jr. Hall Monitor in Training
Posts: 11924
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:11 pm
Name: Björn

Re: Rolex Sub 14060M vs IWC 3548-05

Post by jeckyll » Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:21 pm

cool. I prefer the IWC :)
We all have the same enemy. The enemy is the tyranny of the dull mind. - - Tom Robbins

User avatar
Joeprez
Wants to see pics of your wife
Posts: 13851
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 5:36 am
Name: Joe
Location: Puerto Rico

Re: Rolex Sub 14060M vs IWC 3548-05

Post by Joeprez » Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:33 pm

Both are very nice!
Image

Omega / Tudor / Rolex / Sinn / Doxa / Seiko

User avatar
Sidheguitarist
Man of many calibers.
Posts: 10406
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:16 pm
Name: Michael

Re: Rolex Sub 14060M vs IWC 3548-05

Post by Sidheguitarist » Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:43 pm

Man, I am–and have been–so into the idea of subs for so long that it's hard not to side with the proven classic.

That said and true: that IWC, with the internal bezel, is just bonus. I might actually have to go IWC on this as well, if I can bring myself to ignore historical precedence.

User avatar
Torrid
Posts: 6671
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:43 am
Name: Heath
Location: Wisconsin

Re: Rolex Sub 14060M vs IWC 3548-05

Post by Torrid » Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:44 pm

I think I prefer the Rolex. Diversity, it's an old wooden ship.

User avatar
ericf4
(TBD) Penis
Posts: 15626
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 6:04 am
Contact:

Re: Rolex Sub 14060M vs IWC 3548-05

Post by ericf4 » Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:37 pm

Love them especially the iwc!!

Sent from my Nokia Lumia Icon
Visit my Music/Drumming Channel at:

https://youtube.com/ericfeuer

User avatar
matt.wu
Wu
Posts: 29837
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:33 pm
Name: m@
Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA

Re: Rolex Sub 14060M vs IWC 3548-05

Post by matt.wu » Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:57 pm

Very nice, Joe. I do enjoy hearing everyone's impressions. Between those two, I do believe the IWC brings more to the table in line with my taste, but they're a great pair.
:htfu:

User avatar
lilhoody
Black Darin
Posts: 9018
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:46 pm
Name: BD
Location: Phoenix

Re: Rolex Sub 14060M vs IWC 3548-05

Post by lilhoody » Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:54 am

Nice write up, thanks.
"Men are ruled by toys"
Napoleon Bonaparte

User avatar
rain_maker
Posts: 2493
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 9:55 pm
Name: Fred
Location: NW of Boston

Re: Rolex Sub 14060M vs IWC 3548-05

Post by rain_maker » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:02 am

Great write up and comparison pics.

Two classics - Possibly my favorite offering from ea company.

User avatar
jimyritz
Masshole
Posts: 24448
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Name: Mike
Location: Boston

Re: Rolex Sub 14060M vs IWC 3548-05

Post by jimyritz » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:08 am

Nice write up....I like them both :thumbsup:

User avatar
smalls
Posts: 5253
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:02 am
Name: Matt
Location: South Carolina

Re: Rolex Sub 14060M vs IWC 3548-05

Post by smalls » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:42 am

Love both of those and they both cover a lot of ground. The Sub holds a special place in my heart so I would lean towards that one in a matchup but the IWC ain't no slouch either.

User avatar
CoachH
Posts: 1247
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:39 pm
Name: Joe
Location: Texas

Re: Rolex Sub 14060M vs IWC 3548-05

Post by CoachH » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:45 am

rain_maker wrote:Great write up and comparison pics.

Two classics - Possibly my favorite offering from ea company.
I agree about the favorites from each company. As far as classics - it usually takes me so long to make up my mind and convince myself to buy that the watches I want are "classic" by that point.

User avatar
marchone
Capt. Obvious
Posts: 14806
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:30 am
Name: Wayne
Location: NYC

Re: Rolex Sub 14060M vs IWC 3548-05

Post by marchone » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:47 am

Two classics; one icon. It's hard to compete overall with what is widely regarded as the quintessential iconic dive watch of the 20th century: the Submariner.
only accurate watches are interesting

User avatar
CoachH
Posts: 1247
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:39 pm
Name: Joe
Location: Texas

Re: Rolex Sub 14060M vs IWC 3548-05

Post by CoachH » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:48 am

smalls wrote:Love both of those and they both cover a lot of ground. The Sub holds a special place in my heart so I would lean towards that one in a matchup but the IWC ain't no slouch either.
I have found that I am most happy with "one watch" type watches. I continue to search for the elusive one watch for everything and both of these are strong contenders in my opinion.

User avatar
CoachH
Posts: 1247
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:39 pm
Name: Joe
Location: Texas

Re: Rolex Sub 14060M vs IWC 3548-05

Post by CoachH » Thu Apr 03, 2014 6:09 am

matt.wu wrote:Very nice, Joe. I do enjoy hearing everyone's impressions. Between those two, I do believe the IWC brings more to the table in line with my taste, but they're a great pair.
I agree. I was concerned that the IWC would be too big and bulky, never having even tried one on before. I was pleasantly surprised. The IWC is bigger, but not oversized by any standard. It sits flatly on the wrist and is very close to the same weight.

User avatar
CoachH
Posts: 1247
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:39 pm
Name: Joe
Location: Texas

Re: Rolex Sub 14060M vs IWC 3548-05

Post by CoachH » Thu Apr 03, 2014 6:17 am

Torrid wrote:I think I prefer the Rolex. Diversity, it's an old wooden ship.
Anchorman would agree - my collection is very diverse - if stainless steel, black dialed divers with bracelets are diverse. :lol:

User avatar
CoachH
Posts: 1247
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:39 pm
Name: Joe
Location: Texas

Re: Rolex Sub 14060M vs IWC 3548-05

Post by CoachH » Thu Apr 03, 2014 6:34 am

Sidheguitarist wrote:Man, I am–and have been–so into the idea of subs for so long that it's hard not to side with the proven classic.

That said and true: that IWC, with the internal bezel, is just bonus. I might actually have to go IWC on this as well, if I can bring myself to ignore historical precedence.
The internal bezel is the shiznit! It has some kind of ball bearing system that clicks once and locks. Very cool, indeed.

JBZ
Mr. Tasseled Loafer
Posts: 11224
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:03 am
Name: Jeff

Re: Rolex Sub 14060M vs IWC 3548-05

Post by JBZ » Thu Apr 03, 2014 6:35 am

Very nice - I'd be happy to own either one.
Image

User avatar
CGSshorty
Admin
Posts: 33929
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 5:18 pm
Location: Boynton Beach, FL

Re: Rolex Sub 14060M vs IWC 3548-05

Post by CGSshorty » Thu Apr 03, 2014 11:18 am

Great looking IWC.
"It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever."
David St. Hubbins

Minordamage
Posts: 866
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 6:46 pm
Name: Josh
Location: Maryland

Re: Rolex Sub 14060M vs IWC 3548-05

Post by Minordamage » Fri Apr 18, 2014 7:36 pm

The new Glidelock clasp is great, but Rolex still has a long way to go until there bracelets are comparable to some of the other brands competing at their price point (IWC, Blancpain, etc)

Josh
Josh

User avatar
matt.wu
Wu
Posts: 29837
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:33 pm
Name: m@
Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA

Re: Rolex Sub 14060M vs IWC 3548-05

Post by matt.wu » Fri Apr 18, 2014 7:38 pm

Minordamage wrote:The new Glidelock clasp is great, but Rolex still has a long way to go until there bracelets are comparable to some of the other brands competing at their price point (IWC, Blancpain, etc)

Josh
I disagree with this. I think they're all a wash now. :)
:htfu:

User avatar
toxicavenger
President Tranny
Posts: 48115
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:25 am
Name: HeadDIK
Location: Colorado Springs

Re: Rolex Sub 14060M vs IWC 3548-05

Post by toxicavenger » Fri Apr 18, 2014 7:41 pm

The Sub is classic but the IWC is more refined imo. Both serve a different purpose imo. Congrats

Minordamage
Posts: 866
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 6:46 pm
Name: Josh
Location: Maryland

Re: Rolex Sub 14060M vs IWC 3548-05

Post by Minordamage » Fri Apr 18, 2014 8:06 pm

matt.wu wrote:
Minordamage wrote:The new Glidelock clasp is great, but Rolex still has a long way to go until there bracelets are comparable to some of the other brands competing at their price point (IWC, Blancpain, etc)

Josh
I disagree with this. I think they're all a wash now. :)
The only thing that is awash is Rolex with bracelet envy.

:bootyshake: :stir:

Josh
Josh

Minordamage
Posts: 866
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 6:46 pm
Name: Josh
Location: Maryland

Re: Rolex Sub 14060M vs IWC 3548-05

Post by Minordamage » Fri Apr 18, 2014 8:07 pm

toxicavenger wrote:The Sub is classic but the IWC is more refined imo. Both serve a different purpose imo. Congrats
No doubt :clap:

Josh
Josh

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 285 guests