Short review of the TAG Heuer Aquaracer WAN 2110 300m
- Henryj
- Bubblehead
- Posts: 4483
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:17 pm
- Name: Old guy
- Location: Wapakoneta, Ohio
Short review of the TAG Heuer Aquaracer WAN 2110 300m
OK, I've had this one since last November and thought it was time for a short write-up.
This is the new replacement for the previous WAB model. There are a few differences, most obvious is that they went to a longer arrow head shape on the second hand and it's orange instead of red. It's a bit more shiny as well with polished case sides and the edges of the links.
Bezel: A huge improvement. The previous one was Seamaster-ish with facets that were hard to grip. Now, it's properly "grippy", and has a bit of bling with the six raised tabs being polished. This has been called an aluminum bezel, but as far as I can tell, it's a reference to the insert, not the bezel itself. 120 clicks, smooth with just enough resistance to movement and no backlash.
Case: Brushed top and lugs with polished sides. It has the Aquaracer bump at 9 o'clock which is more noticeable in pics than on the wrist. 316L stainless steel. Short of some exotic material or funky construction method, that's about all you can say about a case. About 41mm diameter, and a bit taller than a Seamaster Pro, call it about 13mm or so, but still fits under a shirt cuff.
Dial: Matte black with applied markers. The center section is depressed a tiny bit from the outer portion, just enough to create a ring effect. A nice touch that adds a bit of detail to the dial. As an aside, the inner edge of the second hand's arrowhead tracks right along the ring. Another thing I like about TAG automatics is that the logo is monochrome, not brightly coloered like the quartz models. It's a bit classier, I think.
Hands: Polished and lumed. They aren't exactly sword type, but they do widen slightly from base to tip.
Bracelet: 20mm at the case with SEL, tapering to 16 at the clasp. All brushed on top, polished on the sides. This one uses pins and collars for adjustment. 20/16 sounds a bit dainty, but it seems to fit the watch. I think TAG was going for a classic/dress diver rather than a serious tool watch like the 500m. The clasp is standard with a foldout extension.
Caseback: Brushed stainless screw down with the dive helmet logo deeply engraved (or cast) into the back, but without the wave background of the previous model. Markings include the standard info about the watc, plus model number and S/N.
Crystal: Flat sapphire, no apparent AR that I can see.
Lume: average, I'd say. I don't check the overnight readability of my watch when I roll out of bed in the morning, so I can't really discuss long-term persistence, but it's good enough in the evening without a flashlight charge shot.
Movement: Called the TAG Calibre 5. if I were the kind of person who would let a new watch run in for six weeks, decide that +6 sec/day was too fast, and use his O. Frei caseback tool to open it up and tweak it, I'd be able to report that it appears to be a Sellita SW200 movement (26 jewels vice 25 in a 2824), with a TAG signed rotor. Also, I'd be able to report there's a plastic movement spacer that looks to be specific to the watch rather than a generic cut to fit.
Again, if I were that guy, I'd now be able to report +3 sec/week. Say what you want about the Sellita vs. ETA debate, I got no complaints. I do know that I would void the warranty if TAG knew that I'd opened up the watch, although there's no red dot like an Omega.
In summary, TAG don't seem to get no respect, but I'd add this to any short list of simple, classic black dial divers. Like a lady's "little black dress", everyone needs a simple black diver that goes with everything. For me, this Aquaracer is it.
Henry
This is the new replacement for the previous WAB model. There are a few differences, most obvious is that they went to a longer arrow head shape on the second hand and it's orange instead of red. It's a bit more shiny as well with polished case sides and the edges of the links.
Bezel: A huge improvement. The previous one was Seamaster-ish with facets that were hard to grip. Now, it's properly "grippy", and has a bit of bling with the six raised tabs being polished. This has been called an aluminum bezel, but as far as I can tell, it's a reference to the insert, not the bezel itself. 120 clicks, smooth with just enough resistance to movement and no backlash.
Case: Brushed top and lugs with polished sides. It has the Aquaracer bump at 9 o'clock which is more noticeable in pics than on the wrist. 316L stainless steel. Short of some exotic material or funky construction method, that's about all you can say about a case. About 41mm diameter, and a bit taller than a Seamaster Pro, call it about 13mm or so, but still fits under a shirt cuff.
Dial: Matte black with applied markers. The center section is depressed a tiny bit from the outer portion, just enough to create a ring effect. A nice touch that adds a bit of detail to the dial. As an aside, the inner edge of the second hand's arrowhead tracks right along the ring. Another thing I like about TAG automatics is that the logo is monochrome, not brightly coloered like the quartz models. It's a bit classier, I think.
Hands: Polished and lumed. They aren't exactly sword type, but they do widen slightly from base to tip.
Bracelet: 20mm at the case with SEL, tapering to 16 at the clasp. All brushed on top, polished on the sides. This one uses pins and collars for adjustment. 20/16 sounds a bit dainty, but it seems to fit the watch. I think TAG was going for a classic/dress diver rather than a serious tool watch like the 500m. The clasp is standard with a foldout extension.
Caseback: Brushed stainless screw down with the dive helmet logo deeply engraved (or cast) into the back, but without the wave background of the previous model. Markings include the standard info about the watc, plus model number and S/N.
Crystal: Flat sapphire, no apparent AR that I can see.
Lume: average, I'd say. I don't check the overnight readability of my watch when I roll out of bed in the morning, so I can't really discuss long-term persistence, but it's good enough in the evening without a flashlight charge shot.
Movement: Called the TAG Calibre 5. if I were the kind of person who would let a new watch run in for six weeks, decide that +6 sec/day was too fast, and use his O. Frei caseback tool to open it up and tweak it, I'd be able to report that it appears to be a Sellita SW200 movement (26 jewels vice 25 in a 2824), with a TAG signed rotor. Also, I'd be able to report there's a plastic movement spacer that looks to be specific to the watch rather than a generic cut to fit.
Again, if I were that guy, I'd now be able to report +3 sec/week. Say what you want about the Sellita vs. ETA debate, I got no complaints. I do know that I would void the warranty if TAG knew that I'd opened up the watch, although there's no red dot like an Omega.
In summary, TAG don't seem to get no respect, but I'd add this to any short list of simple, classic black dial divers. Like a lady's "little black dress", everyone needs a simple black diver that goes with everything. For me, this Aquaracer is it.
Henry
If you put a large switch in some cave somewhere, with a sign on it saying 'End-of-the-World Switch. PLEASE DO NOT TOUCH', the paint wouldn't even have time to dry.
- SCM64
- Global Mod/Sinn fanboy
- Posts: 16523
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:27 pm
- Location: N27° 56.79', W82° 27.55'
Re: Short review of the TAG Heuer Aquaracer WAN 2110 300m
Thank you Henry for taking the time to write up such a good review.
Steven
Sexually Desirable RockStar Moderator
Sexually Desirable RockStar Moderator
Re: Short review of the TAG Heuer Aquaracer WAN 2110 300m
I really like that one. The bezel, indeed, is a huge improvement. Thanks for the write-up!
Re: Short review of the TAG Heuer Aquaracer WAN 2110 300m
I like this one too. Very down to business. Thanks for the writeup!
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Re: Short review of the TAG Heuer Aquaracer WAN 2110 300m
Cool watch, Henry! You KNOW I like mine.... Yours is the updated model and I like your bezel better than mine.
I have to disagree about the lume, though. Mine is as bright as my Omega PO. It has smaller hands and indices, of course, but the brightness lasts all night.
Thanks for a great write up!
I have to disagree about the lume, though. Mine is as bright as my Omega PO. It has smaller hands and indices, of course, but the brightness lasts all night.
Thanks for a great write up!
VR/
Paul
SI VI PACEM, PARA BELLUM
Paul
SI VI PACEM, PARA BELLUM
Re: Short review of the TAG Heuer Aquaracer WAN 2110 300m
great review
we def need to see more of those around here
we def need to see more of those around here
Pasquale
NSC
NSC
- Diaboliq
- Strap Maker Extraordinaire
- Posts: 2871
- Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 4:24 am
- Name: Joe
- Location: Düsseldorf, Germany
- Contact:
Re: Short review of the TAG Heuer Aquaracer WAN 2110 300m
Nice neat review. I never had a thing for TAGs, just don't know.. This one is rather nice tho; classic dressy diver.
btw I may expect too much but if a parnis $50 watch has a metal movement holder, is it just too much to expect it on expensive >$800 divers...? Damn..
btw I may expect too much but if a parnis $50 watch has a metal movement holder, is it just too much to expect it on expensive >$800 divers...? Damn..
- Henryj
- Bubblehead
- Posts: 4483
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:17 pm
- Name: Old guy
- Location: Wapakoneta, Ohio
Re: Short review of the TAG Heuer Aquaracer WAN 2110 300m
Paul,
As the proud owner/operator of a 57 year old prostate, I had a few opportunities to check it in the dark last night (0130, 0300, and when I got up at 0500). You're right. Not the biggest areas covered, but bright enough to read all night long. This was the first time I actually checked it during the night.
Henry
As the proud owner/operator of a 57 year old prostate, I had a few opportunities to check it in the dark last night (0130, 0300, and when I got up at 0500). You're right. Not the biggest areas covered, but bright enough to read all night long. This was the first time I actually checked it during the night.
Henry
On the movement holder, I dunno if I agree. Metal to metal will transmit more shock and vibration from the outside of the case to the movement, where plastic might absorb a bit by giving a little.deepcdvr wrote:Cool watch, Henry! You KNOW I like mine.... Yours is the updated model and I like your bezel better than mine.
I have to disagree about the lume, though. Mine is as bright as my Omega PO. It has smaller hands and indices, of course, but the brightness lasts all night.
Thanks for a great write up!
If you put a large switch in some cave somewhere, with a sign on it saying 'End-of-the-World Switch. PLEASE DO NOT TOUCH', the paint wouldn't even have time to dry.
Re: Short review of the TAG Heuer Aquaracer WAN 2110 300m
I don't know anything about movements since I'm not a real WIS, but that little TAG is taking a beating and keeping perfect time. When I put that one on, I wear it 24/7 - showers, running, lifting, etc.. - and it seems like a tough, no nonsense piece. I've gone through a lot of watches in the last couple of years as you all know and most of them have some sort of 'drama' involved. What I mean by that is that I have to be careful with them to a certain extent ie: "no sand, no obstacle course, no swim runs", etc for fear of scratching the watch or screwing up the movement somehow. No issues with this one at all.Henryj wrote: On the movement holder, I dunno if I agree. Metal to metal will transmit more shock and vibration from the outside of the case to the movement, where plastic might absorb a bit by giving a little.
VR/
Paul
SI VI PACEM, PARA BELLUM
Paul
SI VI PACEM, PARA BELLUM
- Henryj
- Bubblehead
- Posts: 4483
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:17 pm
- Name: Old guy
- Location: Wapakoneta, Ohio
Re: Short review of the TAG Heuer Aquaracer WAN 2110 300m
A quick update. I set this watch on 10 January, using my atomic radio clock.. This morning, two weeks later, it's at + 2.5 seconds.
If you put a large switch in some cave somewhere, with a sign on it saying 'End-of-the-World Switch. PLEASE DO NOT TOUCH', the paint wouldn't even have time to dry.
Re: Short review of the TAG Heuer Aquaracer WAN 2110 300m
Henry
Nice watch and review.
Nice watch and review.
Re: Short review of the TAG Heuer Aquaracer WAN 2110 300m
Great!Henryj wrote:A quick update. I set this watch on 10 January, using my atomic radio clock.. This morning, two weeks later, it's at + 2.5 seconds.
Yeah, mine is also extremely accurate.
VR/
Paul
SI VI PACEM, PARA BELLUM
Paul
SI VI PACEM, PARA BELLUM
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 147 guests