Budget audiophile gear recommendations
- 59yukon01
- 1.21 gigawatts?!
- Posts: 10483
- Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 8:49 am
- Name: David
- Location: Louisville, KY
Re: Budget audiophile gear recommendations
Another example of the benefit of a sub is I recently bought just a soundbar with small built in subs supposedly. This was for a bedroom we made into a media room
Was extremely disappointed and felt I had to turn the volume up, and then heard too much upper highs.
Returned it for the model that includes a separate wireless sub. Even though the soundbars were the exact same, the addition of the sub was as different as night and day in the quality of sound while watching TV and also with music.
Was extremely disappointed and felt I had to turn the volume up, and then heard too much upper highs.
Returned it for the model that includes a separate wireless sub. Even though the soundbars were the exact same, the addition of the sub was as different as night and day in the quality of sound while watching TV and also with music.
- Bradystraps
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 6:50 am
- Name: Todd
Re: Budget audiophile gear recommendations
Certainly understand the science behind it. I’ve just never had a need for it. Even with my new Studio 530’s, I find the bass perfectly fine and can always use the tone/loudness controls if needed.BlueSky wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2019 2:54 pmSmall speakers (and a lot of big ones, too) simply can't reproduce sound below a certain frequency, period. It's just science, namely physics. You're just not going to hear all the data, if you will, from any source you throw at it. In other words, you need a sub to reproduce all that data that a bookshelf, for example, can't.Bradystraps wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2019 12:56 pmI’ve never listened to a sub for 2 channel music. If the speaker has good bass response, no need IMO.
Chris (unsub073) and I have very capable bookshelves (use mine as surrounds) and I would not use either without a sub. Two channel, especially.
- jeckyll
- Honorary Assistant Jr. Hall Monitor in Training
- Posts: 11909
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:11 pm
- Name: Björn
Re: Budget audiophile gear recommendations
So much is down to individual preference, the kind of music you listen to and what you enjoy (and possibly if you live in a house or condo).Bradystraps wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2019 5:21 pmCertainly understand the science behind it. I’ve just never had a need for it. Even with my new Studio 530’s, I find the bass perfectly fine and can always use the tone/loudness controls if needed.BlueSky wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2019 2:54 pmSmall speakers (and a lot of big ones, too) simply can't reproduce sound below a certain frequency, period. It's just science, namely physics. You're just not going to hear all the data, if you will, from any source you throw at it. In other words, you need a sub to reproduce all that data that a bookshelf, for example, can't.Bradystraps wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2019 12:56 pmI’ve never listened to a sub for 2 channel music. If the speaker has good bass response, no need IMO.
Chris (unsub073) and I have very capable bookshelves (use mine as surrounds) and I would not use either without a sub. Two channel, especially.
A few years ago I spend time each week for a month changing my speaker setups / amp config. Different positions, different cross over points, small vs. large setting for fronts, different toe in, distance from the wall, you name it.
For some settings, you'd have to try hard to see if the difference was really noticeable, for other (like running with just the front speakers for stereo listening, with no sub) I could tell quickly.
I found that really spending a bit of time with it was the only way to tell. And, once I was used to getting down close to 20 Hz, it was hard to give up. That, plus the fact that speaker specs may say they go down to below 50 Hz, it's not where they do their best work.
Just my $0.02
We all have the same enemy. The enemy is the tyranny of the dull mind. - - Tom Robbins
Re: Budget audiophile gear recommendations
Good post.jeckyll wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2019 6:49 pmSo much is down to individual preference, the kind of music you listen to and what you enjoy (and possibly if you live in a house or condo).Bradystraps wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2019 5:21 pmBlueSky wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2019 2:54 pmSmall speakers (and a lot of big ones, too) simply can't reproduce sound below a certain frequency, period. It's just science, namely physics. You're just not going to hear all the data, if you will, from any source you throw at it. In other words, you need a sub to reproduce all that data that a bookshelf, for example, can't.Bradystraps wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2019 12:56 pmI’ve never listened to a sub for 2 channel music. If the speaker has good bass response, no need IMO.
Chris (unsub073) and I have very capable bookshelves (use mine as surrounds) and I would not use either without a sub. Two channel, especially.
Certainly understand the science behind it. I’ve just never had a need for it. Even with my new Studio 530’s, I find the bass perfectly fine and can always use the tone/loudness controls if needed.
A few years ago I spend time each week for a month changing my speaker setups / amp config. Different positions, different cross over points, small vs. large setting for fronts, different toe in, distance from the wall, you name it.
For some settings, you'd have to try hard to see if the difference was really noticeable, for other (like running with just the front speakers for stereo listening, with no sub) I could tell quickly.
I found that really spending a bit of time with it was the only way to tell. And, once I was used to getting down close to 20 Hz, it was hard to give up. That, plus the fact that speaker specs may say they go down to below 50 Hz, it's not where they do their best work.
Just my $0.02
For the sake of discussion, I'm referring to the use of an AVR or pre-pro as is Bjorn.
- Bradystraps
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 6:50 am
- Name: Todd
Re: Budget audiophile gear recommendations
For 5.1/6.1 video, I definitely use a sub. But in my 2 channel, I just never have. I may look for an inexpensive sub and give it a whirl though.
- jeckyll
- Honorary Assistant Jr. Hall Monitor in Training
- Posts: 11909
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:11 pm
- Name: Björn
Re: Budget audiophile gear recommendations
Looking forward to your impressions!Bradystraps wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2019 11:17 amFor 5.1/6.1 video, I definitely use a sub. But in my 2 channel, I just never have. I may look for an inexpensive sub and give it a whirl though.
We all have the same enemy. The enemy is the tyranny of the dull mind. - - Tom Robbins
Re: Budget audiophile gear recommendations
I still need to do some re arranging on my room, but can you get away with either an 8 or 10 inch sub?BlueSky wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2019 2:54 pmSmall speakers (and a lot of big ones, too) simply can't reproduce sound below a certain frequency, period. It's just science, namely physics. You're just not going to hear all the data, if you will, from any source you throw at it. In other words, you need a sub to reproduce all that data that a bookshelf, for example, can't.Bradystraps wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2019 12:56 pmI’ve never listened to a sub for 2 channel music. If the speaker has good bass response, no need IMO.
Chris (unsub073) and I have very capable bookshelves (use mine as surrounds) and I would not use either without a sub. Two channel, especially.
Re: Budget audiophile gear recommendations
Subs are such a hassle to deal with from a room design/WAF standpoint. Of course, I'm going to recommend the 10". I just hate to see, especially since you have the MAs, somebody skimp on a sub. It's just not worth it, IMO. Pretty much universal advice is to upgrade speakers first, then electronics.
You have those covered, minus the sub. There's a few, not many, options for a good small sub if the size of the box is prohibitive. After the holidays, shout back and we'll figure it out.
You have those covered, minus the sub. There's a few, not many, options for a good small sub if the size of the box is prohibitive. After the holidays, shout back and we'll figure it out.
Re: Budget audiophile gear recommendations
Chris...didn't realize Crutchfield was selling SVS. That was one of my recs earlier. Take a look.
Re: Budget audiophile gear recommendations
Will do. I may end up shooting you a picture of the room and we can go from there.BlueSky wrote: ↑Mon Dec 23, 2019 9:00 amSubs are such a hassle to deal with from a room design/WAF standpoint. Of course, I'm going to recommend the 10". I just hate to see, especially since you have the MAs, somebody skimp on a sub. It's just not worth it, IMO. Pretty much universal advice is to upgrade speakers first, then electronics.
You have those covered, minus the sub. There's a few, not many, options for a good small sub if the size of the box is prohibitive. After the holidays, shout back and we'll figure it out.
Re: Budget audiophile gear recommendations
Sounds great.unsub073 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 24, 2019 8:30 amWill do. I may end up shooting you a picture of the room and we can go from there.BlueSky wrote: ↑Mon Dec 23, 2019 9:00 amSubs are such a hassle to deal with from a room design/WAF standpoint. Of course, I'm going to recommend the 10". I just hate to see, especially since you have the MAs, somebody skimp on a sub. It's just not worth it, IMO. Pretty much universal advice is to upgrade speakers first, then electronics.
You have those covered, minus the sub. There's a few, not many, options for a good small sub if the size of the box is prohibitive. After the holidays, shout back and we'll figure it out.
- Bradystraps
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 6:50 am
- Name: Todd
Re: Budget audiophile gear recommendations
Most recent addiction... vintage receivers, again!
After building my main system to completion, I have been building my office system and now that has turned into collecting. Like watches, my wife is not entertained by this, or the FedEx/UPS/USPS deliveries weekly.
What I have found is that instead of getting lured in the monster receiver craze (Pioneer SX-1250, Marantz 2285, Sansui 9090DB, Yamaha CR-2020 etc.), the low-mid watters are where the value and best SQ is, IMHO. I have a 1969 Sony STR-6050 in pristine condition that sounds absolutely stunning. Bought it from my tech for $80. Looks great too! I also purchased a Sherwood S-7110 ($120) and HK 330C ($250) and noth also sound wonderful.
I only buy serviced/recapped units though and cannot recommend that enough, unless you want to do the work yourself.
Try em out. Late 60's through around 1978. After that, most went downhill.
After building my main system to completion, I have been building my office system and now that has turned into collecting. Like watches, my wife is not entertained by this, or the FedEx/UPS/USPS deliveries weekly.
What I have found is that instead of getting lured in the monster receiver craze (Pioneer SX-1250, Marantz 2285, Sansui 9090DB, Yamaha CR-2020 etc.), the low-mid watters are where the value and best SQ is, IMHO. I have a 1969 Sony STR-6050 in pristine condition that sounds absolutely stunning. Bought it from my tech for $80. Looks great too! I also purchased a Sherwood S-7110 ($120) and HK 330C ($250) and noth also sound wonderful.
I only buy serviced/recapped units though and cannot recommend that enough, unless you want to do the work yourself.
Try em out. Late 60's through around 1978. After that, most went downhill.
Budget audiophile gear recommendations
I have a Yamaha RX-V995 sitting in the garage. I think I paid about $1k for it in the late 90s. It’s still in great condition.
"It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever."
David St. Hubbins
David St. Hubbins
- 59yukon01
- 1.21 gigawatts?!
- Posts: 10483
- Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 8:49 am
- Name: David
- Location: Louisville, KY
Re: Budget audiophile gear recommendations
My first receiver was a 100 watt Sherwood bought in 78 or 79. It got trashed at a party in the early 80's, when some girl spilled her beer on it.
I currently have a Onkyo TX-DS797 THX certified I've been using for 20+ years now.
I currently have a Onkyo TX-DS797 THX certified I've been using for 20+ years now.
- jeckyll
- Honorary Assistant Jr. Hall Monitor in Training
- Posts: 11909
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:11 pm
- Name: Björn
Re: Budget audiophile gear recommendations
Those old receivers are great for headphones, as the ones back then had 'proper' setups. A lot of headphone guys buy them and only use them to drive headphones only.
If I had more space I'd love to build a bit of a setup with one, but not going to happen.
I did pick up a Dragonfly Red just before things shut down everywhere and am very pleased with it, very nice clean sound.
If I had more space I'd love to build a bit of a setup with one, but not going to happen.
I did pick up a Dragonfly Red just before things shut down everywhere and am very pleased with it, very nice clean sound.
We all have the same enemy. The enemy is the tyranny of the dull mind. - - Tom Robbins
Re: Budget audiophile gear recommendations
I think my parents had a very similar Sherwood model. Your picture fits what I remember. Guessing they bought it late 60’s or very early 1970’s.Bradystraps wrote: ↑Fri May 15, 2020 5:03 pmMost recent addiction... vintage receivers, again!
After building my main system to completion, I have been building my office system and now that has turned into collecting. Like watches, my wife is not entertained by this, or the FedEx/UPS/USPS deliveries weekly.
What I have found is that instead of getting lured in the monster receiver craze (Pioneer SX-1250, Marantz 2285, Sansui 9090DB, Yamaha CR-2020 etc.), the low-mid watters are where the value and best SQ is, IMHO. I have a 1969 Sony STR-6050 in pristine condition that sounds absolutely stunning. Bought it from my tech for $80. Looks great too! I also purchased a Sherwood S-7110 ($120) and HK 330C ($250) and noth also sound wonderful.
I only buy serviced/recapped units though and cannot recommend that enough, unless you want to do the work yourself.
Try em out. Late 60's through around 1978. After that, most went downhill.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 332 guests