Me too. To me, this is the reissue to have. The price makes it even better.
Not the exact reissue version, but still kicking myself in the ass for selling this one...
Me too. To me, this is the reissue to have. The price makes it even better.
Dude, that is awful. You should immediately sell that watch. To me.hoppyjr wrote: ↑Wed Nov 28, 2018 2:17 pmAfter wearing mine quite a lot I’m only able to find three things I’d change;
* this watch should have 22mm lug width
* drilled lugs
* the spring bar holes are too small in diameter
That last one is really odd. Normal spring bars have tips that are
.09-1.2mm and there are countless options for replacements, both traditional and “shoulder-less”. The Certina wouldn’t even accept my bars that had .08 mm tips, so I ordered some with .07 mm from Ofrei and those work. Problem is those are really thin bars, much thinner than I prefer. Most of what you have on hand won’t fit, or it won’t drop fully into the hole.
Yes, it’s nitpicking but it would be better with 1.0 mm (Sinn) to 1.2 mm (Seiko-Rolex) holes, even .09 (Marathon).
demer03 wrote:“No” on 22mm straps
20 and 19 are perfect.
Now get off my lawn!
I’m thinking it’s pretty minor, but it’s the only negative I could find.Ryeguy wrote:Dude, that is awful. You should immediately sell that watch. To me.hoppyjr wrote: ↑Wed Nov 28, 2018 2:17 pmAfter wearing mine quite a lot I’m only able to find three things I’d change;
* this watch should have 22mm lug width
* drilled lugs
* the spring bar holes are too small in diameter
That last one is really odd. Normal spring bars have tips that are
.09-1.2mm and there are countless options for replacements, both traditional and “shoulder-less”. The Certina wouldn’t even accept my bars that had .08 mm tips, so I ordered some with .07 mm from Ofrei and those work. Problem is those are really thin bars, much thinner than I prefer. Most of what you have on hand won’t fit, or it won’t drop fully into the hole.
Yes, it’s nitpicking but it would be better with 1.0 mm (Sinn) to 1.2 mm (Seiko-Rolex) holes, even .09 (Marathon).
Bahaha. Too true.
It's been a while since I had an NAFT, but I think this pic clearly shows the 52mm L2L to be an exaggeration.
I really don't see how a coating which goes on the outside of the crystal would not be affected by polishing. Unless the coating is part of the crystals make up I dont' think I would take the chance.
Maybe it is very superficial and a polish simply removes it? Although if that were true I would think it would get worse before it got better..... like when I removed the AR from a U1 long ago.toxicavenger wrote: ↑Tue Dec 04, 2018 3:34 pmI really don't see how a coating which goes on the outside of the crystal would not be affected by polishing. Unless the coating is part of the crystals make up I dont' think I would take the chance.
You still wear your Doxa 1200?dukerules wrote:I love this watch, but I wish it was a tad smaller. Looking for a slightly smaller beater, but this has a longer L2L than the U1, MM300, or Pelagos. Dang.
I do. Mostly on vacation and in the summer.Jeep99dad wrote:You still wear your Doxa 1200?dukerules wrote:I love this watch, but I wish it was a tad smaller. Looking for a slightly smaller beater, but this has a longer L2L than the U1, MM300, or Pelagos. Dang.
Great pictures, thanks.MikeyLikesIt wrote: ↑Sat Jan 26, 2019 9:11 amGot mine in this week after about a two month wait. Very well done by Certina and I can understand why it's been so well received.
Granted, I've been trending toward smaller watches recently but this is relatively large watch so it's going to be flipped.
It was hard to find good comparison pics when I purchased it so wanted to take some compared to other common divers
Users browsing this forum: AZpops, DocHollidayDDS, mattcantwin and 284 guests