Page 3 of 4
Re: 58
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2018 7:21 am
by Joeprez
^ Perfect! Looks great on the tan straps. You gotta try the real James Bond regimental nato.
Re: 58
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2018 7:42 am
by ericf4
My bitch wrists need to try one of these. I wish they would stop with those rivets though.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Re: 58
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2018 7:45 am
by hoppyjr
Love those strap photos!
Could you grab one on nato on wrist, with the angle being side profile with the 6 o’clock side facing the camera please?
Like this:
and this:
Re: 58
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2018 8:22 am
by dnslater
hoppyjr wrote: ↑Sat Aug 11, 2018 7:45 am
Love those strap photos!
Could you grab one on nato on wrist, with the angle being side profile with the 6 o’clock side facing the camera please?
Had it back on the bracelet, but because you asked nicely.
Single pass Toxic
Double pass Toxic
Pardon the blur
Speedy Pro on ShizNit for reference as it is a great NATO Watch IMHO. It does have a bulging caseback though so you can see the strap from the side.
Re: 58
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2018 8:56 am
by hoppyjr
^ excellent, thank you!
Re: 58
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2018 9:52 am
by demer03
A vintage tropic would be hotness.
Re: 58
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2018 11:38 pm
by toxicavenger
Damn that looks great! congrats on it
Re: 58
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 7:54 am
by jswing
Ugh, you're killing me Nick.
Re: 58
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 10:01 am
by Knome
dnslater wrote: ↑Sat Aug 11, 2018 3:28 am
Thanks all
Yes, it is 20mm.
Thickness is 11.9mm
L to L is 47.6mm
Bezel exactly 39mm
For comparison , a 5 digit Rolex Sub:
Lug width 20mm
Thickness 12.3mm
L to L at 48mm
Bezel is 39.5mm
Thanks! I love my original ETA burgunday BB but this new 58 looks fantastic. Easily the best one they've come out with so far IMO. Can't wait for the variations
Re: 58
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 1:51 pm
by 1954Selmer
For me, those specs/measurements are perfect! I want one.
I recently purchased a cheap micro and it has reminded me that I can't wear thick heavy large watches.
Re: 58
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 10:49 am
by jswing
Re: 58
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 11:14 am
by dnslater
Great photos. The general size and shape of the 58 and Explorer look spot on! Looks like the main difference is that the explorer has a slightly thinner mid-case and more bulging case back.
Re: 58
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 11:34 am
by hoppyjr
Congratulations Jeff! Dibs! (as if it’s leaving lol)
Find me one too :-)
Re: 58
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 11:59 am
by jswing
dnslater wrote: ↑Fri Aug 17, 2018 11:14 am
Great photos. The general size and shape of the 58 and Explorer look spot on! Looks like the main difference is that the explorer has a slightly thinner mid-case and more bulging case back.
That's accurate. The Explorer is more svelte than the 58, but of course the 58 is very svelte as far as divers go.
Re: 58
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 12:03 pm
by 1954Selmer
Great comparison photos!
Re: 58
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 1:39 pm
by substitute
They did an excellent job with the new smaller movement to get that side profile.
Re: 58
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 1:56 pm
by dukerules
Looks amazing. Absolute home run for Tudor. I'm actually not sure there is anything they could do to this watch to make it any better for me. I need one.
Re: 58
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 2:01 pm
by hoppyjr
dukerules wrote:Looks amazing. Absolute home run for Tudor. I'm actually not sure there is anything they could do to this watch to make it any better, except drilled lugs. I need one.
FIFY
Re: 58
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 2:03 pm
by dukerules
Yeah. Ok, you got me.
Re: 58
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 2:29 pm
by jswing
hoppyjr wrote:dukerules wrote:Looks amazing. Absolute home run for Tudor. I'm actually not sure there is anything they could do to this watch to make it any better, except drilled lugs. I need one.
FIFY
That would have made it perfect.
Sent from my LG-K425 using Tapatalk
58
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 2:37 pm
by Rackness
jswing wrote:hoppyjr wrote:dukerules wrote:Looks amazing. Absolute home run for Tudor. I'm actually not sure there is anything they could do to this watch to make it any better, except drilled lugs. I need one.
FIFY
That would have made it perfect.
Sent from my LG-K425 using Tapatalk
The cat’s pajamas
58
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 2:39 pm
by hoppyjr
jswing wrote:hoppyjr wrote:dukerules wrote:Looks amazing. Absolute home run for Tudor. I'm actually not sure there is anything they could do to this watch to make it any better, except drilled lugs. I need one.
FIFY
That would have made it almost perfect. To make it 100% get rid of the gold.
Sent from my LG-K425 using Tapatalk
FIFY too.
Re: 58
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 3:54 pm
by sierra11b
All this did was make me want the Explorer more.
Re: 58
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 4:06 pm
by jswing
hoppyjr wrote:jswing wrote:hoppyjr wrote:dukerules wrote:Looks amazing. Absolute home run for Tudor. I'm actually not sure there is anything they could do to this watch to make it any better, except drilled lugs. I need one.
FIFY
That would have made it almost perfect. To make it 100% get rid of the gold.
Sent from my LG-K425 using Tapatalk
FIFY too.
I like the gold, but I am surprised that Tudor hasn't offered a non-gilt/black bezel combo. Maybe too close to the Rolex sub?
Sent from my LG-K425 using Tapatalk
Re: 58
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 4:08 pm
by jswing
sierra11b wrote:All this did was make me want the Explorer more.
Taking the comparison shots made me want to keep the Explorer as well as the BB.
Sent from my LG-K425 using Tapatalk