Seiko SBDX001 and SBDX017 differences

Come on in and introduce yourself!
General watch talk.
User avatar
marchone
Capt. Obvious
Posts: 14806
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:30 am
Name: Wayne
Location: NYC

Re: Seiko SBDX001 and SBDX017 differences

Post by marchone » Sat Dec 17, 2016 7:27 pm

Chris says that all the time. He's the Strap King.
only accurate watches are interesting

User avatar
andrema
Bean Counter Extraordinaire
Posts: 14535
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:04 pm
Name: William Drayton, Jr.
Location: Gone

Re: Seiko SBDX001 and SBDX017 differences

Post by andrema » Sat Dec 17, 2016 7:36 pm

marchone wrote:Chris says that all the time. He's the Strap-On King.
FTFY
Image

User avatar
CGSshorty
Admin
Posts: 33929
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 5:18 pm
Location: Boynton Beach, FL

Re: Seiko SBDX001 and SBDX017 differences

Post by CGSshorty » Sat Dec 17, 2016 8:03 pm

andrema wrote:
marchone wrote:Chris says that all the time. He's the Strap-On King.
FTFY
:rimshot:
"It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever."
David St. Hubbins

User avatar
andrema
Bean Counter Extraordinaire
Posts: 14535
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:04 pm
Name: William Drayton, Jr.
Location: Gone

Re: Seiko SBDX001 and SBDX017 differences

Post by andrema » Sat Dec 17, 2016 10:11 pm

LOL
Image

User avatar
Torrid
Posts: 6671
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:43 am
Name: Heath
Location: Wisconsin

Re: Seiko SBDX001 and SBDX017 differences

Post by Torrid » Sun Dec 18, 2016 3:09 pm

Seiya has a good price on the 017 right now. It's tempting.

User avatar
CesarG
Mexican
Posts: 11413
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 2:18 pm
Name: Cesar
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Seiko SBDX001 and SBDX017 differences

Post by CesarG » Sun Dec 18, 2016 4:22 pm

Nothing wrong with the old one. The one to have.

User avatar
BBK357
Ban Jacobs
Posts: 28867
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 2:01 pm
Name: Vladimir
Location: Ohio

Re: Seiko SBDX001 and SBDX017 differences

Post by BBK357 » Sun Dec 18, 2016 7:04 pm

CesarG wrote:Nothing wrong with the old one. The one to have.

But you need mod sword hands and rusty buckle admiralty grey strap
DEATH FROM ABOVE
:ak:

User avatar
BBK357
Ban Jacobs
Posts: 28867
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 2:01 pm
Name: Vladimir
Location: Ohio

Re: Seiko SBDX001 and SBDX017 differences

Post by BBK357 » Sun Dec 18, 2016 7:05 pm

marchone wrote:Bought this one owner SBDX001 from Tom (TSD) face to face yesterday. It's in perfect condition.

Image

Nice Wayne!
It's a great watch. Miss mine.

I'd much rather have the 001 as I don't like the new diashueld coating. Seems like a great idea on paper that didn't cross over too well in the real world.
DEATH FROM ABOVE
:ak:

User avatar
marchone
Capt. Obvious
Posts: 14806
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:30 am
Name: Wayne
Location: NYC

Re: Seiko SBDX001 and SBDX017 differences

Post by marchone » Sun Dec 18, 2016 8:25 pm

Thanks Ben. I'm pretty happy with it. I don't think I'd care for the Diashield coating on it either. Too blingy. Previous fear of not liking its height were not well founded. It fits under a shirt cuff easily and since getting the bracelet fitted its top heavy head doesn't flop around at all. All is good.
only accurate watches are interesting

User avatar
TSD
Posts: 2784
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 6:47 am
Name: Tom
Location: So Fla

Re: Seiko SBDX001 and SBDX017 differences

Post by TSD » Sun Dec 18, 2016 8:47 pm

Now that's what I like to hear. Such a cool watch, and I miss it already. :cheers:

User avatar
marchone
Capt. Obvious
Posts: 14806
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:30 am
Name: Wayne
Location: NYC

Re: Seiko SBDX001 and SBDX017 differences

Post by marchone » Sun Dec 18, 2016 8:50 pm

That GS diver you have is pretty special. I don't think I'd miss the MM300 too much with that on my wrist.

:cheers:
only accurate watches are interesting

User avatar
toxicavenger
President Tranny
Posts: 48115
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:25 am
Name: HeadDIK
Location: Colorado Springs

Re: Seiko SBDX001 and SBDX017 differences

Post by toxicavenger » Mon Dec 19, 2016 10:27 am

marchone wrote:That GS diver you have is pretty special. I don't think I'd miss the MM300 too much with that on my wrist.

:cheers:
I wouldn't at all either.

User avatar
marchone
Capt. Obvious
Posts: 14806
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:30 am
Name: Wayne
Location: NYC

Re: Seiko SBDX001 and SBDX017 differences

Post by marchone » Mon Dec 19, 2016 10:29 am

Tom has the blue LE.
only accurate watches are interesting

User avatar
Jamie
I'll slip an extra shrimp on the barbie for you
Posts: 4529
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 6:26 pm
Name: Jamie
Location: Sydney

Re: Seiko SBDX001 and SBDX017 differences

Post by Jamie » Mon Dec 19, 2016 1:28 pm

The 001 for the win but I wouldn't say I can't see a 017 in the watch box future. A great watch and wears great for somthing so small


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

User avatar
sierra11b
Posts: 6309
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 9:37 am
Name: Eric
Location: Kalunicornia

Re: Seiko SBDX001 and SBDX017 differences

Post by sierra11b » Mon Dec 19, 2016 2:45 pm

toxicavenger wrote:
marchone wrote:That GS diver you have is pretty special. I don't think I'd miss the MM300 too much with that on my wrist.

:cheers:
I wouldn't at all either.
You say that but (for me anyway) the MM300 and all mid-range prospexs is where Seiko shines and shows its true tool watch heritage. Sure, the MM300 has its quirks, but as the ex-owner of both I'd take the 001 back all day long and often find myself wanting it back. I'm done with GS because it always felt a little empty in the Seiko DNA dept.

User avatar
sierra11b
Posts: 6309
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 9:37 am
Name: Eric
Location: Kalunicornia

Re: Seiko SBDX001 and SBDX017 differences

Post by sierra11b » Mon Dec 19, 2016 3:01 pm

Jamie wrote:The 001 for the win but I wouldn't say I can't see a 017 in the watch box future. A great watch and wears great for somthing so small
The way I see it it's all about timing, patience, and price. If you're in the market for an MM and a 017 comes up for $1500 when there's no 001s to be had for $1200, then the 017 will get bought.

It'll be interesting to see how Seiko manages the service of the 001. They touted MEMS in the 017 with the underlying fact that parts could be fabricated whenever. If they can do that with the older 8L35s then the 001 is certainly the one to have IMHO. I don't see why they couldn't.

I do miss it.

User avatar
toxicavenger
President Tranny
Posts: 48115
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:25 am
Name: HeadDIK
Location: Colorado Springs

Re: Seiko SBDX001 and SBDX017 differences

Post by toxicavenger » Mon Dec 19, 2016 7:29 pm

sierra11b wrote:
Jamie wrote:The 001 for the win but I wouldn't say I can't see a 017 in the watch box future. A great watch and wears great for somthing so small
The way I see it it's all about timing, patience, and price. If you're in the market for an MM and a 017 comes up for $1500 when there's no 001s to be had for $1200, then the 017 will get bought.

It'll be interesting to see how Seiko manages the service of the 001. They touted MEMS in the 017 with the underlying fact that parts could be fabricated whenever. If they can do that with the older 8L35s then the 001 is certainly the one to have IMHO. I don't see why they couldn't.

I do miss it.
You still can't get parts for the 8l35 in the US. I just tried for Seth and not luck. The watches have to go back to Japan still. It is stupid as hell.

User avatar
Panerai7
Posts: 16728
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:09 pm
Name: Art
Location: North Carolina

Re: Seiko SBDX001 and SBDX017 differences

Post by Panerai7 » Tue Dec 20, 2016 3:27 am

I must have missed it, what's wrong with Diashield?
I loved it on Shogun and would certainly prefer it on MM300

User avatar
andrema
Bean Counter Extraordinaire
Posts: 14535
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:04 pm
Name: William Drayton, Jr.
Location: Gone

Re: Seiko SBDX001 and SBDX017 differences

Post by andrema » Tue Dec 20, 2016 4:45 am

Panerai7 wrote:I must have missed it, what's wrong with Diashield?
I loved it on Shogun and would certainly prefer it on MM300
It wears off after a while
Image

User avatar
Panerai7
Posts: 16728
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:09 pm
Name: Art
Location: North Carolina

Re: Seiko SBDX001 and SBDX017 differences

Post by Panerai7 » Tue Dec 20, 2016 5:34 am

andrema wrote:
Panerai7 wrote:I must have missed it, what's wrong with Diashield?
I loved it on Shogun and would certainly prefer it on MM300
It wears off after a while
Thanks Mark.
So does it adhere to Titanium better than SS?
I gotta say my Shogun has been through a lot without a scratch where a regular SS or Ti would have been murdered

User avatar
Torrid
Posts: 6671
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:43 am
Name: Heath
Location: Wisconsin

Re: Seiko SBDX001 and SBDX017 differences

Post by Torrid » Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:24 am

I do wonder about the long term durability of Diashield. It's doing well on my watch but I have my doubts for 5-10 years down the road of what it actually does. I know we saw that one extreme case where it chipped and I hope that remains a rare one off.

User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 17821
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ithaca, NY USA

Re: Seiko SBDX001 and SBDX017 differences

Post by JP Chestnut » Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:40 am

Torrid wrote:I do wonder about the long term durability of Diashield. It's doing well on my watch but I have my doubts for 5-10 years down the road of what it actually does. I know we saw that one extreme case where it chipped and I hope that remains a rare one off.
I haven't seen another instance that I can recall. There are some pretty old watches with Diashield already. I think it should be fine.

I'd still prefer an older MM300. They're better looking and I couldn't care less about MEMS.

User avatar
Chocodove
Posts: 8976
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:35 pm
Name: Todd
Location: NJ

Re: Seiko SBDX001 and SBDX017 differences

Post by Chocodove » Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:46 am

Personally I wouldn't worry about Diashield at all unless you prefer the look of pure SS. As JP said, there was the one single instance where there appeared to be an issue and it looked like the watch had led a very hard life.
- Todd

User avatar
marchone
Capt. Obvious
Posts: 14806
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:30 am
Name: Wayne
Location: NYC

Re: Seiko SBDX001 and SBDX017 differences

Post by marchone » Tue Dec 20, 2016 7:29 am

Also having a Shogun with Diashield, I prefer the tool watch aestethic of the MM300 bare steel case. It wouldn't be out of character blasted or brushed either.
only accurate watches are interesting

User avatar
andrema
Bean Counter Extraordinaire
Posts: 14535
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:04 pm
Name: William Drayton, Jr.
Location: Gone

Re: Seiko SBDX001 and SBDX017 differences

Post by andrema » Tue Dec 20, 2016 7:38 am

JP Chestnut wrote:
Torrid wrote:I do wonder about the long term durability of Diashield. It's doing well on my watch but I have my doubts for 5-10 years down the road of what it actually does. I know we saw that one extreme case where it chipped and I hope that remains a rare one off.
I haven't seen another instance that I can recall. There are some pretty old watches with Diashield already. I think it should be fine.

I'd still prefer an older MM300. They're better looking and I couldn't care less about MEMS.
I'll take a couple shots of my Shogun bracelet tonight to show the diashield wear on it for an example. It is pretty strange.
Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: kempoman and 616 guests