Sub-$3K divers

Come on in and introduce yourself!
General watch talk.
smellody
Posts: 3221
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 9:03 pm
Name: Christopher

Re: Sub-$3K divers

Post by smellody » Sun May 15, 2016 3:08 pm

Image

Best sub $500 value.

User avatar
deepcdvr
Flipper Extraordinaire
Posts: 13267
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:29 pm
Name: Paul

Re: Sub-$3K divers

Post by deepcdvr » Sun May 15, 2016 3:18 pm

hidden by leaves wrote:
JP Chestnut wrote:Some version of the Omega PO slots in at under $3,000. I like my 2500d a lot.
Yeah I love where the pricepoint seems to be settling on these and the older 2500c's. I've always wanted an XL with the rubber strap and it's nice to know it won't hurt too much to get one when the time is right. Just a great sport/casual watch.

Image

Zack has an 8500 for sale on rubber right now for 2900 :fro:
VR/
Paul

SI VI PACEM, PARA BELLUM

User avatar
Seth
Guy who shoots guns
Posts: 7073
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:36 pm
Location: Virginia international Raceway

Re: Sub-$3K divers

Post by Seth » Sun May 15, 2016 3:40 pm

Image

User avatar
425ranger
OMGWTFBBQ
Posts: 4214
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:54 am
Name: Bill

Re: Sub-$3K divers

Post by 425ranger » Sun May 15, 2016 4:41 pm

My recent daily driver... Great size / visibility / versatility combination.

Image

2500D 42mm PO is a great #2.
Retired
Key West, FL
Have a sparkling day.

User avatar
hidden by leaves
Posts: 2218
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2014 11:09 am
Name: Anthony
Location: Great White North

Re: Sub-$3K divers

Post by hidden by leaves » Sun May 15, 2016 6:42 pm

deepcdvr wrote:
hidden by leaves wrote:
JP Chestnut wrote:Some version of the Omega PO slots in at under $3,000. I like my 2500d a lot.
Yeah I love where the pricepoint seems to be settling on these and the older 2500c's. I've always wanted an XL with the rubber strap and it's nice to know it won't hurt too much to get one when the time is right. Just a great sport/casual watch.

Image

Zack has an 8500 for sale on rubber right now for 2900 :fro:
Yes thank you I have looked at that listing more than once, tempting... I like the 8500 on rubber too. I had a 42mm 8500 on the bracelet but I found it top heavy/too thick. I think the 45 size on rubber wears and looks better (old and new).
Send lawyers, guns and money...

User avatar
425ranger
OMGWTFBBQ
Posts: 4214
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:54 am
Name: Bill

Re: Sub-$3K divers

Post by 425ranger » Sun May 15, 2016 9:56 pm

hidden by leaves wrote:.. I like the 8500 on rubber too. I had a 42mm 8500 on the bracelet but I found it top heavy/too thick. I think the 45 size on rubber wears and looks better (old and new).
I love everything about the 8500 series watches... except how they wear. (wobble wobble)

/Caveat.... No experience with the newest models, they seem more reasonably shaped.
Retired
Key West, FL
Have a sparkling day.

User avatar
jimyritz
Masshole
Posts: 24448
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Name: Mike
Location: Boston

Re: Sub-$3K divers

Post by jimyritz » Mon May 16, 2016 4:19 am

Panerai7 wrote:BBB or 2500D or 8500 if you haggle/get a used one.
Sinn is not a 3K watch. I have had many Sinns and still have one. I'm a fan too like the whole DWC because of some nostalgia, the first decent watch discovered, tacticool, etc... but just because WB sells them for 3K nowadays and $1400 ezm1 is fetching 4K they're not a 3K watch.
Anyway, you already know the answer. #BWITW is Pelagos :thumbsup :

Image
====================

That's a bit unfair....you go off the MSRP and the Sinn falls under Sub 3K-- I wouldn't put an 8500 in the sub 3K category..

Value is a whole other discussion--I hear you when it comes to value or worth..

User avatar
andrema
Bean Counter Extraordinaire
Posts: 14535
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:04 pm
Name: William Drayton, Jr.
Location: Gone

Re: Sub-$3K divers

Post by andrema » Mon May 16, 2016 6:05 am

Seppia wrote:
425ranger wrote:
hidden by leaves wrote:.. I like the 8500 on rubber too. I had a 42mm 8500 on the bracelet but I found it top heavy/too thick. I think the 45 size on rubber wears and looks better (old and new).
I love everything about the 8500 series watches... except how they wear. (wobble wobble)

/Caveat.... No experience with the newest models, they seem more reasonably shaped.
Agree, they are all too tall.
Many new omegas are fairly chunky, which is also the reason why I flipped my MM300 twice.
If it weren't that damn tall i would still have one for sure
My 42mm PO8500 wears quite nice and wears much like a SDc.
Image

User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 17821
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ithaca, NY USA

Re: Sub-$3K divers

Post by JP Chestnut » Mon May 16, 2016 6:24 am

I thought my 2500, and the 8500 I didn't end up getting, wore too large on the chunky bracelet. The 2500 is great on a strap.

User avatar
BBK357
Ban Jacobs
Posts: 28855
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 2:01 pm
Name: Vladimir
Location: Ohio

Re: Sub-$3K divers

Post by BBK357 » Mon May 16, 2016 6:55 am

I had 2500 and 8500 at same time- clear winner is 2500. 8500 way too tall
DEATH FROM ABOVE
:ak:

User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 17821
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ithaca, NY USA

Re: Sub-$3K divers

Post by JP Chestnut » Mon May 16, 2016 7:01 am

BBK357 wrote:I had 2500 and 8500 at same time- clear winner is 2500. 8500 way too tall
I think your old blue Ti 8500 was the shit. Easily the best +/- $4,000 watch around. I'd trade my late 2500D for one.

River Rat
DWC Tribal Council
Posts: 12668
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 6:00 am
Location: Montana

Re: Sub-$3K divers

Post by River Rat » Mon May 16, 2016 7:15 am

Got all these for under 3000 each
Image

Image

Image
And this one for 2000.00 when there was great deals if you were not scared of vintage.

User avatar
Joeprez
Wants to see pics of your wife
Posts: 13850
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 5:36 am
Name: Joe
Location: Puerto Rico

Re: Sub-$3K divers

Post by Joeprez » Mon May 16, 2016 7:49 am

JP Chestnut wrote:
BBK357 wrote:I had 2500 and 8500 at same time- clear winner is 2500. 8500 way too tall
I think your old blue Ti 8500 was the shit. Easily the best +/- $4,000 watch around. I'd trade my late 2500D for one.
Yeah, I think about doing that trade a lot.

On bracelet or the Omega rubber, the 8500 wears ok on my wrist, but I prefer the slimmer 2500. I like slim watches (or at least watches in which the caseback is fairly flat with the lugs, like my ExpII or a TSAR/GSAR), they work better on natos. If I could, I would have the 2500 PO have an even less protruding caseback.

Image
Image

Omega / Tudor / Rolex / Sinn / Doxa / Seiko

User avatar
BBK357
Ban Jacobs
Posts: 28855
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 2:01 pm
Name: Vladimir
Location: Ohio

Re: Sub-$3K divers

Post by BBK357 » Mon May 16, 2016 7:55 am

^^^

My Ti/blue PO was super cool, just not a right fit for me. In that price range I needed something that I could wear almost any day- bracelet, NATO or whatever. My sub was the answer but if my watch budget was bigger to fit a watch like that in my collection I would have kept it.

But comparing it to the 2500, which this thread is not even about, I would keep a 2500d.
DEATH FROM ABOVE
:ak:

User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 17821
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ithaca, NY USA

Re: Sub-$3K divers

Post by JP Chestnut » Mon May 16, 2016 8:00 am

I think the PO8500 would be a pretty terrible watch for NATO wear. A NATO always seems to push a watch up off my wrist. The Ti mesh, on the other hand, is :love: :love: :love:


Since when does anyone care about the intended topic of a thread on DWC?

User avatar
toxicavenger
President Tranny
Posts: 48110
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:25 am
Name: HeadDIK
Location: Colorado Springs

Re: Sub-$3K divers

Post by toxicavenger » Mon May 16, 2016 8:05 am

BBK357 wrote:I had 2500 and 8500 at same time- clear winner is 2500. 8500 way too tall
I agree the, the 8500 was horrible on my wrist. The 2500 was okay but the Tudor case fits flatter.

shaneotool
Posts: 498
Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 1:57 pm
Name: Paul
Location: Arkansas

Re: Sub-$3K divers

Post by shaneotool » Mon May 16, 2016 8:07 am

I'm surprised by all the hate on the 8500 PO. I have the 42mm version and love it. The thickness is way overblown IMO. The watch wears about like the MM300 to me - so it is kind of think - but not ridiculous. It always seems to come down to bracelet fit for me, and I was able to get a perfect fit with an extra half link.

Image

User avatar
BBK357
Ban Jacobs
Posts: 28855
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 2:01 pm
Name: Vladimir
Location: Ohio

Re: Sub-$3K divers

Post by BBK357 » Mon May 16, 2016 8:12 am

The 8500 is good on bracelet- but not many other options.
It's an absolute no go on NATO.


Oh, and I like the 2500 hands better too
DEATH FROM ABOVE
:ak:

JBZ
Mr. Tasseled Loafer
Posts: 11224
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:03 am
Name: Jeff

Re: Sub-$3K divers

Post by JBZ » Mon May 16, 2016 8:13 am

JP Chestnut wrote:I think the PO8500 would be a pretty terrible watch for NATO wear. A NATO always seems to push a watch up off my wrist. The Ti mesh, on the other hand, is :love: :love: :love:


Since when does anyone care about the intended topic of a thread on DWC?
I have come to the conclusion that NATO/Zulu straps look great in pictures and on other people's wrists. As a wrist-girth challenged person, I find they flare out at the sides, and tucking the end of the strap back under the keepers only makes the flare that much more apparent. Plus I find them itchy (which I'm sure someone will tell me means I'm buying the wrong straps, which could be true I suppose).

For sub-$3,000 divers, I do like the looks of the PO and the SMP. The Seiko Marinemaster, too. I would say a mid-nineties Tudor Sub, but "under $3K" ship seems to have sailed on those for now. I'm once again trying a Tudor BB, but I think I may sell or trade it. Something about the BB just doesn't click with me (beyond the lack of a date, but that's a factor).
Image

User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 17821
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ithaca, NY USA

Re: Sub-$3K divers

Post by JP Chestnut » Mon May 16, 2016 8:19 am

I like the BB in pictures, but I found it lacking for some reason in person. I'm generally a lover of watches without crown guards so it seems like a natural fit, but it doesn't work for me. The hokey colored crown spacer thing is lame and affected. I really hate it.

I think best watches around $4,000 is a more interesting topic. There are tons of great options - a Tudor Big Block is the cat's ass, and a Tudor Sub might be doable.

User avatar
unsub073
Posts: 4144
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 6:26 am
Name: chris
Location: Florida

Re: Sub-$3K divers

Post by unsub073 » Mon May 16, 2016 9:36 am

smellody wrote:Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Damn. :love:

User avatar
Knome
Posts: 1677
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:08 pm
Name: Ken
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Sub-$3K divers

Post by Knome » Mon May 16, 2016 11:59 am

omg I need to get a red black bay back on my wrist.

JBZ
Mr. Tasseled Loafer
Posts: 11224
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:03 am
Name: Jeff

Re: Sub-$3K divers

Post by JBZ » Mon May 16, 2016 12:01 pm

Knome wrote:omg I need to get a red black bay back on my wrist.
If you're serious, PM me. I've got a complete set on the strap I'm thinking about moving.
Image

User avatar
andrema
Bean Counter Extraordinaire
Posts: 14535
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:04 pm
Name: William Drayton, Jr.
Location: Gone

Re: Sub-$3K divers

Post by andrema » Mon May 16, 2016 12:47 pm

JBZ wrote:
Knome wrote:omg I need to get a red black bay back on my wrist.
If you're serious, PM me. I've got a complete set on the strap I'm thinking about moving.
PM me, I'll undercut Jeff. :shrug:
Image

User avatar
JP Chestnut
Posts: 17821
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:40 am
Name: Jacob
Location: Ithaca, NY USA

Re: Sub-$3K divers

Post by JP Chestnut » Mon May 16, 2016 12:50 pm

andrema wrote:
JBZ wrote:
Knome wrote:omg I need to get a red black bay back on my wrist.
If you're serious, PM me. I've got a complete set on the strap I'm thinking about moving.
PM me, I'll undercut Jeff. :shrug:
A race to the bottom? I'm in!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], DocHollidayDDS, jeckyll, kempoman, snootydog and 935 guests