Why do so few companies make watches conform to the wrist

Come on in and introduce yourself!
General watch talk.
falcon4311

Re: Why do so few companies make watches conform to the wris

Post by falcon4311 » Sun May 17, 2015 11:15 am

HapaHapa wrote:
Terpits wrote:Image
She's got enough diameter to keep those straps in place.
That's for damn sure.

falcon4311

Re: Why do so few companies make watches conform to the wris

Post by falcon4311 » Sun May 17, 2015 11:16 am

jeckyll wrote:Other examples of watches that hug the wrist include the Sumo and he Oris divers. They are out there :)

Good example of what Nick is talking about are 007/009. Smaller, straight lugs that wear great due to the shorter lug-to-lug :cheers:
I forgot about the Sumo, that is another watch that has an amazing fit.

User avatar
gwells
Posts: 8970
Joined: Sat May 24, 2014 11:05 am
Name: Greg
Location: NoVA

Re: Why do so few companies make watches conform to the wris

Post by gwells » Sun May 17, 2015 11:46 am

falcon4311 wrote:
HapaHapa wrote:
Terpits wrote:Image
She's got enough diameter to keep those straps in place.
That's for damn sure.
those are anything but flat.

User avatar
Terpits
Creepy Tudor Guy
Posts: 6174
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2014 9:06 am
Name: Peter
Location: Hill Country TX

Re: Why do so few companies make watches conform to the wris

Post by Terpits » Sun May 17, 2015 11:51 am

I can't post gifs.
She's saying she doesn't give an F

But yes, who cares what she's saying.
:rimshot:

Clem
Posts: 256
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 5:07 pm
Name: Clem
Location: YEG

Re: Why do so few companies make watches conform to the wris

Post by Clem » Sun May 17, 2015 1:57 pm

Don you pick the weirdest things to focus on.... :scratch:

Clem
Posts: 256
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 5:07 pm
Name: Clem
Location: YEG

Re: Why do so few companies make watches conform to the wris

Post by Clem » Sun May 17, 2015 2:00 pm

matt.wu wrote:
I really don't understand that way your mind works sometimes, dude. :lol:
Join the club Matt. :cheers:

If you're this perplexed with him online, imagine what we go through when we meet with him in person. :doh:

User avatar
Joeprez
Wants to see pics of your wife
Posts: 13851
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 5:36 am
Name: Joe
Location: Puerto Rico

Re: Why do so few companies make watches conform to the wris

Post by Joeprez » Sun May 17, 2015 3:44 pm

namor wrote:
dnslater wrote:This used to be a non issue, but in recent years people started taking classic watch shapes/profiles that were designed to be 34, 38, or 40mm and blowing them up to 44 or 46mm - and thus you have a lug overhang issue. Perhaps watches shouldn't have a lug to lug equal to the wearers wrist diameter?
+1

Just keep the lug-to-lug under 48mm and 90% of these issues disappear.
Perfect lug to lug distance.
Image

Omega / Tudor / Rolex / Sinn / Doxa / Seiko

falcon4311

Re: Why do so few companies make watches conform to the wris

Post by falcon4311 » Sun May 17, 2015 9:16 pm

Clem wrote:
matt.wu wrote:
I really don't understand that way your mind works sometimes, dude. :lol:
Join the club Matt. :cheers:

If you're this perplexed with him online, imagine what we go through when we meet with him in person. :doh:
Clemster, I don't use this expression very often but for you...SUCK MY ASS! :bootyshake:

User avatar
t20569cald
Founder and Owner of Ægir Instruments
Posts: 2157
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 7:20 am
Location: Australia

Re: Why do so few companies make watches conform to the wris

Post by t20569cald » Mon May 18, 2015 12:15 am

falcon4311 wrote:like this? I threw on my newly acquired Seiko Spotura and for some reason looked downward at my wrist. It hit me almost immediately that this is the only watch next to my IWC Aquatimer that actually hugs the wrist. Not one of my other higher end watches fit like this. I am fortunate that I have a relatively flat wrist so I can get away with many watches that a buddy of mine can't due to his round wrist.

I guess that's what prompted me to post this. For guys like my buddy, I know he'd much rather have watches hug the wrist as opposed to sitting high on the wrist. So why do we not see more watches designed to fit the wrist? My Rolex is as flat as a board, it looks okay on my wrist, however, not so much on a round wrist.

Because it is harder to machine with the curve, takes more time to machine and set up, costs more money because of that and everyone does not have the same wrists.
Middle ground to get it right is the current watches.
Just my opinion.
Image
Rome wasn't built in a day, but i wasn't on that job!


http://www.aegirinstruments.com

User avatar
matt.wu
Wu
Posts: 29836
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:33 pm
Name: m@
Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA

Re: Why do so few companies make watches conform to the wris

Post by matt.wu » Mon May 18, 2015 8:49 am

Clem wrote:
matt.wu wrote:
I really don't understand that way your mind works sometimes, dude. :lol:
Join the club Matt. :cheers:

If you're this perplexed with him online, imagine what we go through when we meet with him in person. :doh:
:lol:
:htfu:

User avatar
jeckyll
Honorary Assistant Jr. Hall Monitor in Training
Posts: 11923
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:11 pm
Name: Björn

Re: Why do so few companies make watches conform to the wris

Post by jeckyll » Mon May 18, 2015 8:54 am

t20569cald wrote:
falcon4311 wrote:like this? I threw on my newly acquired Seiko Spotura and for some reason looked downward at my wrist. It hit me almost immediately that this is the only watch next to my IWC Aquatimer that actually hugs the wrist. Not one of my other higher end watches fit like this. I am fortunate that I have a relatively flat wrist so I can get away with many watches that a buddy of mine can't due to his round wrist.

I guess that's what prompted me to post this. For guys like my buddy, I know he'd much rather have watches hug the wrist as opposed to sitting high on the wrist. So why do we not see more watches designed to fit the wrist? My Rolex is as flat as a board, it looks okay on my wrist, however, not so much on a round wrist.

Because it is harder to machine with the curve, takes more time to machine and set up, costs more money because of that and everyone does not have the same wrists.
Middle ground to get it right is the current watches.
Just my opinion.
... but of course, what do you know about making watches?! :gayumbrella:
We all have the same enemy. The enemy is the tyranny of the dull mind. - - Tom Robbins

User avatar
ZASKAR36
Posts: 686
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 12:49 pm
Name: Corey

Re: Why do so few companies make watches conform to the wris

Post by ZASKAR36 » Mon May 18, 2015 2:08 pm

It's all relative. I've seen guys with larger wrists complaining that some watches they've owned have lugs that taper too much and dig into their wrists.

I think the only time I didn't like the way a watch sat on my 7" wrist was my Gshock GWF1000. Love the watch, hated the fit. Through on nato strap adapters and boom, problem solved.

I actually don't mind flat wearing watches. My Helson SD42 wears pretty flat and feels more like a 44. A trait that I like.
Image

User avatar
ZASKAR36
Posts: 686
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 12:49 pm
Name: Corey

Re: Why do so few companies make watches conform to the wris

Post by ZASKAR36 » Mon May 18, 2015 2:11 pm

matt.wu wrote:
falcon4311 wrote:
matt.wu wrote:
foodle wrote:Everyone's wrist is different. :shrug:
:lol:

That about answers that question.
So lets make all watches with a flat profile? I remember having a Breitling Headwind which I loved until I put it on my wrist, there was zero curve. Flat as a pancake, the lugs stood straight out.
I really don't understand that way your mind works sometimes, dude. :lol:
Image
Image

AtomicTom
Nuclear Personality!!!!
Posts: 13781
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2012 9:59 am
Name: Tom

Re: Why do so few companies make watches conform to the wris

Post by AtomicTom » Tue May 19, 2015 10:20 am

Don, it's a great point, and guess it just has to do with what the industry, or at
least many watch company's or brands have gotten into.

Maybe you have just stumbled onto something though. :o Maybe soon we will see
watch brands actually making removable lugs, and supplying various extra lugs with
their watches. Just like brands do with straps, bracelets, or even bezels. :thumbsup:

User avatar
sierra11b
Posts: 6309
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 9:37 am
Name: Eric
Location: Kalunicornia

Re: Why do so few companies make watches conform to the wris

Post by sierra11b » Tue May 19, 2015 10:33 am

Seems a lot of Grand Seikos conform to the wrist but the exhibition case back on some of the models defeats the purpose as it'll sit higher anyway. SBGE001 comes to mind as a good alternative.

This is why I'm sticking with the classics... The SubC and Speedy may not have drastically curved lugs which conform to the wrist, but they wear small enough to fit like a dream on the flat portion of most wrists. Another good alternative is the practically lug-less Tuna which wears better than most watches with lugs but sits flat.

User avatar
DenverBuff
Posts: 387
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 2:40 pm
Name: Vic
Location: Denver

Re: Why do so few companies make watches conform to the wris

Post by DenverBuff » Tue May 19, 2015 2:17 pm

This has always been my issue with the Steinharts. The 42mm cases aren't the problem but 51 mm lug to lug is a problem when the caseback is that flat and if you have wrists under 7in. I had one (OK, it was a Debaufre) but ended up flipping it because it wore like a brick.

As somebody noted above, Seiko does a really good job of designing their cases such that even their bigger watches don't look ridiculous on smaller wrists. Oris too. Although I never bought one, the TT1's fit a lot better than I thought due to the lug curvature.

User avatar
marchone
Capt. Obvious
Posts: 14806
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:30 am
Name: Wayne
Location: NYC

Re: Why do so few companies make watches conform to the wris

Post by marchone » Tue May 19, 2015 2:24 pm

The ongoing issue is all watch case designs I know of are symmetrical when wrists are not. The top left lug on most watches seems to lift on my wrist.
only accurate watches are interesting

falcon4311

Re: Why do so few companies make watches conform to the wris

Post by falcon4311 » Tue May 19, 2015 8:41 pm

marchone wrote:The ongoing issue is all watch case designs I know of are symmetrical when wrists are not. The top left lug on most watches seems to lift on my wrist.

That seems to be a common issue for many people..

User avatar
Chronos
Posts: 644
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:45 am
Name: Jim
Location: In the lead

Re: Why do so few companies make watches conform to the wris

Post by Chronos » Wed May 20, 2015 10:27 am

An ill-fitting watch chafes my wrist.

Why don't more watches have a silk lining, like my trousers?

User avatar
CGSshorty
Admin
Posts: 33929
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 5:18 pm
Location: Boynton Beach, FL

Re: Why do so few companies make watches conform to the wris

Post by CGSshorty » Wed May 20, 2015 5:45 pm

How does using two giant bolts on the end links equal "clever bracelet integration"?
"It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever."
David St. Hubbins

User avatar
toxicavenger
President Tranny
Posts: 48114
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:25 am
Name: HeadDIK
Location: Colorado Springs

Re: Why do so few companies make watches conform to the wris

Post by toxicavenger » Wed May 20, 2015 6:01 pm

Seppia wrote:
DenverBuff wrote: As somebody noted above, Seiko does a really good job of designing their cases such that even their bigger watches don't look ridiculous on smaller wrists.
Recently though I think at seiko they are smoking something funny, how can you come up with this?

Image

Image

The best part of the article on ablogtowatch was this one:

" It is 48.2mm wide and a hefty 19.7mm thick – as always, though, when it comes to watches with short lugs and clever bracelet integration, wearability remains great even on a smaller wrist"

I was like: are you kidding me? FORTYEIGHTPOINTTWO x NINETEENPOINTSEVEN!
But hey some clever bracelet integration can do miracles!

I can't wait for it to be available at the seiko boutique in NYC, I'll go there and snap a few pictures on my 6.75 wrist.
Then I'll post them asking: do you think it wears well? :D
:roll: :roll: :roll:

User avatar
mikeylacroix
Posts: 3746
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2014 7:00 am
Name: Mike

Re: Why do so few companies make watches conform to the wris

Post by mikeylacroix » Wed May 20, 2015 6:11 pm

Seppia wrote:
DenverBuff wrote: As somebody noted above, Seiko does a really good job of designing their cases such that even their bigger watches don't look ridiculous on smaller wrists.
Recently though I think at seiko they are smoking something funny, how can you come up with this?

Image

Image

The best part of the article on ablogtowatch was this one:

" It is 48.2mm wide and a hefty 19.7mm thick – as always, though, when it comes to watches with short lugs and clever bracelet integration, wearability remains great even on a smaller wrist"

I was like: are you kidding me? FORTYEIGHTPOINTTWO x NINETEENPOINTSEVEN!
But hey some clever bracelet integration can do miracles!

I can't wait for it to be available at the seiko boutique in NYC, I'll go there and snap a few pictures on my 6.75 wrist.
Then I'll post them asking: do you think it wears well? :D

and most importantly: can it go from the surf to the boardroom??does it fit under the cuff???

User avatar
matt.wu
Wu
Posts: 29836
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:33 pm
Name: m@
Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA

Re: Why do so few companies make watches conform to the wris

Post by matt.wu » Wed May 20, 2015 11:50 pm

ABlogToWatch is far from an authority on substance.
:htfu:

User avatar
jeckyll
Honorary Assistant Jr. Hall Monitor in Training
Posts: 11923
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:11 pm
Name: Björn

Re: Why do so few companies make watches conform to the wris

Post by jeckyll » Thu May 21, 2015 7:39 am

matt.wu wrote:ABlogToWatch is far from an authority on substance.
:shock:
We all have the same enemy. The enemy is the tyranny of the dull mind. - - Tom Robbins

User avatar
hoppes-no9
Posts: 2489
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 12:18 am
Name: Dan
Location: Maryland

Re: Why do so few companies make watches conform to the wris

Post by hoppes-no9 » Thu May 21, 2015 8:07 am

matt.wu wrote:
foodle wrote:Everyone's wrist is different. :shrug:
:lol:

That about answers that question.
Yup.

Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AZpops, gr8sw and 234 guests