http://forums.watchuseek.com/showthread.php?t=386243
I'm surprised there was not up one before. It's not like the two threads deleted earlier today (see here if you haven't already viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2842 ) were much out of the ordinary.
They are certainly free to run that however they want. But I just continue to be surprised that they think they lose less potential clients by oppressing open discussion on "issues", than they do by running the forum in such a controlling manner. They get more of a bad rap for their known anal fixation with any negative discussion, than they would if issues were allowed to be discussed.
My problem with this is more with Doxa than WUS. Perhaps the powers that be at WUS have tried talking with Doxa about a better approach and have been rebuffed. Perhaps. Regardless of how and why, it is what we all know it to be. A place where you are not to look at the man behind the curtain.
I'm glad that we don't have that problem here. We have too much respect for our members both old and new. Everyone here brings a fresh perspective to things and to not take advantage of that would be a shame.
Update: I shot Jason @ WUS a note asking if they have ever tried to counsel Doxa on a better approach. I'll let you know what i hear back and I also invited him to respond to this thread directly. My purpose hear is more to shine the light on Doxa, than give WUS a hard time. I don't know the arrangements and it really is not my business. But if I am going to comment on it, I want to invite anyone else to do so also. Doxa, WUS, my Mom, the White House, Pat, etc,.
** "Any complaints about this post will result in severe moderation!!".
I personally think this is pure 
Guys, have any of you ever had a simliar situation when dealing with Steve? 
with all he has done for DOXA. 
